Mirage Escorts
Toronto Escorts

Investigation Trump aides may be in legal jeopardy

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,644
5,775
113
Investigation Trump aides may be in legal jeopardy as Democrats give evidence to Mueller:

Adam Schiff says he will hand over transcripts of interviews withheld by Republicans when they controlled committee:

Donald Trump Jr and long-term Trump aide Roger Stone face a heightened threat of criminal charges as Democrats on Capitol Hill prepare to hand evidence to Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

They could be charged with perjury if there is evidence that they lied to Congress during interviews behind closed doors with the House intelligence committee.

The California Democrat Adam Schiff will take over leadership of the committee now that his party has control of the House, following victory in the midterm elections.

Speaking on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, Schiff made clear he would be handing over transcripts which had been withheld from Mueller’s investigation by Republicans when they controlled the panel.

The committee staged 73 interviews with dozens of witnesses, including Jared Kushner, Trump Jr and Stone. Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, has already pleaded guilty to perjury for lying to Congress over attempts to make a deal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Schiff said he was “trying to deconflict” with special counsel Mueller’s investigation because over the last two years the committee, under Republican leadership, had actively tried to make the special counsel’s work more difficult.

Schiff said he planned “as one of our first acts to make the transcripts of our witnesses fully available to special counsel for any purpose, including the bringing of perjury charges”.

Trump Jr is in peril because he orchestrated the now infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians after being promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. He would face problems if he told Congress that his father was unaware of the meeting but Mueller has obtained evidence to contradict that.
Stone has been under scrutiny over whether he joined the Russian conspiracy to hack Democratic party emails and whether he had prior knowledge of their publication by WikiLeaks.

Kushner, Trump’s son in law and senior adviser, has faced questions over his contacts with Russian officials during the transition period between the November 2016 election and the start of the Trump administration in January 2017.

Mueller’s investigation has had access to emails and other records which can be used to test whether witnesses were honest in their evidence to Congress.

Schiff did not name any individuals, but said: “There’s no reason to protect these witnesses. There’s every reason to validate Congress’s interest in not having people come before it and lie.

“I think people felt that they had some kind of immunity when the GOP majority at the time because they would often intervene and tell witnesses, ‘You don’t have to answer that question.’”

Schiff also underlined that his committee will start to investigate the Trump Organization and any possible connections to Russian money.

He said last month he wanted to investigate finances of the Trump Organization, naming Deutsche Bank, which has a history of laundering Russian money and which for a time was the only lender willing to do business with Trump.

On Sunday, Schiff said his committee had gone to work seeking records from private institutions.

Trump has consistently claimed the Mueller investigation into Russian election interference and possible collusion with the Trump campaign is a hoax and a witch-hunt.

On Friday, it was confirmed that judge Beryl Howell, chief judge of US district court in Washington DC, had granted a six-month extension to the grand jury which has been reviewing evidence and recommending or rejecting charges in connection with the Mueller investigation.

Under federal rules, a grand jury can serve no longer than 18 months unless the chief judge extends its service by a period of six months or less, “upon determination that such extension is in the public interest”.

So far, 33 people and three Russian organisations have been charged, convicted or have pleaded guilty in connection with Mueller’s investigation.

Schiff said it was premature to talk about the possible impeachment of Trump, saying “we need to see what Bob Mueller has to say”.

He said impeachment was a theoretical possibility, but could only go ahead if it was a bipartisan process with Senate Republicans in support.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ld-face-perjury-charges-mueller-investigation
 

lumenon9

Member
Feb 6, 2006
230
9
18
Investigation Trump aides may be in legal jeopardy as Democrats give evidence to Mueller:

Adam Schiff says he will hand over transcripts of interviews withheld by Republicans when they controlled committee:

Donald Trump Jr and long-term Trump aide Roger Stone face a heightened threat of criminal charges as Democrats on Capitol Hill prepare to hand evidence to Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

They could be charged with perjury if there is evidence that they lied to Congress during interviews behind closed doors with the House intelligence committee.

The California Democrat Adam Schiff will take over leadership of the committee now that his party has control of the House, following victory in the midterm elections.

