US military aid to Ukraine guarantees more suffering and death

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,927
2,244
113
Ghawar
Stephen Kinzer
Mar 17, 2022

Ukraine has suffered two terrible afflictions in recent weeks. First came the horrific Russian invasion, which has set off bloody conflict and outraged much of the world. Second is the American decision to send that suffering country massive amounts of advanced weaponry, which guarantees more suffering and death.

Never has the United States rushed so quickly to provide so much high-tech armament to a distant country already enveloped in war. Rather than sending diplomats in an urgent effort to reach an armistice and stop the bloodshed, the United States is fueling an already raging conflagration.

This week President Biden announced that he would send Ukraine a staggering $800 million worth of “our most cutting-edge systems.” His largesse includes 800 Stinger missiles, which are hand-held projectiles that can bring down a military jet or a civilian airliner, and 9,000 “anti-armor” systems, which can blow up tanks or trucks. They will not only be used to kill Russians, but also provoke Russia to respond by killing more Ukrainians. Given the number of mercenaries that both sides are recruiting from around the world, some of these weapons will almost certainly leak onto the global black market. Look for them to turn up in the arsenals of terrorists around the world.

Those of us who have seen war up close know that it is the worst thing in the world. It destroys innocent lives and shatters families and communities forever, long after political and military conflicts end. Yet for nearly everyone in Washington and for huge numbers of Americans, war is distant and antiseptic, something like a geopolitical video game with added fireworks. It isn’t. It’s about bodies blown apart and entire nations laid waste. The only winners are gleeful arms makers, for whom this war is a bonanza of bloodstained profit.

Our obsession with Ukraine is unlike anything in living memory. People who had never heard of that country a month ago, and who even today could not find it on a map, have almost overnight come to believe that the future of human freedom is being decided there. They boycott Russian vodka and display the colors of the Ukrainian flag, which most had never seen before. This tsunami of delirium will be rich fodder for future psychologists studying mass hypnosis, group frenzies, and the power of the media to whip populations into self-destructive fury. Less laughable is the Niagara of armament that is flooding into Ukraine. If Russian President Vladimir Putin needed any more evidence for his conviction that the West wants to use Ukraine as a battering ram against Russia, we are providing it.

Nearly everyone in Washington has succumbed to our new national hysteria. One exception is Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who warned that escalating this war “does not help Ukraine, does not help the people of the United States, and does not make the world any safer.” An even more trenchant dissent came from the other end of the political spectrum. “What is the one thing that brings Republicans and Democrats together?” Senator Rand Paul asked. “War! They love it. The more the better.”

It’s bad enough that the United States and NATO have joined Putin in a mad escalation, recklessly fueling war and making no serious effort to reach peace. Even worse is that the peace formula is clear for all to see. It’s mind-numbingly simple: a non-aligned Ukraine without foreign troops or weapons. Call it the Henry Kissinger Plan, since 10 years ago he wrote that “if Ukraine is to survive and thrive, it must not be either side’s outpost against the other — it should function as a bridge between them.” By today’s standards, that makes Kissinger a “Kremlin stooge” who is “parroting Putin’s talking points.”

Our escalation in Ukraine will fuel counter-escalation. That intensifies a confrontation between two nuclear-armed powers. Every Russian weapon sent to Ukraine means horror. So does every American weapon. Our testosterone-fueled war fever invites disaster for Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and the world. A peaceful solution is within easy reach. We should grab it.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,927
2,244
113
Ghawar
Military aid even if free is good for the business of weapons
exports. It won't be long before Taiwan showing interest in
buying the "most cutting-edge systems.” from the U.S. for
defence against the PRC.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,874
6,837
113
war fuels the US economy...its how they showcase the weaponry they're selling to the world...
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
78,318
96,022
113
And when FDR gave lend-lease aid to Britain, it cost more loss, grief and death to innocent Nazi German lives and allowed Britain to fight on. What a motherfucker that FDR was!
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,019
11,260
113

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,073
23,619
113
Stephen Kinzer
Mar 17, 2022

Ukraine has suffered two terrible afflictions in recent weeks. First came the horrific Russian invasion, which has set off bloody conflict and outraged much of the world. Second is the American decision to send that suffering country massive amounts of advanced weaponry, which guarantees more suffering and death.

Never has the United States rushed so quickly to provide so much high-tech armament to a distant country already enveloped in war. Rather than sending diplomats in an urgent effort to reach an armistice and stop the bloodshed, the United States is fueling an already raging conflagration.

This week President Biden announced that he would send Ukraine a staggering $800 million worth of “our most cutting-edge systems.” His largesse includes 800 Stinger missiles, which are hand-held projectiles that can bring down a military jet or a civilian airliner, and 9,000 “anti-armor” systems, which can blow up tanks or trucks. They will not only be used to kill Russians, but also provoke Russia to respond by killing more Ukrainians. Given the number of mercenaries that both sides are recruiting from around the world, some of these weapons will almost certainly leak onto the global black market. Look for them to turn up in the arsenals of terrorists around the world.

