Oh, now you are suggesting that the IDF is only there to make Hamas comply with the Geneva Conventions. Too bad they were helping enforcing what the ICRC (your favourite source) called a war crime in the blockade policy. Which puts it morally about as equivalent to the US attempting to control terrorism through the torturing of Khadr.I don't see any use for the ICC here. Hamas isn't going to submit to it to begin with, you'd have to send in an army to make them comply--IDF is already doing that.
No, that's a war crime you're suggesting.If you have reasonable grounds to think your target is the enemy the rules of war allow you to kill at will.
No, just that Hamas isn't going to suddenly stop its war crimes just because ICC or ICRC or UNSC or anybody else tells them to. It's already well established that Hamas commit war crimes, and the only military that is doing anything about it, that will ever do anything about it, is IDF.Oh, now you are suggesting that the IDF is only there to make Hamas comply with the Geneva Conventions.
I realize you are mentally challenged, and can't remember something for 5 minutes, but, once again, for about the millionth time, ICRC was explicit that it was the border closure that it was concerned about--a closure which was lifted pretty much immediately after ICRC raised its concern.Too bad they were helping enforcing what the ICRC (your favourite source) called a war crime in the blockade policy.
Nope. And at this point I'm just going to say you're too stupid for this debate to continue: In a war you can shoot the enemy. Duh. Can't believe you are arguing with that--what a moron.No, that's a war crime you're suggesting.
That's true. Armed militants sitting in a police station, however, is something completely different.Police sitting in stations on the first day of hostilities do not fit that description
More unsubstantiated propaganda from you. Pretty much all humanitarian organizations recognize that Israel has strong, free, democratic, and vibrant courts. I've previously quoted you the founder of HRW on this topic, I can quote him again if you like.able to put on its own show trials all by itself
You suggest that Israel, who is apparently just as guilty in war crimes as Hamas, should police Gaza?No, just that Hamas isn't going to suddenly stop its war crimes just because ICC or ICRC or UNSC or anybody else tells them to. It's already well established that Hamas commit war crimes, and the only military that is doing anything about it, that will ever do anything about it, is IDF.
Oh this is boring.ICRC was explicit that it was the border closure that it was concerned about--a closure which was lifted pretty much immediately after ICRC raised its concern.ICRC has never raised any concern with the naval blockade.
Sigh, I expect an apology from you for this one, though I know you are too much a propagandist to ever admit error.More unsubstantiated propaganda from you. Pretty much all humanitarian organizations recognize that Israel has strong, free, democratic, and vibrant courts. I've previously quoted you the founder of HRW on this topic, I can quote him again if you like.
First thing in your entire posting history you've gotten correct....
Oh this is boring....
I don't know why I feel compelled to argue with Fuji, he just lies, repeats his lies even after being caught out on them and ignores anything that doesn't fit his twisted view.First thing in your entire posting history you've gotten correct.
Wow. Must of us would substitute your name for his before agreeing with this staement.I don't know why I feel compelled to argue with Fuji, he just lies, repeats his lies even after being caught out on them and ignores anything that doesn't fit his twisted view.
I need a new hobby, wait, before I wasted too much free time arguing with an ass I used to hobby.....
Huh? The things Israel's accused of are trivial and minor compared to the crimes Hamas brags about committing. Moving population into an occupied area is illegal, but as far as war crimes go, a fairly minor thing. The terrorist attacks on civilians that Hamas carry out are the gravest war crimes on the books.You suggest that Israel, who is apparently just as guilty in war crimes as Hamas, should police Gaza?
You, sir, are once again proving yourself a propaganda parrot.
Please quote anything anywhere in either Goldstone or in any ICRC statement that even mentions the naval aspects of the blockade, or anything anywhere that asserts that Israel does not have a right to inspect cargo into Gaza.And once again, it is only you who argues that they are separate.
Looks like a good example of the Israeli courts working to me.Sigh, I expect an apology from you for this one, though I know you are too much a propagandist to ever admit error.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20101121/wl_mideast_afp/israelpalestiniansconflictgazamilitarytrial
Once again showing your lack of morals.Looks like a good example of the Israeli courts working to me.
You know, Blackrock, maybe you're right.Around and around and around and around! Boring!
And us also just go with the foxes' ruling that weasels have a right to eat chickens.You know, Blackrock, maybe you're right.
Lets just go with Eric Blair's ruling and call the argument over and me the clear winner.
Done.
Looks like the courts investigated it, put a stop to it, and registered a conviction. Fortunately no-one was hurt, which would explain the suspended sentence.Once again showing your lack of morals.
You really think that using a 9 year old as a human shield in battle should result in no punishment?
Spoken like a true propaganda clown. You appear to be neither smart enough, nor honest enough, to admit when you've lost a point.You know, Blackrock, maybe you're right.
Lets just go with Eric Blair's ruling and call the argument over and me the clear winner.
Done.
