I read this a few days ago and started thinking about it. Here is a snippet of the entire article. It is pretty much self-explanatory. Apparently they did this in the NBA a few years back. I do not follow the NBA anymore, other than looking up at the occassional Celtic highlight or glancing over the headlines on the Boston Globe website. Perhaps Bob McCowan could explain it to me.
Discussion: Which Contract Would You Get Rid Of?
By Mike Axisa [June 22 at 9:00pm CST]
In his Hardball column yesterday, Joel Sherman of the New York Post says that MLB should allow a "one-time, one-contract reprieve for all 30 teams." Similar to what the NBA did in 2005, Sherman basically says each team should be allowed to rid themselves of one contract, with MLB's central fund absorbing the money owed to the players. Those 30 players would then become free agents.
Okay - so, if you were an MLB GM, which contract would you like to get rid of?
I will start with my Red Sox, however, it us a toss up between two players. Julio Lugo at $9MM per season til the end of 2010. He is going to be released anyways, as soon as Jed Lowrie returns. Lugo has been a total bust. One could argue that JD Drew has not been worth the $14 MM per season (til the end of 2010) but at least he has done more than Lugo, so I could live with that one. Lastly, Dice-K is becoming Dud-K. I posted the details of his contract in another thread, but he will get somewhere around $10MM per season and will be around until 2012. Forget that $51 MM posting fee the Sox had to pay just to talk to him, that was paid to his former team the Seibu Lions, so Boston wouldn't get that back under this scenario. Hard choice Dice-K or Lugo. Since Dice-K has a longer contract, I would choose him to go.
How about other contracts throughout MLB? Barry Zito? A-Rod? CC or AJ? I am sure Jays fans would like to see at least one contract dumped.
Discussion: Which Contract Would You Get Rid Of?
By Mike Axisa [June 22 at 9:00pm CST]
In his Hardball column yesterday, Joel Sherman of the New York Post says that MLB should allow a "one-time, one-contract reprieve for all 30 teams." Similar to what the NBA did in 2005, Sherman basically says each team should be allowed to rid themselves of one contract, with MLB's central fund absorbing the money owed to the players. Those 30 players would then become free agents.
Okay - so, if you were an MLB GM, which contract would you like to get rid of?
I will start with my Red Sox, however, it us a toss up between two players. Julio Lugo at $9MM per season til the end of 2010. He is going to be released anyways, as soon as Jed Lowrie returns. Lugo has been a total bust. One could argue that JD Drew has not been worth the $14 MM per season (til the end of 2010) but at least he has done more than Lugo, so I could live with that one. Lastly, Dice-K is becoming Dud-K. I posted the details of his contract in another thread, but he will get somewhere around $10MM per season and will be around until 2012. Forget that $51 MM posting fee the Sox had to pay just to talk to him, that was paid to his former team the Seibu Lions, so Boston wouldn't get that back under this scenario. Hard choice Dice-K or Lugo. Since Dice-K has a longer contract, I would choose him to go.
How about other contracts throughout MLB? Barry Zito? A-Rod? CC or AJ? I am sure Jays fans would like to see at least one contract dumped.