Citation needed. The Star is standing by their story and not apologizing for it because it was true. They went back and reconfirmed their sources and stood by it. Ford dropped his lawsuit alleging that it was false presumably because he could not win, because the story was true.
Having the right and invoking the right is two different things. There are so so many really important story that could be front page material. If you want to lead the Metro section or the Family Life section with it go for it. I don't really care about the Battling Bickersons (look it up), especially to start the day.
I see you have met him as well. Have you met his wife and mother in-law? They deserve eachother.
Bullshit!
and some of you hate the Star....the best daily newspaper in canada. Yes, they are openly a liberal newspaper. That means they are right in the middle between the far left and the far right. People on the far right are apparently enraged by that fact.
Actually no, not at all. Polls consistently show that people in Toronto prefer tax rises over service cuts. Ford campaigned on a platform that he would find inefficiencies and eliminate them, saving money. He made extensive use of the term "gravy" in connection with that. He specifically promised in his election campaign that he would not cut any services, and that's why he was elected.
I think they shifted to the left a while ago and now support the NDP not the Liberals.
HONESTLY I would not even wipe my ass with that paper and furthermore anyone who reads it is creepy eeck! Why do they feel it is there job to be king maker in Toronto using disgusting tactics and that they would be the first to cry foul if it was someone else. I can make decisions for myself not like those limp wrist-ed creeps that actually absorb that garbage as truth. Who in the hell in their right mind supports running a deficit raise taxes cut spending whatever folks do the math for fuck sakes!!
It's amazing how some react to certain things. I wonder what newspaper you read. A newspaper doesn't last as long as the Star, over 100 years, without some sense of balance or a least respect from a large group of people. Considering how many reporters and editors presently work for the Star and how many of the same over the years you're going to get some you disagree with, but to call it the equivalent of toilet paper is just nutts. If you tracked the same reporters and editors they, for all intents and purposes play musical chairs between the various papers, as it 's a very small club, and depending on the winds of the day, read owners.
