I'm a sex addict I admit. But from my experience, getting sex from gf's cost a lot of money and time. Is hobbying truly the cheapest way to get sex? And I mean sex from an attractive woman, of course.
Is hobbying the cheapest way to get sex?
- Thread starter prestokeys
- Start date
Quicker, too, but probably would not repeat.there are way cheaper less legal ways.
Depends on what your time and effort are worth, and what your standards are.I'm a sex addict I admit. But from my experience, getting sex from gf's cost a lot of money and time. Is hobbying truly the cheapest way to get sex?
If you drop those standards into the basement, a whole new world of possibilities awaits you...
Yes good point. Let's raise the bar:Depends on what your time and effort are worth, and what your standards are.
If you drop those standards into the basement, a whole new world of possibilities awaits you...
Is hobbying the cheapest way to get sex from an attractive woman?
Certainly, especially if you're into variety, hobbying is likely more cost effective than dating.
Definitely, you get exactly what you want with a smile, you never have to hear "you want me to do what??" I agree sex with a GF is expensive and you're never sure what or if you're going to get at the end of a date. GF 's expect wining and dining and taken out. When I'm with an SP I always get great a GF experience which satifies my romantic needs and a great time between the sheets.
What about that typical rich guy who acquired an amazingly hot gf through much expenditures, and she gives him amazing sex on a regular basis? If you take the total amount of money he has spent on her and divide by the number of times she's given her sex, will it be more or less than a typical SP's fee?
I don't think having sex with a girl will average out to $250 per hour. One night stands are typically bar pickups and shouldn't set you back $250 in out of pocket costs. More typically, 3 dates might cost you more than $250, but hopefully, you'll be able to bang her a few times. In the end, it's more effort, but should be cheaper with a civvie.
Keep in mind that (especially if we limit the scope to attractive women) you may not get lucky each time you hit the scene to try to land a sex partner. You may spend hundreds of dollars before you score a suitable partner and when you're tired of her, you have to start the whole process again.I don't think having sex with a girl will average out to $250 per hour. One night stands are typically bar pickups and shouldn't set you back $250 in out of pocket costs. More typically, 3 dates might cost you more than $250, but hopefully, you'll be able to bang her a few times. In the end, it's more effort, but should be cheaper with a civvie.
Of course, there are benefits and advantages to real-life relationships. However, if the question is strictly the amount spent per hour of sex, I still think dating is more costly if the goal is to have variety and not a serious long-tern relationship.
I think that it is probably the most economical. By that, I mean more than simple cash outlay. Going purely by the dollar amount per sexual encounter numbers, I think that a hot sex crazed girlfriend is cheaper in the long run. There is an initial investment in the relationship, which can be expensive - dinners, drinks, perhaps gifts, etc. There is also the time you spend with them, and the competition you face from other possibly better candidates vying for her time and sweet charms. However, once you have her, assuming all you want is sex, then the cost per screw will eventually drop until you just climb on her and pump one out after watching Survivor.
However, as the 'spheroid alludes to, if you want variety and multiple partners in a short amount of time, then it's likely that the hobby will serve you better. Unless you're the kind of man who can roll through a nightclub and effortlessly pick up hot ladies with questionable decision-making skills on demand, then the hobby provides you two main advantages. Frost, you can seek out exactly the kind of girl you'd like to see that day and read her reviews, and you can engage her services directly. The drawback is that the cost per session will generally remain the same, notwithstanding the possiblity of earning a 'regulars' discount. YoU can meet lots of new women quickly without incurring those upfront costs associated with getting a non-professional's skirt up over her head.
The actual cost/benefits will depend on your time, your tastes, your experience and skill at convincing good girls to do nasty things with strangers on the one hand versus a simple x dollars per hour formula.
However, as the 'spheroid alludes to, if you want variety and multiple partners in a short amount of time, then it's likely that the hobby will serve you better. Unless you're the kind of man who can roll through a nightclub and effortlessly pick up hot ladies with questionable decision-making skills on demand, then the hobby provides you two main advantages. Frost, you can seek out exactly the kind of girl you'd like to see that day and read her reviews, and you can engage her services directly. The drawback is that the cost per session will generally remain the same, notwithstanding the possiblity of earning a 'regulars' discount. YoU can meet lots of new women quickly without incurring those upfront costs associated with getting a non-professional's skirt up over her head.
The actual cost/benefits will depend on your time, your tastes, your experience and skill at convincing good girls to do nasty things with strangers on the one hand versus a simple x dollars per hour formula.
That's true. But say you wanted to have sex 100 times a year. That's anywhere from $15k to $25k, depending on who you see, how long you go for, etc.Keep in mind that (especially if we limit the scope to attractive women) you may not get lucky each time you hit the scene to try to land a sex partner. You may spend hundreds of dollars before you score a suitable partner and when you're tired of her, you have to start the whole process again.
Of course, there are benefits and advantages to real-life relationships. However, if the question is strictly the amount spent per hour of sex, I still think dating is more costly if the goal is to have variety and not a serious long-tern relationship.
I still think you would spend less than that pursuing women for the year, but by spending more, you're guaranteed 100 different sex partners if that was what you wanted. Unlikely you could accomplish this by going after civvies.
That's the crux of it. A fixed, known rate per sexual encounter in the hobby versus an unknown variable subject to factors beyond your control in the wild.That's true. But say you wanted to have sex 100 times a year. That's anywhere from $15k to $25k, depending on who you see, how long you go for, etc.
I still think you would spend less than that pursuing women for the year, but by spending more, you're guaranteed 100 different sex partners if that was what you wanted. Unlikely you could accomplish this by going after civvies.
Ok, let's do the math. Sex everyday with an SP equals abouts $55K. Are guys who get laid everyday by their hot gf's spending more or less than 55K per year, including the intial costs of courting her before getting her to become a regular sex partner?
Yes yes, we've heard that one. Very clever.If it flys, floats or FUCKS. RENT IT!!
I think the OP was looking for some slightly more insightful analysis. I know I was...
I think that time spent on a girl in expectation of sex is work and should be counted as billable time. I know I take it into equation and after that it makes no sense whatsoever to go n dates. I still do that but it's mostly a waste of time and I recognize it as such.
