Exclusive: Google leans on developers to use payment service

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,949
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
Android is open.
Yes, but not gaping.

I actually support this move. A consistent and safe format is needed across the board. It certainly seems heavy handed that it's the google system, but it's not different than apple with their system. Ultimately it's better for the users to have a known and trusted payment system.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,949
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
Yes, but not gaping.

I actually support this move. A consistent and safe format is needed across the board. It certainly seems heavy handed that it's the google system, but it's not different than apple with their system. Ultimately it's better for the users to have a known and trusted payment system.
It's interesting.

One of the most popular series of phones within the Android ecosystem - have no carrier branding, come only with the default OS with third party modifications, both hardware and software are controlled by one company. Hmmm, I could swear I know another company that releases its phones like this.

Also throw in the mandatory Holo requirements and this, sounds like Google is making small but very deliberate steps towards curation of their platform. Again, reminds me of another company, one of their competitors in fact.
 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,789
10
38

Google denies Android app payment crack-down

I guess you should always believe the first report you see ;)

seems Google's policy hasn't changed one bit

However, a Google spokesperson told both TechCrunch and The Verge that in fact its policies on in-app payments were unchanged from the original rules of March 2011. Those mandate that in-app purchasing be done through Google’s own system, with the spokesperson saying that it was likely just serendipitous timing that saw Papaya get a warning. “If [a developer] had been in breach of that, and we had only just noticed, that’s when we would send out a letter.”

If purchases within apps are for non-app-related goods or content – such as a hotel booking, or some sort of online shopping order – then developers are free to use their payment provider of choice, the spokesperson explained. However, if they are offering new app content, then they must use Play In-app Billing, complete with its 30-percent tithe to Google.
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
I really have no idea what you're talking about here.

Anyways, it appears it's false. That said, I still support google having a better market (or Play as they have now named it for some reason). The app store was one thing where the iphone was much better than android, although the improvements have been significant.

It's interesting.

One of the most popular series of phones within the Android ecosystem - have no carrier branding, come only with the default OS with third party modifications, both hardware and software are controlled by one company. Hmmm, I could swear I know another company that releases its phones like this.

Also throw in the mandatory Holo requirements and this, sounds like Google is making small but very deliberate steps towards curation of their platform. Again, reminds me of another company, one of their competitors in fact.
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
You don't see any similarities between the Galaxy Nexus and the iPhone?
Unless you're talking about from a functional stand point then not really. It's considered a developer phone. It's open to modification (encouraged in fact). I've already modified mine. A completely different experience from when I owned an iphone. The other non-nexus phones are modified by the telephone companies to suit their needs, but the end user can modify them too. With the iphone it's their way or not at all. Night and day.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,949
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
Unless you're talking about from a functional stand point then not really. It's considered a developer phone. It's open to modification (encouraged in fact). I've already modified mine. A completely different experience from when I owned an iphone. The other non-nexus phones are modified by the telephone companies to suit their needs, but the end user can modify them too.
I'm referring to how Google controls the hardware and OS completely. No crap loaded from the carriers. Longer cycle of support and updates from Google.

With the iphone it's their way or not at all.
Not really. Android has rooting and unlocking the bootloader. iPhone has jailbreaking. Both allows for the end user to customize the hell out of their mobile.
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
I'm referring to how Google controls the hardware and OS completely. No crap loaded from the carriers. Longer cycle of support and updates from Google.



Not really. Android has rooting and unlocking the bootloader. iPhone has jailbreaking. Both allows for the end user to customize the hell out of their mobile.
Google have their own developer phone, obviously they control the OS. That's the point. That's why me and other power users buy nexus phones. And I'd wager a significant number of them are running custom operating systems.

And rooting and jailbreaking are not the same thing. Rooting is OK with the hardware manufacturers. Some of them actively encourage it (HTC) and they don't make every effort they can to restrict it. Root based apps are available in the standard android market, no need for a third party stores like cydia. Apple does everything within their power to stop jailbreaking while android manufacturers don't concern themselves about it or even assist in it. That's what makes android open.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts