Ontario bodychecking ban a hit with experts

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,795
2,806
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
TORONTO — The Ontario Hockey Federation's decision to ban bodychecking will likely draw more players to the game and keep others from dropping out, experts say.

The federation is making the change -- which affects players between the ages of six and 21 -- in an effort to create a safer environment for new players to develop skills.

"Probably the hottest topic over the course of the winter was concussions and some of the injuries that were occurring in the game," said Tony Martindale, executive director of the Minor Hockey Alliance of Ontario. "I think the biggest concern is we all have to look at ways of keeping kids in the game longer."

The rule change, which was announced Wednesday, affects house league and select players in most of the province, though Ottawa and Thunder Bay aren't governed by the OHF. House league includes players of all skill levels while select teams are made up of the top house league players.

York University health professor Alison Macpherson, who was among the first researchers to call for bodychecking to be disallowed in recreational hockey, calls it a great first step.

"I know some parents keep their kids out of hockey, especially out of competitive hockey, because they worry about the injuries that might ensue when kids are allowed to bodycheck," she said Thursday.

OHF spokesman Phil McKee says parents have been calling on officials to ban bodychecking for years.

"Bodychecking's been a debate at every level for the past 30 years," he said. "It's been discussed since 1981."

Until now parents who wanted their child to play non-contact hockey didn't have many options, said Macpherson.

"There is pretty good scientific evidence that bodychecking, especially under the bantam level (age 13-14), leads to injury in youth ice hockey," she said.

A study published last year found kids who were bodychecked were about 2.45 times more likely to suffer an injury than kids who didn't play with body contact and 1.7 times more likely to suffer a concussion, she said.

"Kids are more likely to play if they think they're not going to get hurt," said Macpherson. "Which is great because we have an obesity epidemic."

http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110505/110505_bodychecking/20110505/?hub=CP24Home
 

C Dick

Banned
Feb 2, 2002
4,223
2
0
Ontario
This is such crap. Yes, checking causes injuries. But non-contact hockey causes more injuries than playing Xbox, why don't they ban hockey entirely? The answer is because hockey is fun, and the fun makes the risk of injury worthwhile. The same is true of checking, it causes injury, but the fun justifies it for many players. There should be leagues with both, and the players and parents can decide for themselves. Now the only way to get checking is to play rep, and not everyone has the talent, or commitment, to play rep. Taking away choice and freedom is not good.
 

doggee_01

Active member
Jul 11, 2003
8,350
1
36
god help any of the kids that want to move up from select to A AA AAA hockey they will have no idea - hockey is a contact sport this is a bunch of crap!!!
 

Mervyn

New member
Dec 23, 2005
3,549
0
0
"Kids are more likely to play if they think they're not going to get hurt," said Macpherson. "Which is great because we have an obesity epidemic."

http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110505/110505_bodychecking/20110505/?hub=CP24Home
I don't disagree with the removal of body checking for the younger kids, say under 13 , that's fine. But I find this justification ludicrous , I'm better they never spoke to kids about this and what their feelings on it are, which is contact is darn fun.
 

k57

Member
Aug 19, 2001
605
1
18
In a living hell
Actually the majority of house leagues haven't allowed body checking for some time, anyway. I'm not sure this applies to all of Ontario: gets confusing with different governing bodies: OHF, OMHA, GTHL etc. Most the likely the biggest affect will be on Select Hockey governed by the OHF.

I have one son who went back to house league after having playing rep hockey; his thirst for competitive hockey was satisfied playing select in the loop run by the NYHL which runs a good 3 Tier Select Loop with players definitely of A, in some cases AA, calibre skills. Bodychecking was allowed in the select; not in the house league. Making the adjustment to non contact in house league games wasn't a big deal for him, but the constant hooking became a constant source of frustration for him. He's a pretty slick puck handler and I would just shake my head most games, he could pick up the puck in his end and be hooked at least 3 times going down the ice with the ref just looking the other way. Most of these were unintentional hooks by less skilled players with weak skating skills who would just wave their stick at him, most kids don't know how to stick check properly either. But a friend of mine made a good observation about not allowing body checking in house league. Weaker skating kids are easily knocked down all the time, even when they're just bumped, and may become so discouraged they end up quitting the game.

Most injuries resulting from body checking are because kids don't know how to body check. It's a hockey skill that needs to taught the same as skating, shooting and passing. Kids need to learn how to check and HOW TO TAKE A CHECK.

I wasn't a big kid, but loved body checking when I played. If a guy twice my size knocked me on my ass; I'd look for the first opportunity to hit him back. It didn't matter to me if I just bounced off him, I just wanted to show him he couldn't intimidate me.

One last point: 3 kids in the no body checking house league my son played in this season had season-ending injuries, 2 broken arms, one broken ankle. Not due to dirty play, but accidents happen.
 

Wizard Merlin

Well-known member
Apr 6, 2009
1,688
142
63
Toronto
I agree with the new ban on checking. It's really not necessary to have body checking to enjoy this sport. My beer league hockey is intense enough without the body checking.

Luckily for my son, he's moving up to A hockey next year. He would have flipped had he remained in Select. He's a big kid that loves to hit.

I don't necessarily love his style of play, but as long as it's legal there's nothing I can do.

He also played Football for a couple of seasons and now plays Lacrosse for the first time. He just loves the physical aspect of sports.
 

givemebrain

New member
Sep 14, 2007
787
0
0
between a rock and a hard place
So how are 'late bloomer' type kids supposed to move up from house-league (no hitting) to rep (hitting) now? Now they'll have to adapt not only to the increased skill and speed of the competition, they'll have to learn how to hit/be hit at the same time? That will become very difficult and result in a lot of players who should be graduating to rep hockey staying stuck in house league.
 

k57

Member
Aug 19, 2001
605
1
18
In a living hell
So how are 'late bloomer' type kids supposed to move up from house-league (no hitting) to rep (hitting) now? Now they'll have to adapt not only to the increased skill and speed of the competition, they'll have to learn how to hit/be hit at the same time? That will become very difficult and result in a lot of players who should be graduating to rep hockey staying stuck in house league.
There are hockey instructors out there who schedule hitting clinics for that very reason. The rep club my son used to be with, always hired a hockey instructor who would run a one-hour hitting clinic for each of its teams just prior to the season, teaching the kids all the dos and don'ts of hitting, and how to take a hit.

I see your point, but like I said most house leagues already are non-contact, yet kids still graduate from those ranks to rep.
 
Toronto Escorts