Blondie Massage Spa

Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,792
2,805
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Just borrowed this book from the Library



Philosophy professor Christina Sommers has exposed a disturbing development: how a group of zealots, claiming to speak for all women, are promoting a dangerous new agenda that threatens our most cherished ideals and sets women against men in all spheres of life. In case after case, Sommers shows how these extremists have propped up their arguments with highly questionable but well-funded research, presenting inflammatory and often inaccurate information and stifling any semblance of free and open scrutiny. Trumpeted as orthodoxy, the resulting "findings" on everything from rape to domestic abuse to economic bias to the supposed crisis in girls' self-esteem perpetuate a view of women as victims of the "patriarchy". Moreover, these arguments and the supposed facts on which they are based have had enormous influence beyond the academy, where they have shaken the foundations of our educational, scientific, and legal institutions and have fostered resentment and alienation in our private lives. Despite its current dominance, Sommers maintains, such a breed of feminism is at odds with the real aspirations and values of most American women and undermines the cause of true equality. Who Stole Feminism? is a call to arms that will enrage or inspire, but cannot be ignored.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
But haven`t had time to read it though;

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/who...ina-hoff-sommers/1111753469?ean=9780684801568

Overview
Philosophy professor Christina Sommers has exposed a disturbing development: how a group of zealots, claiming to speak for all women, are promoting a dangerous new agenda that threatens our most cherished ideals and sets women against men in all spheres of life. In case after case, Sommers shows how these extremists have propped up their arguments with highly questionable but well-funded research, presenting inflammatory and often inaccurate information and stifling any semblance of free and open scrutiny. Trumpeted as orthodoxy, the resulting "findings" on everything from rape to domestic abuse to economic bias to the supposed crisis in girls` self-esteem perpetuate a view of women as victims of the "patriarchy." Moreover, these arguments and the supposed facts on which they are based have had enormous influence beyond the academy, where they have shaken the foundations of our educational, scientific, and legal institutions and have fostered resentment and alienation in our private lives. Despite its current dominance, Sommers maintains, such a breed of feminism is at odds with the real aspirations and values of most American women and undermines the cause of true equality. Who Stole Feminism? is a call to arms that will enrage or inspire, but cannot be ignored.
You`re taking a page out of LH`s book though and starting multiple threads on the same subject.

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?470760-RadFem-%91No-Woman-Is-Heterosexual%92

Are you thinking of changing sides?

Get back to us `after` you`ve read the book and give us a summary.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,792
2,805
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
i just borrowed the book today.


quote in Chapter 1

The New feminism emphasizes the importance of the "women's point of view," the old Feminism believes in the primary importance of the human being

Winifred Holtby, 1926
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
People should only read differing points of view if they're planning to agree with them?
Then again people shouldn't C&P a review of the book and try and pass it off as theirs. You do that quite a few times and fail almost every time.

As I suggested you read it all and get back to us with a review in your own words.

One of the comments that follow the B&N description makes me pause;

Library Journal
In this jeremiad, Sommers (philosophy, Clark Univ.) takes out after antimale ``gender feminists'' who willfully, she contends, distort information on women's status to keep their lock on government and foundation money. Their dark agenda includes silencing sensible ``equity feminists,'' who celebrate women's achievements and who seek, in partnership with men, to make the few minor adjustments needed for perfect equity. Her chief disagreement with ``gender feminists'' concerns their belief that gender bias is so ingrained that we are frequently unaware of its influence. Unfortunately, Sommers's scornful tone makes her reporting suspect; she mocks the arguments she opposes rather than engaging and refuting them. She is strongest when she criticizes the methodology of some well-known feminist research, but she undermines her credibility when she fails to apply her own standards to studies that suit her position. This book will have as an audience readers who share her politics. [BOMC alternate.]-Cynthia Harrison, Federal Judicial Ctr., Washington, D.C.
You might want to look up the word jeremiad. to says oodles.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,792
2,805
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com


another book on my reading list


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Morning_After_(book)

To Katie Roiphe, feminism had always meant freedom — but as an undergraduate at Harvard and a graduate at Princeton, she was shocked to discover that the same movement that had once promised women a voice was now being used to tell them what they ought to say and think and feel. This book arose out of her frustration with today's feminism and with the hypocrisy of a culture that idealizes freedom of speech but refuses to tolerate real dissent.

In The Morning After, Roiphe takes an uncomfortably close look at how that intolerance is manifest, offering penetrating critiques of our urge to legislate love and desire, our infatuation with consent, and our unreasonable fear of the human imagination, which is expected to stoop before rules about sex and gender. Ground-breaking and controversial, The Morning After inspired heated debate the world over. Now read it and make up your own mind.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,085
1
0
Get back to us 'AFTER' you've read it and give us a review.

The lists of books you're 'GOING' to read is stretching down the street. How was the Sommers book? Did it measure up to the B&N review?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,792
2,805
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Get back to us 'AFTER' you've read it and give us a review.

The lists of books you're 'GOING' to read is stretching down the street. How was the Sommers book? Did it measure up to the B&N review?
I just finished reading chapter 10.
 

rafterman

A sadder and a wiser man
Feb 15, 2004
3,484
80
48
Curious to see if any of the ladies will chime in with their perspective.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts