US Army investigating 82nd Airborne men on gay porn website

[Fred Zed]

Authorities at Fort Bragg, N.C., have begun an inquiry into whether the paratroopers' actions violated the military conduct codehttp://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/060127/w012760.html

 

[baltimoron]

I think that the troops, gay or not, probably did it for the money.

I have no problems with gays in the military. We need all the volunteers we can get.

My beef is with women in combat, which I am against.

 

[zanner69]

I think that the troops, gay or not, probably did it for the money.

I have no problems with gays in the military. We need all the volunteers we can get.

My beef is with women in combat, which I am against.

why are you against women in combat? please explain your position. is it because they are not qualified or because in combat there is a fear that if they are caught by the enemy - the chances of them getting abused is greater (i.e. sexually assaulted)

 

[baltimoron]

I have nothing but respect for women in the military, and I have no doubt that they can perform just as valiantly as men in combat.

But yes, I am just not ready to see women captured as POWs. The feminists' stories about male POWs being raped are exaggerated and inflated, IMHO. The Vietnamese and Japanese were vehemently opposed to homosexuality; so besides a few homosexual Nazis, I don't see how male POWs could have been raped. The idea of Suzy Cupcakes, ex-prom queen, being forced into a gangbang with RIFTs, is not something I want to think about.

 

[maxweber]

have a gander at this goose

So: it's okay, or even preferable, if male POWs are tortured? And RIFTs (or other captors) would torture women, but not men?

MW

 

[langeweile]

Don't ask and don't tell.

 

[zanner69]

Don't ask and don't tell.

does it work??

http://www.hrea.org/lists/hr-headlines/markup/msg00835.html

The policy has cost the military an estimated $218 million to recruit and
train replacements for servicemembers discharged because they acknowledged
their sexual orientation