Speaking on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, Schiff made clear he would be handing over transcripts which had been withheld from Mueller’s investigation by Republicans when they controlled the panel.

The committee staged 73 interviews with dozens of witnesses, including Jared Kushner, Trump Jr and Stone. Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, has already pleaded guilty to perjury for lying to Congress over attempts to make a deal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Schiff said he was “trying to deconflict” with special counsel Mueller’s investigation because over the last two years the committee, under Republican leadership, had actively tried to make the special counsel’s work more difficult.

Schiff said he planned “as one of our first acts to make the transcripts of our witnesses fully available to special counsel for any purpose, including the bringing of perjury charges”.

Trump Jr is in peril because he orchestrated the now infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians after being promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. He would face problems if he told Congress that his father was unaware of the meeting but Mueller has obtained evidence to contradict that.
Stone has been under scrutiny over whether he joined the Russian conspiracy to hack Democratic party emails and whether he had prior knowledge of their publication by WikiLeaks.

Kushner, Trump’s son in law and senior adviser, has faced questions over his contacts with Russian officials during the transition period between the November 2016 election and the start of the Trump administration in January 2017.

Mueller’s investigation has had access to emails and other records which can be used to test whether witnesses were honest in their evidence to Congress.

Schiff did not name any individuals, but said: “There’s no reason to protect these witnesses. There’s every reason to validate Congress’s interest in not having people come before it and lie.

“I think people felt that they had some kind of immunity when the GOP majority at the time because they would often intervene and tell witnesses, ‘You don’t have to answer that question.’”

Schiff also underlined that his committee will start to investigate the Trump Organization and any possible connections to Russian money.

He said last month he wanted to investigate finances of the Trump Organization, naming Deutsche Bank, which has a history of laundering Russian money and which for a time was the only lender willing to do business with Trump.

On Sunday, Schiff said his committee had gone to work seeking records from private institutions.

Trump has consistently claimed the Mueller investigation into Russian election interference and possible collusion with the Trump campaign is a hoax and a witch-hunt.

On Friday, it was confirmed that judge Beryl Howell, chief judge of US district court in Washington DC, had granted a six-month extension to the grand jury which has been reviewing evidence and recommending or rejecting charges in connection with the Mueller investigation.

Under federal rules, a grand jury can serve no longer than 18 months unless the chief judge extends its service by a period of six months or less, “upon determination that such extension is in the public interest”.

So far, 33 people and three Russian organisations have been charged, convicted or have pleaded guilty in connection with Mueller’s investigation.

Schiff said it was premature to talk about the possible impeachment of Trump, saying “we need to see what Bob Mueller has to say”.

He said impeachment was a theoretical possibility, but could only go ahead if it was a bipartisan process with Senate Republicans in support.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ld-face-perjury-charges-mueller-investigation
Schiff is the new Sherrif in town and ready to re-institute the Rule of Law in the United States. A fucking BULLDOG and Trump and GOP's worst nightmare.

Go Schiff Go.

L
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,644
5,775
113
Schiff is the new Sherrif in town and ready to re-institute the Rule of Law in the United States. A fucking BULLDOG and Trump and GOP's worst nightmare.

Go Schiff Go.

L
The Republicans were fully aware of Trump's corruption, and it was being exposed in stages. No wonder Trump kept on howling about no collusion, and at the same time screaming at his Attorney General who recused himself. That was hilarious, and eventually Trump forced him out. But this has not affected the Mueller investigation, as that will definitely be grounds for impeachment.
 

azeri99

Banned
Sep 19, 2018
949
1
0
The Republicans were fully aware of Trump's corruption, and it was being exposed in stages. No wonder Trump kept on howling about no collusion, and at the same time screaming at his Attorney General who recused himself. That was hilarious, and eventually Trump forced him out. But this has not affected the Mueller investigation, as that will definitely be grounds for impeachment.
It might be grounds for impeachment but lets see if the Democrats have the balls to do it, it all depends on what the report says.If there isn't a smoking gun tying Trump directly to anything then I highly doubt they will
 

wilbur

Active member
Jan 19, 2004
2,079
0
36
It might be grounds for impeachment but lets see if the Democrats have the balls to do it, it all depends on what the report says.If there isn't a smoking gun tying Trump directly to anything then I highly doubt they will
Impossible to impeach without a 66% Senate majority. Never going to happen.

