What will be the least Risky after Sharia law 36?

Which is the least Risky?

  • Visiting a Well known Agency Incall

    Votes: 13 34.2%
  • Visiting a well known Massage Parlour

    Votes: 16 42.1%
  • Going to a strip club in search of extras

    Votes: 6 15.8%
  • Going to a random BP Incall

    Votes: 3 7.9%

  • Total voters
    38

shogun89

New member
Feb 18, 2013
873
2
0
I'm guessing strip clubs will be the least risky to begin with at least, but it could be wrong.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
I say visiting a REPUTABLE MP, however, it's not intended to substitute for full-service SPs.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,489
11
38
I say visiting a REPUTABLE MP, however, it's not intended to substitute for full-service SPs.
Which also goes for SCs. However the Pollster screwed his own results by adding the special 'in search of extras' condition to it alone. Of course only guys whose over-fat wallets have addled their brains have ever done that. But that would still make for some 'yeses', and some danger.

Since we all know MPs have never offered sex (whatever individual MPAs may have done in secrecy), and they also have licenses and leases to safeguard but with fewer inspectors to satisfy, they'd be slightly more dangerous, if guys were dumb enough to ask anyone with any clothes on for extras. But that would let TERBians out, presumably why it wasn't part of the question.

Of course going anywhere specifically to buy sexual 'extras' would be very unsafe, unless you knew the establishment was a) reputable and b) operated discreetly and without troubling its neighbours.
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,759
520
113
I am basically going to stick with established indy providers, who are well versed on bill C36.
I've got my list already made up along with a few of my favourite agency girls. No one likes this law but all we can do for now is work around it. And for godsake stop complaining about it, it's here to stay until a SCC challenge gets underway so get your shit together and get yourself prepared. And stop making comments about how if JT becomes PM he will change everything. Justin has already stated publicly that he opposes legalized prostitution and that he believes it to be a form of violence against women and also abusive so he can't come out later and say he's going to scrap the law.
 

zefroggy

Member
Dec 5, 2012
580
3
18
Toronto
None of the above.

I have been thinking about starting a new artistic hobby (will need to work on my painting skills, but that's beyond the point) and look for nude models for my art. If it so happen that that we hit it off and my YMMV goes beyond simple posing, this would have neither been discussed or be the cause for compensation.

All kidding aside, I will stay away from incalls, BP and Strip Clubs. The last one may seem stupid, but it seems that I am a very funny, friendly drunk and I rarely leave a SC without some kind of sexual service. This is also why I will stay away from SC in the US, as my last time I ended up getting CFS in the VIP room. (queue the drunken stupor excuse)

So, the plan is to stick with the friends I know. Invite them for dinner or drinks and see how things go from there. My main sticking point will be compensation. How do you pay someone without paying them? I have helped some SPs in need without asking for anything in exchange because they were in a bind. As long as the intent is the same, everything after is friendship.
 

thirdcup

Well-known member
Jan 4, 2005
1,341
113
63
Directly above the center of the earth
Least risky would be a session with your wife or Rosy Palm in your own home. It will also be the least costly and the least fun. - Three leastS, A triple.
 

Siocnarf

New member
Aug 14, 2014
358
0
0
Least risky would be a session with your wife...
And if she gets pregnant, we get a nice tax cut. C-36 and income splitting: now there's just no excuse not to be a stay at home mom.

Seriously, least risky would be reputable indies. Random BP can be stings (though unlikely), and agencies can attract LE attention for many reasons. Indies are more likely to be left alone. For an agency I guess outcall would be better: less risk of getting complains from neighbors.
 

d_jedi

New member
Sep 5, 2005
8,765
1
0
Least risky would be a session with your wife or Rosy Palm in your own home. It will also be the least costly and the least fun. - Three leastS, A triple.
She gets around, doesn't she?
Not much of a looker, but available on a moment's notice..
 

zefroggy

Member
Dec 5, 2012
580
3
18
Toronto
Honestly I think the ladies who work on retainer and the gents who contract them will be the safest and most discreet members of the new hobby world. I can see this becoming more and more popular with those who prefer to see the same lady or ladies on a somewhat regular basis, if the ladies accept that sort of agreement.
This would be a mistress and I doubt you can come after someone under C-36 for that. This has been happening for the longest time. You cannot be prosecuted for supporting an artist or a friend.

Actually, some companies, including the one I work for include options to split your paycheques in multiple accounts. Pretty neat feature, I have been using to manage my play money in a separate account. Could go to support a friend in need.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,364
4,564
113
I'm going with outcalls to hotels for now. Probably make runs to Niagara and Montreal so I can justify the room to the SO.

I prefer to have control over the location. And I figure il stick with agencies for one very good reason. If she is on the roster then it's guaranteed she is vetted as an actual provider by the agency. No need to worry about a sting.

I suppose a good reviewed indy would work but it like the 22-25 age range so it's tough to find that in indies.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,489
11
38
You left outcalls off your list. I think those might be best.
And how will you determine the 'agency's' phone isn't being answered by a cop? Or that the cutie-who arrives at your door doesn't pack a badge?

Before C36, your deal with her—cop or not—was legal. After C36, you're another potential arrest.
 

Yoga Face

New member
Jun 30, 2009
6,328
19
0
Best way to play safe will be to read review boards like TERB

As for which playground is the safest will shall soon find out where the cops want to waste their resources

The riskiest will be

1 Street walkers. Hard to see that playground surviving which is a good thing IMHO


2 Agencies or MPs that employ forced or underage labor so stick with reputable agencies or MPs
 

Born2Star

Active member
Dec 2, 2004
760
83
28
The riskiest will be
1 Street walkers. Hard to see that playground surviving which is a good thing IMHO
2 Agencies or MPs that employ forced or underage labor so stick with reputable agencies or MPs
These two are always the riskiest before and after C36 anyway.

No matter what, the whole industry will take a hit. And judging from how busy recently some of the MP that I've been to I see a group of people's gonna quit going for a while.

I can see Indy and others going for their reg-only mode for a while. Incall / outcall. To those of you who have gained some trust being a repeat this might be the time when it pays off. Loyalty has its rewards.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
Which also goes for SCs. However the Pollster screwed his own results by adding the special 'in search of extras' condition to it alone. Of course only guys whose over-fat wallets have addled their brains have ever done that. But that would still make for some 'yeses', and some danger.

Since we all know MPs have never offered sex (whatever individual MPAs may have done in secrecy), and they also have licenses and leases to safeguard but with fewer inspectors to satisfy, they'd be slightly more dangerous, if guys were dumb enough to ask anyone with any clothes on for extras. But that would let TERBians out, presumably why it wasn't part of the question.

Of course going anywhere specifically to buy sexual 'extras' would be very unsafe, unless you knew the establishment was a) reputable and b) operated discreetly and without troubling its neighbours.

I say it's worse at an SC because you're not inside a room, you can't be naked, and there's no massage table to substantiate my body massage.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
This would be a mistress and I doubt you can come after someone under C-36 for that. This has been happening for the longest time. You cannot be prosecuted for supporting an artist or a friend.

Actually, some companies, including the one I work for include options to split your paycheques in multiple accounts. Pretty neat feature, I have been using to manage my play money in a separate account. Could go to support a friend in need.
Separate accounts? That's incredible. Usually, direct deposit programs only allow one account. Certain employees who want to hide money would love this (as long as nobody else sees their pay stub).
 
Toronto Escorts