Vancouver Votes to Fund Lawsuit Against Big Oil

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,890
2,234
113
Ghawar
July 20, 2022
Mitchell Beer

Vancouver City Council voted 6-5 late Wednesday afternoon to help fund a class action lawsuit to hold the world’s biggest fossil companies responsible for their local climate impacts, in what West Coast Environmental Law (WCEL) is hailing as a “historic win”.

The council motion allocates $1 per resident to help get the lawsuit off the ground. The 2021 Canadian census put Vancouver’s population at 662,248.

“We still didn’t really believe it until it actually passed,” WCEL Staff Lawyer Andrew Gage said in the moments after the decision. “I nearly fell off my chair when I realized that we were going to win this vote,” he later tweeted.

“This is a really exciting step for the Sue Big Oil campaign,” he added. “Other cities are now going to have to explain whether they’ll step up and protect their taxpayers from the costs of climate change by following Vancouver’s lead, or whether they’re going to let Big Oil off the hook.”

Councillor Christine Boyle, one of the majority who backed the motion, said she hoped other British Columbia municipalities would do the same.

“Of course we’re stronger if more voices join together, and local governments all over B.C. and beyond are already seeing the very high costs and impacts of climate change on our local infrastructure and our residents,” she told The Energy Mix Wednesday evening.

“The reality is that we don’t have the fiscal tools currently to respond to those costs,” Boyle added. “In Vancouver, we approved a four-year capital plan just a few weeks ago, and it was an incredibly challenging plan because of climate-related infrastructure damage that we’ve seen just in the last year. We weren’t planning to prioritize [those items] in the next four years, but now we know we need to. Those costs are only going to grow. So we need to be thinking creatively about how we cover them, and big oil companies should absolutely be paying their fair share for the damage their products have caused, and that they’ve profited off of for so long.”

She said Vancouver’s C$3.49-billion capital plan for 2023-26 includes $335 million for climate mitigation investments and another $200 million to adapt to climate impacts, with both totals including $75 million for projects that cross over between the two categories.

Boyle cast the fiscal realities behind yesterday’s motion as one part of the argument for faster action on the climate emergency.

“I talk about the importance of climate from a moral perspective and from a justice and equity perspective all the time,” she said. “We had 100 people die in Vancouver in the heat dome last year, and those lives should weigh heavily on us as locally elected leaders and should influence our support for these kinds of decisions.”

But “even if climate change doesn’t keep you up at night like it does for me, every locally elected leader and every local government is struggling under the increasing costs of maintaining basic infrastructure, as well as addressing the increasing number of expectations and responsibilities that fall on our plate,” she added. So “I do think it’s a strategically important approach that we reach people from all of these different angles, so that we have more people at the table.”

In a release Wednesday, the Sue Big Oil campaign cited colossal fossils Shell, Chevron, and ExxonMobil as examples of the global climate polluters that might be named in a class action suit. It said the Insurance Bureau of Canada is advising local governments to spend a combined $5.3 billion per year, including $1 billion in Vancouver, to prepare for climate impacts.

“After the extreme heat, wildfires, and catastrophic flooding that occurred in 2021, Vancouver and other municipalities around the province are increasingly recognizing what climate change could end up costing them—both in damages and adaptation,” the release stated.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: ottawa_cuck

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
320
63
How did they get to the meeting? Bicycle?
How are they communicating? Pigeons?
Do their clothes not have petroleum products?
They should sue themselves.
And China.
And India.
And Earth’s natural warming cycle
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
How did they get to the meeting? Bicycle?
How are they communicating? Pigeons?
Do their clothes not have petroleum products?
They should sue themselves.
And China.
And India.
And Earth’s natural warming cycle
How about filling the pot holes? Maybe make life more affordable or even(gasp!) finally solve the junkie problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,961
23,573
113
How did they get to the meeting? Bicycle?
How are they communicating? Pigeons?
Do their clothes not have petroleum products?
They should sue themselves.
And China.
And India.
And Earth’s natural warming cycle
Sue the shit out of them, end the subsidies and then subsidize more EV's and renewable generation.
Then use fossil fuels and plastics sparingly.

Enjoying your microplastics in your coffee, food and blood?
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,061
2,556
113
Vancouver has the most self-destructive approach to public policy of any city in Canada. It's becoming unliveably expensive out there (California North). Chasing the oil business out of town will just make things worse for local citizens.

If a seaway could be built from Alberta to the Pacific, Vancouver would be Canada's Buffalo NY.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,944
3,543
113
protect their taxpayers from the costs of climate change by following Vancouver’s lead,
taxpayers do not need protection from climate change
they need protection from irresponsible politicians

suing big oil is ridiculous
we have an energy shortage & we will require lots of oil going forward
Big oil should just turn off the taps for 2 or 3 days
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
40,416
7,704
113
Vancouver was never going to be sustainable unless it protected the industries that made it rich: forestry and seafood.

Japan was once addicted to BC Seafood in much the same way that China is addicted to Ontario Pork (my revenue stream has dwindled somewhat: see Big Top Xi). Unfortunately pollution and shipping has taken a toll especially in the Strait of Georgia. The forestry industry has been hit hard by climate change. Forest fires are ravaging some of the industry's most productive lands. The Transmountain Pipeline through an earthquake fault line will only make thing worse.

There was a time when you could feed dolphins herring from Ballentyne Pier, those days are long gone.

 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,061
2,556
113
Vancouver was never going to be sustainable unless it protected the industries that made it rich: forestry and seafood.

Japan was once addicted to BC Seafood in much the same way that China is addicted to Ontario Pork (my revenue stream has dwindled somewhat: see Big Top Xi). Unfortunately pollution and shipping has taken a toll especially in the Strait of Georgia. The forestry industry has been hit hard by climate change. Forest fires are ravaging some of the industry's most productive lands. The Transmountain Pipeline through an earthquake fault line will only make thing worse.

There was a time when you could feed dolphins herring from Ballentyne Pier, those days are long gone.

You're leaving out its importance as a port to and from the Pacific. Vancouver is Canada's largest and busiest port. However, if you stop shipping oil to Japan and China, and lumber, and seafood - you are inviting the demise of the Vancouver economy. Buffalo is the best American example of what happens to a port city when it is no longer a port.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecolt

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,650
1,312
113
That money would be better spent on research coming up with a viable, economic, and scalable alternative to big oil.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,020
11,259
113
Instead of suing big oil, Vancouver should pass a by-law banning gas stations and the sale of any oil products.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,944
3,543
113
Instead of suing big oil, Vancouver should pass a by-law banning gas stations and the sale of any oil products.

Oh just to be clear, the city politicians do not wish to end the use of gasoline or diesel
They want to virtue signal, promote themselves as controllers of our climate to get re-elected and spend the theoretical proceeds from the lawsuit
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,890
2,234
113
Ghawar
Canada has one of the world's biggest climate hypocrite
in Vancouver. Their city council may as well file a lawsuit
against itself for dumping dirty coal into the world.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,961
23,573
113
Canada has one of the world's biggest climate hypocrite
in Vancouver. Their city council may as well file a lawsuit
against itself for dumping dirty coal into the world.
Its tiring reading posts by the oil industry attacking others for trying to fix the problems they caused.
 
Toronto Escorts