Just amounts to another show trial.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,206
113
Impossible to impeach without a 66% Senate majority. Never going to happen.

Just amounts to another show trial.
If the remaining Republican Senators don't want to loose their seats in future elections they will convict the dirtbag. If they don't follow the rule of law and for all his wrongdoings and lies the Republicans should expect a huge loss in the next elections. Either way Republicans are fucked in the next election regardless of how the Republican Senators vote, there will be a Democratic president. It's just a matter of how much of a majority it will be.

Impeaching the motherfucker will be a great thing not only for the U.S but for the world as it will curb the Nationalist movement that is coming to light around the world. If it doesn't happen expect a lot more countries voting in Nationalist governments, and anyone with half a brain knows what will happen if Nationalist governments come into power around the world.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,206
113
It might be grounds for impeachment but lets see if the Democrats have the balls to do it, it all depends on what the report says.If there isn't a smoking gun tying Trump directly to anything then I highly doubt they will
Spoken like a true Trump supporter in disguise. ;)
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,644
5,775
113
Impossible to impeach without a 66% Senate majority. Never going to happen.

Just amounts to another show trial.
The House of Representatives have the sole right to impeach by a simple majority. But conviction can only be conducted by the Senate with a two-thirds majority. So Trump can be impeached by the Democratic Majority in the House, just as Bill Clinton was. But Clinton's impeachment was overturned in the Senate.
 

azeri99

Banned
Sep 19, 2018
949
1
0
Spoken like a true Trump supporter in disguise. ;)
So if there is no direct evidence linking Trump to anything illegal, he should be impeached anyway? How democratic of you, and I'm not a Trump supporter, I couldn't care less if he's president or not, I just think it's hilarious how you have him convicted already based rumors of what Mueller has. If he did all those things he's accused of then he should go, but i find it hard to believe they have much on him since he never uses email or text messaging, they will have to get him with audio tapes and corroborated witness testimony.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,446
18,448
113
So if there is no direct evidence linking Trump to anything illegal, he should be impeached anyway? How democratic of you, and I'm not a Trump supporter, I couldn't care less if he's president or not, I just think it's hilarious how you have him convicted already based rumors of what Mueller has. If he did all those things he's accused of then he should go, but i find it hard to believe they have much on him since he never uses email or text messaging, they will have to get him with audio tapes and corroborated witness testimony.
Sounds like you also accept that he is likely guilty yet think he should get off if he covered his tracks well enough.
You should also read the evidence so far revealed by Mueller and posted publicly through court docs.
 

azeri99

Banned
Sep 19, 2018
949
1
0
Sounds like you also accept that he is likely guilty yet think he should get off if he covered his tracks well enough.
You should also read the evidence so far revealed by Mueller and posted publicly through court docs.
It depends what he's guilty of, if it's just paying off a porn star and playboy model then no, but if he conspired with Russians or laundered money for them or committed financial fraud then yes he should be impeached, I have read the evidence, other than the campaign finance law based on Cohen's word alone so far, what other evidence have they shown where he has committed a crime, not just based on Cohen's word but actual evidence
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,446
18,448
113
It depends what he's guilty of, if it's just paying off a porn star and playboy model then no, but if he conspired with Russians or laundered money for them or committed financial fraud then yes he should be impeached, I have read the evidence, other than the campaign finance law based on Cohen's word alone so far, what other evidence have they shown where he has committed a crime, not just based on Cohen's word but actual evidence
This is a good summary.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/steved...-exposes-putins-hold-over-trump/#4eb44db648f6
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,206
113
So if there is no direct evidence linking Trump to anything illegal, he should be impeached anyway? How democratic of you, and I'm not a Trump supporter, I couldn't care less if he's president or not, I just think it's hilarious how you have him convicted already based rumors of what Mueller has. If he did all those things he's accused of then he should go, but i find it hard to believe they have much on him since he never uses email or text messaging, they will have to get him with audio tapes and corroborated witness testimony.
You're a Trump supporter in disguise and you know it. You're like Butler very much in how you post telling everyone he is a Sanders supporter but defending almost everything against Trump in his posts and you do the same.
In the same sentence that you say grounds for impeachment, you question the legitimacy of the impeachment so you can argue your point in the future.....that is a Trump supporter in disguise.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
29,022
3,603
113
So if there is no direct evidence linking Trump to anything illegal, he should be impeached anyway? How democratic of you, and I'm not a Trump supporter, I couldn't care less if he's president or not, I just think it's hilarious how you have him convicted already based rumors of what Mueller has. If he did all those things he's accused of then he should go, but i find it hard to believe they have much on him since he never uses email or text messaging, they will have to get him with audio tapes and corroborated witness testimony.
Azer, you have to realize that some of the posters are irrationally emotional about Trump. They still can't get over his win because everyone they trust in the media said it couldn't happen.

