Wounded Warrior Project execs fired

twizz

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
1,973
0
0
Last Updated Mar 10, 2016 8:11 PM EST

The two top executives of Wounded Warrior Project were fired Thursday by the board of directors.

Americans donate hundreds of millions of dollars each year to the charity, expecting their money will help some of the 52,000 wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But CBS News found Wounded Warrior Project spends 40 to 50 percent on overhead, including extravagant parties. Other veterans charities have overhead costs of 10 to 15 percent.

Wounded Warrior Project's Chief Executive Officer, Steven Nardizzi, and Chief Operating Officer, Al Giordano, were fired after a meeting Thursday afternoon in New York.

By appealing to America's generosity, Wounded Warrior Project raised more than a billion dollars in donations since 2003 -- $300 million in 2014 alone.

But while the money was pouring in, it was also flowing out on lavish employee conferences -- $26 million in 2014.

Donors outraged by Wounded Warrior Project expenditures

"Let's get a Mexican mariachi band in there, let's get maracas made with the WWP logo put them on every staff member's desk. Lets get it catered, have a big old party," said Eric Millette, a retired army staff sergeant.

He took a job with Wounded Warrior as a motivational speaker, but after two years he quit.

"I'll be damned if you're gonna take hard-working Americans' money and drink it and waste it, instead of helping those brave men and women who gave you the freedom to walk the face of this earth."

More than 40 former employees told CBS News that spending by the charity was out of control. Two former employees were so fearful of retaliation they asked us not to show their faces.

Wounded Warrior Project now on Charity Navigator's watch list

"It was extremely extravagant. Dinners and alcohol and and, just total excess," one said. "I mean, it's what the military calls fraud waste and abuse."

Former employees also told us the excessive spending began when Nardizzi took over as CEO in 2009. They point to the 2014 annual meeting at a luxury resort in Colorado Springs as typical of his style.

"He rappelled down the side of a building. He's come in on a Segway. He's come in on a horse."

Nardizzi has defended the charity's spending. "If your only fixation is spending the most on programs, that's feeling good, but not necessarily doing good," he said.


Former Wounded Warrior employees accuse charity of wasting millions

But many major donors were outraged, including Fred and Dianne Kane. They raised $325,000 with golf tournaments, and are not pleased with allegations that only a little over half of donations went to help wounded vets.

"I feel like I am representing all these people who have donated over the years, all these seniors over 65 sending $19 month, all these people on fixed incomes," Fred said. "If no one is going to talk about this right now and it has to be me, then it has to be me."

Fred continued, saying he is done with WWP except for his new mission of trying to see change within the organization.

Sources tell CBS News the board has received preliminary results of a financial audit. And there are discussions under way about retired senior military officers who are being considered to take over leadership of the organization.

Late Thursday night, the Wounded Warrior Project released the following statement:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/wounded-warrior-project-ceo-and-coo-fired/
 
Have not those execs broken some law ?

If not, why not?

Firing seems way to light. Seize their assets and have them do community service for life.

The purpose of punishment is to stop crime.
 
This happens ALOT more then people think.I have a very hard time giving to organized, corporate charities now.Any monies i do give, goes to street level organizations.I've found the more organized the charity, the more organized(read:harder to detect) the corruption.
 
I've given to this charity. Not happy about this to say the least. Shame on these two. The question I have is where were the auditors. This has been going on apparently since 2009!
 
A great many people think that charities should be donating all or most of the money to the cause.

Well, the fact of the matter is that you have staff and those people need to be paid a decent salary, more if they are highly skilled. It's very naïve to think that all money given to charity should go right to the cause. Do you work for free?

Now that said, these guys are guilty of exorbitant spending it would appear. I will also wager that their salaries were equally obscene. The optics certainly don't look good. This charity appeals to the mom and pop, apple pie and Chevrolet crowd in the USA. These types don't take kindly to the Armani suit crowd taking them for a ride.
 
A great many people think that charities should be donating all or most of the money to the cause.

Well, the fact of the matter is that you have staff and those people need to be paid a decent salary, more if they are highly skilled. It's very naïve to think that all money given to charity should go right to the cause. Do you work for free?

Now that said, these guys are guilty of exorbitant spending it would appear. I will also wager that their salaries were equally obscene. The optics certainly don't look good. This charity appeals to the mom and pop, apple pie and Chevrolet crowd in the USA. These types don't take kindly to the Armani suit crowd taking them for a ride.

I think a reasonable administrative cost of a charity is between 15-20% of total donations received. Seems WWP wasn't even close to this.
 
I think a reasonable administrative cost of a charity is between 15-20% of total donations received. Seems WWP wasn't even close to this.

For a charity just raking in the money like WWP, I would agree with you completely. 300 million in 2014 alone. That's incredible. It should be no sweat to administer a program like WWP with a budget of 45 million bucks. Seriously.