Which also goes for SCs. However the Pollster screwed his own results by adding the special 'in search of extras' condition to it alone. Of course only guys whose over-fat wallets have addled their brains have ever done that. But that would still make for some 'yeses', and some danger.I say visiting a REPUTABLE MP, however, it's not intended to substitute for full-service SPs.
I am basically going to stick with established indy providers, who are well versed on bill C36.Going to an MP just to cuddle. ;-)
I've got my list already made up along with a few of my favourite agency girls. No one likes this law but all we can do for now is work around it. And for godsake stop complaining about it, it's here to stay until a SCC challenge gets underway so get your shit together and get yourself prepared. And stop making comments about how if JT becomes PM he will change everything. Justin has already stated publicly that he opposes legalized prostitution and that he believes it to be a form of violence against women and also abusive so he can't come out later and say he's going to scrap the law.I am basically going to stick with established indy providers, who are well versed on bill C36.
And if she gets pregnant, we get a nice tax cut. C-36 and income splitting: now there's just no excuse not to be a stay at home mom.Least risky would be a session with your wife...
She gets around, doesn't she?Least risky would be a session with your wife or Rosy Palm in your own home. It will also be the least costly and the least fun. - Three leastS, A triple.
This would be a mistress and I doubt you can come after someone under C-36 for that. This has been happening for the longest time. You cannot be prosecuted for supporting an artist or a friend.Honestly I think the ladies who work on retainer and the gents who contract them will be the safest and most discreet members of the new hobby world. I can see this becoming more and more popular with those who prefer to see the same lady or ladies on a somewhat regular basis, if the ladies accept that sort of agreement.
And how will you determine the 'agency's' phone isn't being answered by a cop? Or that the cutie-who arrives at your door doesn't pack a badge?You left outcalls off your list. I think those might be best.
These two are always the riskiest before and after C36 anyway.The riskiest will be
1 Street walkers. Hard to see that playground surviving which is a good thing IMHO
2 Agencies or MPs that employ forced or underage labor so stick with reputable agencies or MPs
Which also goes for SCs. However the Pollster screwed his own results by adding the special 'in search of extras' condition to it alone. Of course only guys whose over-fat wallets have addled their brains have ever done that. But that would still make for some 'yeses', and some danger.
Since we all know MPs have never offered sex (whatever individual MPAs may have done in secrecy), and they also have licenses and leases to safeguard but with fewer inspectors to satisfy, they'd be slightly more dangerous, if guys were dumb enough to ask anyone with any clothes on for extras. But that would let TERBians out, presumably why it wasn't part of the question.
Of course going anywhere specifically to buy sexual 'extras' would be very unsafe, unless you knew the establishment was a) reputable and b) operated discreetly and without troubling its neighbours.
Separate accounts? That's incredible. Usually, direct deposit programs only allow one account. Certain employees who want to hide money would love this (as long as nobody else sees their pay stub).This would be a mistress and I doubt you can come after someone under C-36 for that. This has been happening for the longest time. You cannot be prosecuted for supporting an artist or a friend.
Actually, some companies, including the one I work for include options to split your paycheques in multiple accounts. Pretty neat feature, I have been using to manage my play money in a separate account. Could go to support a friend in need.