Is there something in the air?And another one bites the dust !!
Who's next ?
backwoods formally known as badgarage maybeAnd another one bites the dust !!
Who's next ?
When you said "backwoods" I thought you were referring to tboy's new neighbourhood.backwoods
lmfaoWhen you said "backwoods" I thought you were referring to tboy's new neighbourhood.
I thought it was rather severe to ban tboy's entire new neighbourhood. When you said "badgarage", I thought you were referring to tboy's old neighbourhood. I think tboy said he lived out of a garage for a spell.lmfao
Yes, but those guys banned our sweet little Kareena and made her sad.He's joined the nicer board as well as all the other popular guys lately. It really is, the place to be!
Troll...One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevance to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.I have nothing against him either because he's definitely an earnest person.
However, he really sticks to his opinions and facts - which are more often than not false, based on faulty logic or easily disproven - and that's when he gets himself into hot water.
I'd like to see him back someday - when he's not arguing, he adds a good deal to the board.
The issue there is with 'purposeful and deliberate'-- He usually strikes me as honestly coming by his wrongness, and defending it with vigour. He actually has mellowed over time. I've argued with him from time to time, but I hope the ban isn't too long.Troll...One who purposely and deliberately (that purpose usually being self-amusement) starts an argument in a manner which attacks others on a forum without in any way listening to the arguments proposed by his or her peers. He will spark of such an argument via the use of ad hominem attacks (i.e. 'you're nothing but a fanboy' is a popular phrase) with no substance or relevance to back them up as well as straw man arguments, which he uses to simply avoid addressing the essence of the issue.
LOL, really? Maybe if he could get strait the difference between the criminal code and a bylaw he would. This is the guy that thought he could assault someone because they broke a city bylaw, saying you can citizen's arrest anyone who commits a "crime". Or the difference between the criminal code and the trespass act, or any of his other crazy legal claims.He has himself so convinced he's right that I think he would make a helluva litigator .