Why some women choose to ignore their husband's infidelities (Good article!)

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/relationships/article5280408.ece

On the day the first reports of Gordon Ramsay’s extramarital activities broke, the man himself was at Babington House, recovering from a friend’s birthday party the night before. Staff quietly removed every copy of the offending paper, so that Ramsay and his pals were protected from the awkward modern inconvenience of a kiss-and-tell exposé.

Many families go through Ramsayesque domestic nightmares and survive. They may not have a business empire at stake, but there is still the family brand to protect, and women are prepared to put up with terrible behaviour to safeguard it. Tana joins Princess Diana, Victoria Beckham, Hillary Clinton and Mary Archer — women who have all stood at the garden gate in front of the press.

“Ramsay is such a force of nature. I guess his wife thinks it comes with the territory. He is publicly very faithful to Tana,” says Style’s agony aunt, Sally Brampton. “Relationships are agreements, and just because you break the rules of society, it does not mean you are breaking the terms of that unique agreement.”

One successful businessman I know, a serial cheater, says drily: “Playing away is not good for the balance and harmony at home, so I keep it quiet, although men do talk about it among themselves.” (Yes - there is Terb lol)

The businessman continues: “Most relationships start with passionate love or lust. Neither of these last, but the relationships often do. Many people need bursts of passion or lust. If their spouse accepts this, they may continue to be happy; if not, they might be driven apart and the cycle is repeated. If the mistress is tolerated or kept secret, what I would call the ‘sub-relationship’ can be long-lasting and to the benefit of all concerned.”

Another man describes how his occasional straying “can have a therapeutic effect on the relationship. It often makes you realise you are better off where you are — the grass is not greener — and reinforces your commitment to the relationship”.

Many wives are pragmatic about this state of affairs. As the wife of two unfaithful men, Annabel Goldsmith said in 1987: “I can never understand the wives who really mind, the wives who set such store by fidelity. How extraordinary and how mad they are. Because, surely, if the man goes out and he comes back, it’s not actually doing any harm.” Goldsmith was the late Jimmy Goldsmith’s mistress before she was his wife. It was he, of course, who uttered the memorable truism: “If you marry your mistress, you create a vacancy.”

Alpha males, like rock stars, MPs, princes and tycoons, with their incredible egos and rampant, childlike need for attention, wealth and opportunity, are particularly prone to such behaviour. The wives of these men develop blind spots and coping mechanisms to sustain the the family. The divorce lawyer Vanessa Lloyd Platt says: “Three-quarters of the powerful men in this country are having affairs in some form or another. Some of those affairs last 10 years without the wife, apparently, knowing. Women come to us to find out what their husbands are up to, and if it transpires he is having an affair, it’s not a given they will divorce him. Often they’ll say the reason they’re not leaving is, ‘He’s such a character, I will never meet someone like that again.’ It can be fine for years, and then the men actually fall in love, usually with a younger version of the wife. That’s when trouble starts, and when I meet them, they are very angry.”

The extramarital affair is more common than divorce, though independent working women are more likely to leave unfaithful husbands as they have less fear of coping with life alone. “Infidelity is not always a sackable offence,” says Rowan Pelling, former editor of the The Erotic Review. “In all the uproar and scandal, people forget marriage is an alliance. Men are like egotistical little boys — ambitious and driven ones even more so. They need constant attention, and when you have kids, some women will think, ‘Oh god, let someone else take up that slack.’ ” :D

I spoke to one person in the Ramsay camp who said Gordon was like a child in a sweetshop, with adoring women making silly eyes at him. “You’d need to be a very strong man to resist that kind of attention and opportunity. I’m not sure I could.”