They have continued to live in a little bubble and never looked at the state of America. The opioid crisis. The Banking scandals. Over 5 million foreclosures while giving out bonuses. The pro war turn of the media. The immigration issues.

None of that existed in their little world. They didn't see the hurt.

So they need a nefarious reason. To not have one is to admit they were just plain wrong.

And quite frankly they don't have the guts to do it.
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,432
16
38
Azer, you have to realize that some of the posters are irrationally emotional about Trump. They still can't get over his win because everyone they trust in the media said it couldn't happen.

They have continued to live in a little bubble and never looked at the state of America. The opioid crisis. The Banking scandals. Over 5 million foreclosures while giving out bonuses. The pro war turn of the media. The immigration issues.

None of that existed in their little world. They didn't see the hurt.

So they need a nefarious reason. To not have one is to admit they were just plain wrong.

And quite frankly they don't have the guts to do it.
Hilarious. One of the most cowardly posters on the forum talking about "guts". You shouldn't talk about guts when you're afraid to say you support the guy - something 99% of your posts make obvious. Your Sanders BS is a total sham.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
29,022
3,603
113
Hilarious. One of the most cowardly posters on the forum talking about "guts".
I think not. Your problem is you don't see support for protest candidates as something that can occur. I've seen articles and others media showing Bernie supporters who voted for Trump.

Both are Anti War. Both are against Globalism. Bernie was obviously the better choice but Clinton was the worst one.

It's that simple.

I'm sorry your Globalist war mongering for cash has been temporarily disrupted. Thems the brakes I guess.
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,432
16
38
i think not. Your problem is you don't see support for protest candidates as something that can occur. I've seen articles and others media showing bernie supporters who voted for trump.

Both are anti war. Both are against globalism. Bernie was obviously the better choice but clinton was the worst one.

It's that simple.

I'm sorry your globalist war mongering for cash has been temporarily disrupted. Thems the brakes i guess.
lol.
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,906
1,206
113
I think not. Your problem is you don't see support for protest candidates as something that can occur. I've seen articles and others media showing Bernie supporters who voted for Trump.

Both are Anti War. Both are against Globalism. Bernie was obviously the better choice but Clinton was the worst one.

It's that simple.

I'm sorry your Globalist war mongering for cash has been temporarily disrupted. Thems the brakes I guess.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
:bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2:

Anyone curious to know what a load of crap looks like take a look at Butlers statement. Enough said.
Remember this is a guy who is riding a street car talking about buying a 50-60' yacht, also a guy who is a Trump supporter posing as a Sanders fan. People like him are out of touch with the reality of who they are.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
29,022
3,603
113
See azer. This one supposedly works in Financial Services. In other words a Bankster drone. Happy to see payoffs to politicians.

No borders, no immigration rules, means weakened govt's and more power to Corporations. And screw the little guy.

That's what this one believes in.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
29,022
3,603
113
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
:bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2::bump2:
This one is really emotional about the whole thing. Gets crazy about it. He would be a happy supporter of a Sen. McCarthy style set of hearings.

No need for the truth, just get him and screw due process.
 
Toronto Escorts