Steeles Royal

What is your verdict in this case?

Erosboy

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2017
254
386
63
Ridiculous question. You don't have all the evidence, you can't test the evidence on cross examination, you have no ability to assess credibility. All you're doing is getting opinions and part of the problem these days is everyone gives judgment based on nothing. Now, asking what people's opinion is, is an entirely different and valid question
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
29,250
1,942
113
She is already in the can, this is the appellate court.
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
29,250
1,942
113
If she administered a noxious substance to a person without their knowledge or consent then she is guilty. She took the law into her own hands and she is just a guilty as any guy that puts rohypnol into a drink at a bar.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,981
5,407
113
Lewiston, NY
If she administered a noxious substance to a person without their knowledge or consent then she is guilty. She took the law into her own hands and she is just a guilty as any guy that puts rohypnol into a drink at a bar.
So you presented the situation, followed by your conclusion. Why bring it here when you already have the whole thing figured out?
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
29,250
1,942
113
So you presented the situation, followed by your conclusion. Why bring it here when you already have the whole thing figured out?
Why not bring it here, I did not do it for anyone's approval. Her former BF has presented the video on the internet to gain sympathy for this woman and make her out to be a hero when in fact it is wrong under any circumstance to administer drugs to a person without their knowledge or consent. The reason why this guy is an EX may be because she received long prison sentence so long that he had to move on rather than wait for her.
 
Toronto Escorts