Drunk Mountie lost BlackBerry, wallet, during sex with prostitute

[Babypowder]

In late 2009, senior RCMP officers launched an investigation to recover a constable's identification card and force-issued BlackBerry that had been stolen by a prostitute while she performed oral sex on the officer in his car.

According to RCMP files obtained by the Citizen, Const. Shyamal Ramlu, who works in Langley, B.C., left a colleague's retirement party at 11: 08 p.m. on Dec. 12, 2009 after calling Operation Red Nose because he was too drunk to drive.

But once home, Ramlu did not stay long. He got in his car and started driving around the streets of Surrey, looking for a prostitute. On the other side of midnight, he found one. She was waving at him, according to Ramlu's account, so he pulled over, and after a brief chat, she climbed in the passenger's side and performed oral sex.

It was during the act that the prostitute noticed Ramlu's BlackBerry and wallet on the console between the front seats. The street prostitute regularly stole wallets from her johns and this time was no different, she later told investigators, according to RCMP files.

Ramlu, who did not return a message for comment, let the prostitute out of the vehicle and returned home. When he realized his wallet and BlackBerry were missing, he called the Mounties to report them stolen. He said he suspected the prostitute.

His own report prompted senior Mounties to launch an investigation, during which they found his wallet and RCMP identification card in a drug house on Jan. 28, 2010. The RCMP BlackBerry was never recovered.

The constable's personal credit cards had also been fraudulently used between Dec. 13, 2009 and Jan. 28, 2010.

After Ramlu reported the theft to his fellow RCMP officers, he told his wife what had happened and she stood by his side.

Ramlu was never charged with communicating for the purpose of prostitution. or with drunk driving.

Senior Mounties acknowledged he immediately, at his own behest, gave a full account of what happened and admitted everything.

Ramlu also co-operated with the ensuing investigation, which led to the identification and arrest of the prostitute, as well as the execution of a search warrant at the drug house.

In late March 2011, the RCMP held a disciplinary hearing in Ottawa to decide Ramlu's fate.

The RCMP penalized the officer by docking him five days pay



http://www.ottawacitizen.com/

 

[blackrock13]

So they are like most of us here on TERB.

 

[Hangman]

The RCMP penalized the officer by docking him five days pay

Plus, all his buddies will never ever let him forget it. Every time he goes to a new post, they'll know his story and be laughing their heads off.

 

[CapitalGuy]

Needs to work vice for a while so he learns to prozzy-proof his car. What a 'tard, leaving his goodies out in the open.

 

[Aardvark154]

So they are like most of us here on TERB.

The point of the op posting this was what. a) RCMP Constables are much like the rest of us. b) he should have gotten a room and gone for outcall c) he did the right thing and was honest with his suppervisors and wife d) all of the above.

 

[The Fruity Hare]

The point of the op posting this was what. a) RCMP Constables are much like the rest of us. b) he should have gotten a room and gone for outcall c) he did the right thing and was honest with his suppervisors and wife d) all of the above.

or

d) Ramlu was never charged with communicating for the purpose of prostitution. Or with drunk driving.

Maybe next time the RCMP stop someone who is drunk driving, they can confess before the breathalizer is given, and they will also not be charged?

 

[middleweight]

Now we're just waiting for Toronto's favourite Officer Bubbles to slip up!

Many SP's have told me they service cops.

 

[LancsLad]

He gets to play the affirmative action race card and avoid any serious consequences.

I blame peter trewdough. Thanks alot fuktard.

.


.

 

[Aardvark154]

Ramlu was never charged with communicating for the purpose of prostitution. Or with drunk driving.

The first was covered by "c". As for the second, I know that here on TERB we are all clairvoyant, but quite how do you propose to obtain a conviction absent testimony by a Constable that "R" was in the driver’s seat, that there was probable cause, that his BAC was tested and was above the limit? I suppose there may be an OUI/DUI/OWI conviction somewhere based upon a confession alone, but if there is I've never heard of it.

 

[Aardvark154]

Many SP's have told me they service cops.

