SP’s who get preg from clients
- Thread starter kono
- Start date
@CapitalGuy, that was a longass diatribe for someone who tells others to not take things seriously,no?...At the end of the day, you did make a dumbass comment about hiding from responsibility of raising a child,nothing funny about that even if it was said in jest. (in which case you have a crappy sense of humour)
so @Fuji, you win....by the tiniest fraction of whatever(I'm not good at the maths)..you sound like no Prince Charming but at least you'd do the right thing in this case.
so @Fuji, you win....by the tiniest fraction of whatever(I'm not good at the maths)..you sound like no Prince Charming but at least you'd do the right thing in this case.
Didn't you see where I said I'm smiling??
You don't seem to be smiling. Relax.fuji would also torture people and gun down innocent protesters, he has a history here. And not a proud one. Happy Easter Peggy.
The citation states that in 'certain families, the level of education can be a cause for the child not to be independent', so does that mean that if you don't have higher education yourself, that it's not expected of a parent to support their child who may want to go onto say, medical school? If the kid is capable, I would imagine that if the parent or parents can afford to foot the bill, then the courts will order it.
In a world with modern birth control methods, many good families desperate for a healthy baby to adopt and safe abortion procedures, there is absolutely no reason for anyone to be stuck with a kid they didn't want.
It is a woman's choice, [as it should be] but with rights come responsibilities. Just one more example where women want the advantages but none of the disadvantages.
If I have no say in the matter, I should not have any financial liability in the matter either.
It is a woman's choice, [as it should be] but with rights come responsibilities. Just one more example where women want the advantages but none of the disadvantages.
If I have no say in the matter, I should not have any financial liability in the matter either.
Anyways now that I got that sarcasm out of my system I found out the answer to the earlier question about how long one generally has to support a child. It seems the Family Law Act in Ontario pretty much spells it out:
(I left in the thing about parents because I didn't know that and thought it was cool.)
Anyways my associate tells me that the courts will award support through an undergrad/college program these days without batting an eye but look long and hard at support after that. Each case is treated differently so you have to be careful.
Now, if you are about to ask me if the child is married and still in school do they get support, I would again say, I don't know and probably don't have time to track down the answer today.
And for those who want to know how much, I would refer you to the Ontario Child Support Guidelines.
(I left in the thing about parents because I didn't know that and thought it was cool.)
Anyways my associate tells me that the courts will award support through an undergrad/college program these days without batting an eye but look long and hard at support after that. Each case is treated differently so you have to be careful.
Now, if you are about to ask me if the child is married and still in school do they get support, I would again say, I don't know and probably don't have time to track down the answer today.
And for those who want to know how much, I would refer you to the Ontario Child Support Guidelines.
Good points in this thread Ladyraven. However, in the real world I certainly would presume that almost all if not all SPs are on "the Pill" or IUDs etc. . . and further if they knew there was an acident would take the "morning after pill."
@Fat One, you're a dolt....just because biology made it so that the woman carries the child and has the ultimate say in whether she carries it or not, you think that gives you(the one who knocked her up) a free pass on whether or you WANT to take of the child??
"Derrr, Well she wants to have it so I guess that's just her responsibility, cause it's the woman's job to take care of our child, derrr excuse me while I go to the bar" Ha, what a silly man you are. Guess what, you helped make a child w someone, you're BOTH responsable for it, end of story. Now go back to your cave.
"Derrr, Well she wants to have it so I guess that's just her responsibility, cause it's the woman's job to take care of our child, derrr excuse me while I go to the bar" Ha, what a silly man you are. Guess what, you helped make a child w someone, you're BOTH responsable for it, end of story. Now go back to your cave.
In this day and age, the woman has total control on if they want to have a child. Get with the times. As a male I have pretty nothing to do with the decision.
If a girl makes the choice to lie about or "forget" to use a decent birth control method like the pill or other more reliable methods, makes a further choice not to take a day after pill, and not get an abortion or an adoption, that kid is her responsibility. There is a whole chain of decisions that could stop the situation, which the male has no say on.
If you want to hold the man equally responsible then he should also have as much say in the adoption/abortion decision.
Typical white knight and feminist bullshit, they want it both ways. They want all the power but not the responsibility.
But yeah I am a brontosaurs, I think people should be responsible for the decisions they make. But lets us not hold women up to that standard, their little brains could never handle it. Hell next thing you know they might want the vote, be able to hold property and enter contracts. Silly me I thought holding women to adult standards made me a modern guy.
You're lying. This is killing you. Its making me laugh!!
And, you're equally if not much more morally bankrupt (adultery, torture, murder, ya - you're a real jewel!!!)
FatOne, the laws/courts strive to ensure that our modern society is a just one. This means to acknowledge the rights of a woman over her own body and the best interests of a born child. Therefore, if a woman chooses not to abort, then the burden of rearing the child must be shared between the parents. Otherwise, it's unfair for a woman to shoulder the responsibility alone.
Dolly and I were just saying that!!!! but holy crap.. most the men here are putting it all on the SP and then not wanting anything to do with the child..
You choose to see a SP. and then continue if the rubber breaks or worse have bbfs.. IT TAKES 2!!!!!
you do not want a baby and she dont believe in abortion cuz of both of yours stupidy there is adoption... give the baby up to someone who actually wants a child..
You need to slow down on the drinking. And the lying. You`ve outed yourself and you won`t be able to get away from it.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?333006-NATO-to-send-troops-into-Libya
Nowhere on that thread did I advocate torture or murder. In fact, most of my posts on that thread are about condemning the Canadian Forces for engaging in a regime of torture in Afghanistan.
Again, you`re lying. Not surprising, coming from a deadbeat, though...
Keep saying it over and over, but it still won't be true. The rest of us can read.
Happy Easter.
