Actually, now he has plead the case his case, and damages if any, have crystalized. We know the alleged violation and the alleged outcome. Repatriation is neither here nor there now that there is a finding and a sentence.Nothing, really, will happen until Khadr is repatriated, I think. Up until that point the govt. could argue that the SCC ruling leaves it to the govt. to decide on a remedy as it's a foreign affairs matter. Once he's repatriated and that objection is vapour I think you will see Khadr suing for millions, with a strong chance that he'll win.
Unless the US renegs on the sentence and/or pulls some more bullshit and/or their SC overturns the farce. Given that they are making up the rules as they go in his case I wouldn't trust anythign they do or say until he's back on Canadian soil and out of their tyrannical power.Actually, now he has plead the case his case, and damages if any, have crystalized. We know the alleged violation and the alleged outcome. Repatriation is neither here nor there now that there is a finding and a sentence.
I do hope Fuji that you make it a point never to visit either on pleasure or business the obvious epitome of evil in the world "Unless the US . . . .out of their tyrannical power.
The system at Gitmo is patently tyrannical, unlike the system in the US proper.I do hope Fuji that you make it a point never to visit either on pleasure or business the obvious epitome of evil in the world "![]()
All excuses not to move the case forward. With the plea, it has no legs. But time will tell. Personally I have no interest in paying to incarcerate their prisoners.Unless the US renegs on the sentence and/or pulls some more bullshit and/or their SC overturns the farce. Given that they are making up the rules as they go in his case I wouldn't trust anythign they do or say until he's back on Canadian soil and out of their tyrannical power.
Let's see what happens once he's repatriated. You will be wrong.All excuses not to move the case forward. With the plea, it has no legs. But time will tell. Personally I have no interest in paying to incarcerate their prisoners.
Keep digging the hole, when the govt. settles with Khadr it's going to be delicious bringing these quotes back up.Yes your vast years of litigation experience allow you to pontificate with such certainty.
I heard they were going to make you dean of the Lakehead Law School.
Knowing your m.o., even if the case is dismissed you will keep up the same banter. Your fanatical worldview cannot accept reality impinging.Keep digging the hole, when the govt. settles with Khadr it's going to be delicious bringing these quotes back up.
Once free, he will leave Canada, with very good reason. Would luv to see the little fucker strolling through my town.Nothing, really, will happen until Khadr is repatriated, I think. Up until that point the govt. could argue that the SCC ruling leaves it to the govt. to decide on a remedy as it's a foreign affairs matter. Once he's repatriated and that objection is vapour I think you will see Khadr suing for millions, with a strong chance that he'll win.
Then the courts will do it, and it'll be even more expensive for the taxpayer.The government can not afford to settle with him, politically it would be a death knell for either of the major parties.
If the government tries to block his repatriation on that grounds he'll sue for that too, a court will order him repatriated, and the monetary award will only go up. I don't see that happening--Harper is trying to avoid the issue, not make it worse.One other thing, do you actually think the repatriation deal would have been signed with a a waiver of some kind saying no lawsuit?
I see you don't much believe in the rule of law.Once free, he will leave Canada, with very good reason. Would luv to see the little fucker strolling through my town.
Sometimes the law is an ass. He doesn't deserve to live here and I don't believe Canadians want him to. Much like what happens to pedophiles put in with the general population of a prison. Don't think many people care when someone takes care of them either.I see you don't much believe in the rule of law.
If he signed off on his plea deal and a condition of that plea was no civil liability he does not have a leg to stand on.If the government tries to block his repatriation on that grounds he'll sue for that too, a court will order him repatriated, and the monetary award will only go up. I don't see that happening--Harper is trying to avoid the issue, not make it worse.