A Party at Velvet lounge? They said the best day for them to accomodate us (50-100 ppl) would be monday - tuesday but would accomodate us anytime. The place holds 450 ppl until they get the padio open in April then they hold 600 ppl. Waterfalls, 2 stages, one on the top floor that if your on main level you can see the girl dancing on the top floor through a class floor they dance on. This place sounds hot!!!!
What day would you attend?
- Thread starter producing_stars
- Start date
He might be as you put it quite sexy but irregardless i don't want to see him nekkid..it was done in jest, but i am sure Ham will Thank you for the props.
Geesh, hammertm, and you accused me of trying to take the nice guy award away from Calloway!!!hammertm said:
Sorry Bootyman, but....
SYLLABICATION: ir·re·gard·less
PRONUNCIATION: r-gärdls
ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless.
ETYMOLOGY: Probably blend of irrespective and regardless.
USAGE NOTE: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
It is not really a word.....and that is all for my english teaching for the day......
irregardlessbOOTyMaN said:He might be as you put it quite sexy but irregardless i don't want to see him nekkid..it was done in jest, but i am sure Ham will Thank you for the props.
SYLLABICATION: ir·re·gard·less
PRONUNCIATION: r-gärdls
ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless.
ETYMOLOGY: Probably blend of irrespective and regardless.
USAGE NOTE: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
It is not really a word.....and that is all for my english teaching for the day......
