The One Spa

Wal-Mart Photo

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,766
0
0
Has anyone recently tried to get a nude photo of their girlfriend developed at Wal-Mart? Any success?
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,528
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Rockslinger said:
Has anyone recently tried to get a nude photo of their girlfriend developed at Wal-Mart? Any success?
Don't even try
 
May 4, 2005
1,005
0
0
I keep thinking of the movie One Hour Photo with Robin Williams.

I would think that Wal-Mart wouldn't have a problem with it. If you're into kiddie porn, and your pictures look suspicious, they might report it.

If the pics are digital, your best bet might be to do it all on-line to avoid any embarassing encounters with store clerks.
 

ISOMSOG

Ex-Escort Driver
May 8, 2004
223
0
0
Mississauga
try futureshop i have used them before and Blacks
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,528
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
Meister said:
just buy a photo printer

I AM NOT FOR SALE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rent yes
sale no
 

WhaWhaWha

Banned
Aug 17, 2001
5,987
1
0
Between a rock and a hard place
Big photo labs generally will develop tasteful nudes with no questions asked. I once asked at Japan Camera and they said "if there is only one person in the picture, we're definitely not going to have a problem with it." There are laws requiring labs to report photographers who bring in images of naked children. More than a few serious photographers have had unpleasant dealings with police stemming from what you'd have thought were easy calls (e.g., a parent who took his camera to a nudist colony and photographed his own family with their consent).

It's probably a good idea to inquire about a lab's policies before handing over your film. I once had a mooning picture removed from a roll of film I got developed at Shoppers. They left the negative, but took the racy photo and inserted a little flyer explaining that they don't develop naked pictures.

You won't be the only person who will see -- or save -- those pictures. I know people who work in photo labs, and every lab keeps binders in which they save copies of choice customer prints -- attractive nudes, embarrassing images, you name it. You should also know pictures of guns, explosives, and drug paraphernalia are routinely copied and forwarded to the RCMP or FBI along with the customer's name, phone number, and credit card number.

Like Robin Williams Character in One Hour Photo, it's simply a matter of hitting the print button twice and grabbing the duplicate from the output feed.

One option that you might try is taking them to a one-hour place and asking them to develop the roll only, and not make prints. If you hang around while they work, they may not attempt to make their own keepsakes. Try a place with an exposed machine and go in at an odd time, like right when they open. Tell them you are an art student, and you need the film developed quick so you can make some prints at the school lab. After you've got the negs done, you could just scan them.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,766
0
0
I spoke to Wal-Mart a little more than 3 years ago and was advised that their policy is not to print any "obscene" photos. I asked them if they consider the following pictures "obscene":

1) Mother breastfeeding her child.

2) Woman giving birth to baby.

3) Bare breasted adult girlfriend.

3) Two year old daughter taking a bath. (THIS IS BAD! WAL-MART WILL CALL POLICE TO ARREST YOU FOR CHILD ABUSE AND CHILD PORN!)

I did not see the movie One Hour Photo. Is it legal for a lab to print and keep a duplicate photo?
 

Capital Amatuer

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2004
1,166
672
113
Why are there two # 3's ?

Rockslinger said:
3) Two year old daughter taking a bath. (THIS IS BAD! WAL-MART WILL CALL POLICE TO ARREST YOU FOR CHILD ABUSE AND CHILD PORN!)

QUOTE]

Yes, this is very bad. It happened a couple of years ago in Ottawa, harmless family photos of their children and the dad gets arrested and just short of every detail, the media sensationalizes the 'error in judgement' by the family. If I remember, they had to go to court to defend this.
How horrific for this day and age.

It seems silly and I'm not sure if I have an arguement for Wal-marts policy. Should a family be denied what most everyone would define as innocent family photos because some twisted individuals see the photos as something more ? Should Wal-mart be allowed to censor and take action for these apparent family keepsakes ? Yet I understand thier motivation and nearly agree.

CA
 

digitald

New member
Jan 15, 2004
53
0
0
Rockslinger said:
Has anyone recently tried to get a nude photo of their girlfriend developed at Wal-Mart? Any success?
I wouldn't touch Wal-Mart photo finishing with a ten foot pole.

Here in Barrie the police got called when a woman brought in a disposable camera that happened to have photos on it from her husbands trip to the gun club. She was confronted by the police and photo finisher *in public* about the photos and was asked to see her Firearms PAL (Possession and Acquisition Licence). Even the cop didn't seem to understand that she didn't need a PAL to have *pictures* of firearms. She was "let go", but was admonished to have her PAL with her next time. I sincerely doubt they will ever see her again.

For any pictures that could remotely raise some puritanical a**hole's eyebrows, I print at home.

Stay safe,

Diggy
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Considering Wal-Mart just got their butt busted with a multi-million dollar judgement against them in California, I don't think I'd be testing them right now.
 

nomos

Active member
Feb 18, 2004
464
75
28
Wal-Mart people are a bunch of tight asses. I worked at Japan Camera for about 10 years as a printer during my high school and university years and the policy was that we were not supposed to print any picture depicting child pornography or sexual contact between two people. During my time there, we must have received and printed hundreds of film rolls from people of all walks of life that contained nudity and they all left happily with their pictures. If you are still using a regular 35mm camera to take pictures, go to a regular photo lab (not Wal-Mart) and tell them that you have a roll that contains nudity. The key is, be natural. If you don't act and approach the guy at the counter as if you are a pervert, he should be fine with it. Too bad there are still too many people in society who view nudity as innappropriate. Remind him to give you all the copies printed, including tests. ;)
 

WhaWhaWha

Banned
Aug 17, 2001
5,987
1
0
Between a rock and a hard place
Photo labs in small stores will likely give you more flexibility... Of course the service you receive is always subject to the tastes and sensibilities of the individual serving you. But two year olds in the bath? Thats pushing it. especially if thekid is not being posed or mistreated. I have a few shots of my kids wearing shampoo pompadours. Cant believe they crack down on that now.
 

Meister

Well-known member
Apr 17, 2003
4,411
745
113
It's a silly policy. Plus, I don't think a pedophile would have Walmart develop his pictures from his new conquests. You can bet your bottom dollar that he is using a photo printer.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,066
4,027
113
I had "spread eagle" shots of my ex developed at Costco.

No problem.

Too bad when we split, she was smart enough to hunt the photos and negatives down.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts