Here's a link to a story about one Catherine Bosely who was on vacation apparently and entered an amateur wet T shirt contest while there. Well, she won apparently. I guess it was some sort of vacation resort thing. At the time, Catherine was a news anchor on some local channel in Youngstown Ohio (wherever in hell that is).
Well, I guess in the age of the internet, it can be a very small world and word / pictures got back to her employer who promptly fired her. Apparently, she had signed a "morality clause" in her contract.
Now, my personal opinion is that she should not have been fired regardless of any stupid morality clause. What she was doing was her own business, on her own time, while on vacation.
I also find it strange that someone has to sign a morality clause.
I would like to think that a "morality clause" is an uptight american thing, that Canadian companies wouldn't force their employees to sign such a thing. (I don't know of anyone I know ever mentioning having to sign a morality clause)
I bet that if she had posed on the cover of some gun magazine with an AK-47 she would be perfecty OK, but showing her human body is punishable by being fired.
I read this story on an American bulletin board and was amazed at how many Americans thought that she should have been fired. The vast majority of posters thought that she either deserved it, or at the least, because she signed this morality clause, too bad, she deserved to be fired. Even if it was on her own time, while on vacation.
Here's the link to the pics by the way.
http://www.slatner.com/catherinebosley/
And if you really want to shake your head, read what the new director at her TV station had to say about the entire issue....
http://www.wkbn.com/Global/story.asp?S=1600221
Personally, I think she should apply to City TV. No problem from my point of view.
Well, I guess in the age of the internet, it can be a very small world and word / pictures got back to her employer who promptly fired her. Apparently, she had signed a "morality clause" in her contract.
Now, my personal opinion is that she should not have been fired regardless of any stupid morality clause. What she was doing was her own business, on her own time, while on vacation.
I also find it strange that someone has to sign a morality clause.
I would like to think that a "morality clause" is an uptight american thing, that Canadian companies wouldn't force their employees to sign such a thing. (I don't know of anyone I know ever mentioning having to sign a morality clause)
I bet that if she had posed on the cover of some gun magazine with an AK-47 she would be perfecty OK, but showing her human body is punishable by being fired.
I read this story on an American bulletin board and was amazed at how many Americans thought that she should have been fired. The vast majority of posters thought that she either deserved it, or at the least, because she signed this morality clause, too bad, she deserved to be fired. Even if it was on her own time, while on vacation.
Here's the link to the pics by the way.
http://www.slatner.com/catherinebosley/
And if you really want to shake your head, read what the new director at her TV station had to say about the entire issue....
http://www.wkbn.com/Global/story.asp?S=1600221
Personally, I think she should apply to City TV. No problem from my point of view.