Those of us who have seen war up close know that it is the worst thing in the world. It destroys innocent lives and shatters families and communities forever, long after political and military conflicts end. Yet for nearly everyone in Washington and for huge numbers of Americans, war is distant and antiseptic, something like a geopolitical video game with added fireworks. It isn’t. It’s about bodies blown apart and entire nations laid waste. The only winners are gleeful arms makers, for whom this war is a bonanza of bloodstained profit.

Our obsession with Ukraine is unlike anything in living memory. People who had never heard of that country a month ago, and who even today could not find it on a map, have almost overnight come to believe that the future of human freedom is being decided there. They boycott Russian vodka and display the colors of the Ukrainian flag, which most had never seen before. This tsunami of delirium will be rich fodder for future psychologists studying mass hypnosis, group frenzies, and the power of the media to whip populations into self-destructive fury. Less laughable is the Niagara of armament that is flooding into Ukraine. If Russian President Vladimir Putin needed any more evidence for his conviction that the West wants to use Ukraine as a battering ram against Russia, we are providing it.

Nearly everyone in Washington has succumbed to our new national hysteria. One exception is Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who warned that escalating this war “does not help Ukraine, does not help the people of the United States, and does not make the world any safer.” An even more trenchant dissent came from the other end of the political spectrum. “What is the one thing that brings Republicans and Democrats together?” Senator Rand Paul asked. “War! They love it. The more the better.”

It’s bad enough that the United States and NATO have joined Putin in a mad escalation, recklessly fueling war and making no serious effort to reach peace. Even worse is that the peace formula is clear for all to see. It’s mind-numbingly simple: a non-aligned Ukraine without foreign troops or weapons. Call it the Henry Kissinger Plan, since 10 years ago he wrote that “if Ukraine is to survive and thrive, it must not be either side’s outpost against the other — it should function as a bridge between them.” By today’s standards, that makes Kissinger a “Kremlin stooge” who is “parroting Putin’s talking points.”

Our escalation in Ukraine will fuel counter-escalation. That intensifies a confrontation between two nuclear-armed powers. Every Russian weapon sent to Ukraine means horror. So does every American weapon. Our testosterone-fueled war fever invites disaster for Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and the world. A peaceful solution is within easy reach. We should grab it.

The amount of death and destruction from this one war looks like nothing compared to the damages from climate change caused by the oil & gas industry.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
78,318
96,022
113

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,019
11,260
113
Meanwhile, there are people who think Lincoln is a huge hero for starting a war that killed over 700,000 Americans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,789
6,829
113
In WWII it is estimated that Russia killed at least 5mm German civilians. Maybe Russia should have surrendered on day one of Operation Barbarossa? Would have saved a lot of German lives (maybe?).
GERMAN CIVILIAN DEATH TOLL IN WORLD WAR II (worldfuturefund.org)
But that would have stopped Germany from having the chance to kill 20,000000 Russians. Ya don't get opportunities like that for free!

And pointing out that Germany started it is probably now called "whataboutism".
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,019
11,260
113
But that would have stopped Germany from having the chance to kill 20,000000 Russians. Ya don't get opportunities like that for free!
No guarantee that surrender would have saved any Russian lives. In fact, maybe more would have died. Genocide on a massive scale?
 

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,789
6,829
113
And when FDR gave lend-lease aid to Britain, it cost more loss, grief and death to innocent Nazi German lives and allowed Britain to fight on. What a motherfucker that FDR was!
In much the same was as everybody sitting by and watching as Russia has been trying to swallow Ukraine since 2014, the League of Nations watched Germany rearm and build their military between the wars. Anyway, I remember watching Gore Vidal talking about the war. He served in the navy. He said he never once heard anyone in the service talking about patriotism. They were all agreed that someone was making a shit load of money off the war. as usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,789
6,829
113
No guarantee that surrender would have saved any Russian lives. In fact, maybe more would have died. Genocide on a massive scale?
That was kind of my point. Why spend money on bullets when you can have 20,000000 slaves who you work to death and then put in very cost effective gas chambers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,019
11,260
113

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,019
11,260
113
In WW II the U.S. also provided military aid to Great Britain and Russia (maybe Russia was a big mistake?).
dog (2).JPG
 

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,789
6,829
113
The Dupont Company made the awesome profit of one dollar in WW II.

"du Pont’s Terms: The company refused any profit and agreed to this contract on the condition that du Pont would only be reimbursed for its expenses plus one dollar.
History Lessons from DuPont for the Successful Development of Future Public-Private Partnerships in Fusion Enterprises (iaea.org)
Good for them. However most of them cashed in. Here's 3.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,927
2,244
113
Ghawar
And when FDR gave lend-lease aid to Britain, it cost more loss, grief and death to innocent Nazi German lives and allowed Britain to fight on. What a motherfucker that FDR was!
I would be sending aid to whichever country fighting
against a common enemy in a total war to save lives
of my own soldiers. Sacrifice of material is easier than
sacrifice of blood.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts