When Will Canada Get This??

Sammy the Bull

Gravano
Apr 18, 2009
1,038
0
0
Any techies in the house?? When will we get 100mb down speeds on our internetzies??
Soon I hope!! I like the idea of downloading an HD movie in 10 minutes :)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8424401.stm

Great Britain to complete super-fast broadband network by 2012

BT's superfast broadband network will be completed in time for the 2012 Olympic Games, the firm has announced.
The £1.5bn fibre-optic network will offer speeds of up to 100 Megabits per second (Mbps) for some customers, supporting high-definition video. However, it will only reach around 40% of homes, mainly in towns and cities.

The firm had originally said the programme would be completed by March 2013 but said the rollout was now "ahead of schedule" .
"Given the progress we're making, four million homes will have access to fibre by the end of next year," said Ian Livingston, CEO of BT.
He said the firm aims to offer 10m homes access to the fibre network "by the time the games begin" on the 27 July.
The firm currently has 5m customers.

But extending the coverage would "inevitably involve support from the public sector", he added.
Customers will be able to access the highest speeds where BT runs fibre-optic cables all the way to their home.
However, the network will still offer speeds of up to 40 Mbps in areas where the fibre cable is run to BT-owned cabinets. In these fibre-to-the-cabinet areas, homes will still be connected to the cabinets by slower copper cables.
Currently, BT's rival Virgin Media offers some homes broadband speeds of up to 50 Mbps over fibre, regarded as super-fast broadband.

The UK government has said it wants super-fast broadband available to 90% of the country by the end of 2017 and everyone in the country to have access to broadband speeds of 2Mbps by 2012.
However, Mr Livingston called for further clarity from the UK government.
"If you look around the world, several governments are pro-actively supporting the roll out of fibre broadband," he said.

"There's still a debate in the UK - which is fine - but we need our politicians to decide how much of a priority fibre broadband is."
The government plans to introduce an annual tax of £6 to fund the rollout of broadband, particularly for rural areas
 

Cassini

Active member
Jan 17, 2004
1,162
0
36
Never.

It is almost impossible to have true competition in Canada's phone and internet marketplace. The Bell and Rogers duopoly in many metropolitan areas is but another example of this. The issue with Canada is the economics of the vast distances have large influences on your ability to get infrastructure installed to your house.
 

JohnHenry

Well-known member
Aug 27, 2003
1,344
315
83
rural ontario
Its a question of will not competition. Wightman Communications managed to install fibre optic to every house in Mount Forest. Bell brought in a back hoe, and horizontal boring equipment to deliver copper wiring to my house when they could just have easily installed fibre optic. When we asked Bell why they wouldn't provide DSL, their answer was that it was not profitable, even though, according to the installer, the substation could easily be upgraded.
 

LazMan

New member
Sep 19, 2004
314
0
0
Barrie-Area
Without getting too far down the rabbit-hole; it's economies of scale. There's just so damn much of Canada that deployment costs, and RoI are killers.

Wightman, and a few other small companies are offering triple-play in a FIOS like way, and Bell and TELUS are doing limited trials of FTTH.

Rogers does offer 50M services now; and with DOCSIS 3 being rolled out, 100Meg will be an option fairly soon...

It's coming - but not any time soon!
 

to-guy69

New member
Mar 28, 2004
1,469
0
0
Sonic Temple
We are like Australia in that we have too much land with not enough people....that's alot of network to cover for such a small population. Given that as well as the CRTC, we will never be at the forefront of bandwidth supremacy.
 

Sammy the Bull

Gravano
Apr 18, 2009
1,038
0
0
We are like Australia in that we have too much land with not enough people....that's alot of network to cover for such a small population
Can't they start with the big cities first?? 80% of Canadians live in the big cities.
So you start with TO, Montreal, Van...etc, that should take care of the first 15 million people or so
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts