http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/13/teacher.porn.ap/index.html
Yet another totally ridiculous prosecution from the US because it involves *gasp* sex, *gasp* kids, and *gasp* the internet.
This woman was a quiet suburban housewife who took substitute teaching assignments. She's not particularly computer savvy.
In the 7th grade class she was monitoring, the kids used the classroom computer to view a hairstyling website. They then got re-directed to a porno site with infinitely looping pop-ups. She tried, in vain, to close all the windows.
She's already been convicted of distributing porn to minors, and she's appealing her case. The prosecution never bothered to examine the computer for spyware, and the school admitted that they let the firewall subscription lapse. No physical mouse clicks are necessary for the pop-ups, yet the prosecution claims that she intentionally clicked on all the porn.
So many people here, including the authorities, don't seem to be too computer-literate about what we've all experienced. WTF?!
Yet another totally ridiculous prosecution from the US because it involves *gasp* sex, *gasp* kids, and *gasp* the internet.
This woman was a quiet suburban housewife who took substitute teaching assignments. She's not particularly computer savvy.
In the 7th grade class she was monitoring, the kids used the classroom computer to view a hairstyling website. They then got re-directed to a porno site with infinitely looping pop-ups. She tried, in vain, to close all the windows.
She's already been convicted of distributing porn to minors, and she's appealing her case. The prosecution never bothered to examine the computer for spyware, and the school admitted that they let the firewall subscription lapse. No physical mouse clicks are necessary for the pop-ups, yet the prosecution claims that she intentionally clicked on all the porn.
So many people here, including the authorities, don't seem to be too computer-literate about what we've all experienced. WTF?!