If you are speaking of soliciting Streetwakers that is one thing. But if you are speaking of Escort SPs it isn't illegal what's your problem with it?

 

[The Fruity Hare]

The first was covered by "c". As for the second, I know that here on TERB we are all clairvoyant, but quite how do you propose to obtain a conviction absent testimony by a Constable that "R" was in the driver’s seat, that there was probable cause, that his BAC was tested and was above the limit? I suppose there may be an OUI/DUI/OWI conviction somewhere based upon a confession alone, but if there is I've never heard of it.

How exactly is that covered by "c"? By being honest he doesn't get charged, whereas anyone else would? As for the second part, does his own personal ability to recognize drunkeness as part of his job not come into play? His decision:

According to RCMP files obtained by the Citizen, Const. Shyamal Ramlu, who works in Langley, B.C., left a colleague's retirement party at 11: 08 p.m. on Dec. 12, 2009 after calling Operation Red Nose because he was too drunk to drive.

so if he knew he was too drunk to drive, then he was too drunk to drive!

 

[The Fruity Hare]

If you are speaking of soliciting Streetwakers that is one thing. But if you are speaking of Escort SPs it isn't illegal what's your problem with it?

What would happen if a police officer was a found in during a raid on a bawdy house? They are not legal.

 

[Aardvark154]

According to RCMP files obtained by the Citizen, Const. Shyamal Ramlu, who works in Langley, B.C., left a colleague's retirement party at 11: 08 p.m. on Dec. 12, 2009 after calling Operation Red Nose because he was too drunk to drive.

so if he knew he was too drunk to drive, then he was too drunk to drive!

One point is additional time had elapsed, second he felt he was too intoxicated to drive - no one did a BAC, third as before mentioned good luck obtaining a conviction and that would apply to any of us as well.

As to the first are you suggesting that the appropriate way to address admitting to stupidity is to lay criminal charges?

 

[Aardvark154]

What would happen if a police officer was a found in during a raid on a bawdy house? They are not legal.

True, but I assumed that our fellow TERBite was not violating the law himself.

 

[T.O.tourist]

According to RCMP files obtained by the Citizen, Const. Shyamal Ramlu, who works in Langley, B.C., left a colleague's retirement party at 11: 08 p.m. on Dec. 12, 2009 after calling Operation Red Nose because he was too drunk to drive.

so if he knew he was too drunk to drive, then he was too drunk to drive!

Was he too drunk to drive or was he being overly cautious calling Operation Red Nose?
Without a BAC or blood test we will never know.
*edit* sorry covered in above posts

What I was wondering is; Whether or not, one of us -harmless civilians- would be charged after admitting to the police that we picked up a SW and exchanged money for sex?

 

[Aardvark154]

What I was wondering is; Whether or not, one of us -harmless civilians- would be charged after admitting to the police that we picked up a SW and exchanged money for sex?

One would hope not, when the reason it was brought to light was reporting a theft.

 

[WoodPeckr]

If you are speaking of soliciting Streetwakers that is one thing. But if you are speaking of Escort SPs it isn't illegal what's your problem with it?

It's fascinating to watch you take such a Liberal position here Counsel....:eyebrows:

 

[MrMessi]

It just tells you something, don't fuck with the law.

 

[The Fruity Hare]

One point is additional time had elapsed, second he felt he was too intoxicated to drive - no one did a BAC, third as before mentioned good luck obtaining a conviction and that would apply to any of us as well.

As to the first are you suggesting that the appropriate way to address admitting to stupidity is to lay criminal charges?

Admitting to stupidity, and admitting to breaking the law are two different things.

 

[wet_suit_one]

Was he too drunk to drive or was he being overly cautious calling Operation Red Nose?
Without a BAC or blood test we will never know.
*edit* sorry covered in above posts

What I was wondering is; Whether or not, one of us -harmless civilians- would be charged after admitting to the police that we picked up a SW and exchanged money for sex?

Not without providing proof that you communicated in a public place. If it wasn't a public place (e.g. a Timmy Ho's bathroom, bad e.g. but it squelches the charge), no conviction can ensue as one of the components of the charge has not been made out.