The Nala photos are horribly lit and cropped - I'm not even a photographer and I can tell that. Meanwhile, the Arizona pictures look like they could have been pulled from an ad, calendar, poster, whatever. Seriously, you can't tell the difference?For us technically challenged people why don't you say something productive and tell us how it is so easy to determine if the photo is fake. They are all cropped and sort of look the same. I thought the one of Nala was fake but turns out it is real.
Thanks for bursting my bubble! Thought they were real for sure (lol)Are people really this inept at spotting obvious fake photos?
The Arizona pictures are equally poor , in my opinion. They certainly are not stolen off of any ads, or posters, they have the same quality of an amateur photo flat up against a wall, cheap poses poor framing, no depth of field and shadowy etc. Nala's photos are likely taken with a cell phone camera with no flash, where as Arizona's photos appear to have a flash or taken with sufficient light from a window. Curiously Arizona has been around for a while an no reviews ?The Nala photos are horribly lit and cropped - I'm not even a photographer and I can tell that. Meanwhile, the Arizona pictures look like they could have been pulled from an ad, calendar, poster, whatever. Seriously, you can't tell the difference?
Tuscon or Tulsa? If she's Tulsa's mom, we can ask DJ Frost about her. He's quite close with the family. They even share a computer.Can't believe no one has asked if Arizona is Tuscon's mom?????
FYI, there's been someone running ads as Tuscon ..........
Just to add my 2 cents on spotting obvious fakes, this picture doesn't look obviously fake to me. People have mentioned lighting or cropping being give aways, but I'd say the contents of a photo are also give aways. You'll notice in this picture, that it's taken on a plain unmade bed, not on a tightly made hotel-style bed. That would indicate it's not necessarily professionally photographed. Also looking at the subject of the photo, there's some quite obvious signs of wrinkling on the legs and stomach. Professional photogs would never let their models pose like that, so unflatteringly. Or if they did let them pose like that, it would mean that those models could pull off that pose without looking wrinkly. Plus, there would be some generous amounts of touch-ups, airbrushing, etc. There's some age spots in various places, which makes me think that she is in her 40's or 50's, but relatively fit still.Are people really this inept at spotting obvious fake photos?