That's a long winded propaganda piece which bases almost its entire argument on the one mistranslated speech from 2005. There is no direct threats to Israel shown in any banners or images in that article. I can find more calls for attacking Iran in one issue of Haaretz or the Jerusalem post then you can find in that entire pamphlet.
The photos show two banners, neither of which directly threaten Israel.I posted the PDF so you could look at the photographs, Groggy. I don't expect that you can read. You asked for photographs, and there they are.
The first quote is not a direct threat."Israel should be wiped out of the face of the world"
"Death to Israel"
"this cancerous tumor of a state should be removed from the region"
If you don't see those as threats then you are a moron. Oh yeah... you are a moron. I bet you will say those are not threats!
The good news is that no leader in the first world agrees with you.Iran has not threatened Israel.
One of the interesting analysis offerd this past weekend by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita on GPS, was that while Ahmadenijhad and higher leavel theocrats bang heads about power in Iran, the head of the army/military General Jafari(?) will sneak up the middle and is more in favour of developing atomic research for industrial/medical reasons first and foremost, all the benefits of having the technology/threat and none of headaches of developing weapons out front. de Mesquita has a tremendous successful record of predicting events in the middle east, especially in recent years.The good news is that no leader in the first world agrees with you.
People in the military often understand the consequences of war and thus tend to be a little less hawkish. That would be a prudent course for Iran, it will be interesting to see if they follow it.One of the interesting analysis offerd this past weekend by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita on GPS, was that while Ahmadenijhad and higher leavel theocrats bang heads about power in Iran, the head of the army/military General Jafari(?) will sneak up the middle and is more in favour of developing atomic research for industrial/medical reasons first and foremost, all the benefits of having the technology/threat and none of headaches of developing weapons out front. de Mesquita has a tremendous successful record of predicting events in the middle east, especially in recent years.
Everybody but you sees it as a threat.The first quote is not a direct threat.
The fact that it was uttered by the Supreme Dictator of Iran in one of his official pronouncements should be enough to show that it is government policy.The second two, you will have to show evidence that its a government policy
You really are thick. Try just he latest attempt on the M/V Victoria earlier this year. look it up and learn something for a change. So now you're going to say Israel sells more so they're badder, meaner, more awfuller. You are giving the resident man-child a run for his money.Ok, so the threats don't exist we've now seen.
Next Fuji, why don't you show me evidence of all the weapons Iran has sent to Hamas and Hezbollah, and we'll see how that measures up to the amount of arms Israel sells and who they sell it to. That should be entertaining.
As does law. If you point a gun at someone and say that they are going to die, it is a direct threat. In this case Hezbollah and Hamas are the gun.Everybody but you sees it as a threat.
...
Look at these facts.You really are thick. Try just he latest attempt on the M/V Victoria earlier this year. look it up and learn something for a change. So now you're going to say Israel sells more so they're badder, meaner, more awfuller. You are giving the resident man-child a run for his money.
Right there you diverged from reality, and are now living on some weird planet with funny coloured air.Ok, so the threats don't exist we've now seen.
I'm still waiting for you to show me the threats.Right there you diverged from reality, and are now living on some weird planet with funny coloured air.
I agree it's arguable, the guy merely says that destroying Israel has been Iran's wish for quite a while. So why don't you respond to the rest of my post? It's a pretty decent explanation for why people are demonizing Iran? And I might ask - why are you defending Iran??? (not the country, it's leadership... seems like a fair question.)That's not a threat.
That's a declaration that if Israel attacks, they will respond.
Try again please.
Personally, I think the Iranian government should be turfed by the people, as they tried to do after the last elections.I agree it's arguable, the guy merely says that destroying Israel has been Iran's wish for quite a while. So why don't you respond to the rest of my post? It's a pretty decent explanation for why people are demonizing Iran? And I might ask - why are you defending Iran??? (not the country, it's leadership... seems like a fair question.)
You've been shown three of them. Quotes and photographs to boot. Official Iranian translations, published on official Iranian websites. Photos of the same quotes plastered on official Iranian government and military buildings.I'm still waiting for you to show me the threats.
And none of them were shown to be either threats or official government documents.You've been shown three of them. Quotes and photographs to boot. Official Iranian translations, published on official Iranian websites. Photos of the same quotes plastered on official Iranian government and military buildings.
The only problem here is between your keyboard and your chair.
Statements from official speeches delivered by the Iranian President and statements from official speeches given by the Supreme Dictator are indeed official government statements. And yes, they were threats.And none of them were shown to be either threats or official government documents.