For a certain type of wife, however, a mistress can be a blessing. “I didn’t want to have sex,” says one Hampshire mother of two. “So I told him, ‘The ideal situation is for you to go and get a mistress. I don’t care who she is, just as long as she is kept out of our lives.’ There was nothing sexual left in our marriage; it was something I had to force myself to do every few months. I thought we would struggle on if he was getting regular sex and attention from another woman, and then we could just get on with being friends and having a family. I think, as a society, we’re morally squeamish about the practicalities of farming out sex to another woman, but I have a couple of girlfriends who say, ‘I don’t care if he’s getting it elsewhere. I just don’t want to know about it.’ ”

If you talk to the hairdressers and beauty-parlour confidantes of some of the richest wives in London, you’ll hear the same story again and again. “It’s different for those women,” says one. “They don’t marry for love — the families push them together or the woman marries the man for his money. A lot of wives turn a blind eye, but they lay out ground rules: the other woman can’t be a scrubber, in case she goes to the press or gets pregnant, and she can’t be too beautiful or he’ll leave the wife for her.”

One £200-an-hour beauty professional pointed out that if all other wives in a social group are putting up with it, you will too. Infidelity becomes socially acceptable.
 

DeerHunterA1

New member
May 22, 2008
359
0
0
What era do the women referred to in this article belong to? Clearly they are not the empowered, Operha Winfrey-fed under 35s.

I find the quote of Ann goldsmith particularly interesting: "I can never understand the wives who really mind, the wives who set such store by fidelity. How extraordinary and how mad they are. Because, surely, if the man goes out and he comes back, it’s not actually doing any harm."

What about the crushed feelings? What about the violation of the trust? And the realisation your marriage isn't what you thought it was? The feeling of loss must be utterly traumatic!

The part about wealthy men was laughable! Ok maybe they are cheating at that rate, but for god's sake the women would leave them in a second! It saves their perceived honour and nets them a MASSIVE alimony! It also punishes them, embarrases them and allows the women to move on.
 

capncrunch

New member
Apr 1, 2007
1,802
3
0
Hank250 said:
What about the crushed feelings? What about the violation of the trust? And the realisation your marriage isn't what you thought it was? The feeling of loss must be utterly traumatic!
Is it any different for the man to realize that he's found himself in a sexless, loveless marriage? Is that not a violation of trust as well?

This is how I read it: "Go ahead, dear, have an affair. I know I promised you a life of companionship, pleasure and children, but I've changed my mind on the sex bit. Too bad, so sad. So by all means diddle with little Mary at the office. Just make sure you bring home your paycheque to MY house."
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,602
225
63
The Keebler Factory
Sounds like an article by cheaters, about cheaters, for cheaters.

This isn't an article about the empowerment of cheating. It's about women who are doormats. And in the case of powerful/famous men, it's probably more about women who would rather put up with cheating than lose the lifestyle they've become accustomed to.

In all respects, not very healthy.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,030
3,878
113
Keebler Elf said:
Sounds like an article by cheaters, about cheaters, for cheaters.

This isn't an article about the empowerment of cheating. It's about women who are doormats. And in the case of powerful/famous men, it's probably more about women who would rather put up with cheating than lose the lifestyle they've become accustomed to.

In all respects, not very healthy.
Uhhh, did you forget what board you're posting on?

This is a board for mostly married or otherwise attached men who like to have sex with prostitutes for many a reason.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,030
3,878
113
My take on it is simple....

Monogomany is not natural for humans. Monogomany = monotony.

Men just want variety in the bedroom, probably not to change wives.

Women, god only knows what they want.

Simple solution - have an open relationship. Either party is free to have sex with anyone anytime they desire and the other is not going to get all worked up about it. (Hopefully, you can still have sex with your S.O. also.)
 

capncrunch

New member
Apr 1, 2007
1,802
3
0
james t kirk said:
Women, god only knows what they want.
There's really no point in trying to figure that out. Even Dr Freud said,
The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is "What does a woman want?"
If Freud couldn't figure it out, mere mortals like ourselves haven't got a prayer.

But there is a silver lining.

Women don't know what they want either.
 

N Able Me

Banned
Nov 30, 2008
30
0
0
I don't think that women "ignore" their husband's infidelities when they are discovered. Most, I think, are very hurt. There are many reasons that people stay in bad marriages (e.g., financial, convenience, "for the children"). I think that women who choose to stay married after such a discovery are doing so for reasons they believe are justified. Each person is different. Some people are forgiving and optimistic, while others hold grudges and see the worst in situations. Different people make different choices in the same situation.
 
Toronto Escorts