Hot Pink List

update - Trump bombs Caracas, claims to have kidnapped Maduro

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,878
20,602
113
LoL...we're in Canada...Trump can't do shit here...We got Mark to deal with him....or are you saying Mark is incompetent?

I see, you’re running off on a tangent now. Okay, let's play.

The reality is that Trump isn’t threatening everyone the same way. Greenland, Mexico, and Colombia get loose talk about military pressure. Canada, so far, gets an economic war and the only reason that’s been partially blunted is because of CUSMA.

That said, how do you think this looks today if you’re working in the steel or aluminum sector, Ritchie? Tariffs, uncertainty, and jobs on the line. Does that really qualify as Trump “not doing shit,” or does it just not affect you directly?
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,894
9,433
113
Stephen Miller is so macho he braids his chest hair.

He says Greenland belongs to the USA. He's right, taking it over would be a piece of cake, occupying it would be a nightmare.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,219
9,965
113
I see, you’re running off on a tangent now. Okay, let's play.

The reality is that Trump isn’t threatening everyone the same way. Greenland, Mexico, and Colombia get loose talk about military pressure. Canada, so far, gets an economic war and the only reason that’s been partially blunted is because of CUSMA.

That said, how do you think this looks today if you’re working in the steel or aluminum sector, Ritchie? Tariffs, uncertainty, and jobs on the line. Does that really qualify as Trump “not doing shit,” or does it just not affect you directly?
Oh please...I work for a company that does a lot of business in the US and buy a lot of raw materials in the US...the tariffs are exagerrated... Trump is a troll and will always troll Media...he will give them something to talk about and they bite every time...it's TDS...once you got it...you can't help yourself...it removes your common sense...case in point...he basically have liberals defend Maduro, the guy 5 years ago democrats wanted to remove from office...lmao.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,219
9,965
113
Stephen Miller is so macho he braids his chest hair.

He says Greenland belongs to the USA. He's right, taking it over would be a piece of cake, occupying it would be a nightmare.

You gotta ask yourself though, geographically...it should belong to Canada...not Denmark nor the US...lol.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,894
9,433
113
You gotta ask yourself though, geographically...it should belong to Canada...not Denmark nor the US...lol.
Canada as enough problems with the Arctic patch it already has. Denmark was negotiating an independence treaty with Greenland to keep it within NATO. If The King of Kings occupies Greenland, NATO is dead. Putin will be thrilled.

I pity the suckers Trump sends to occupy Greenland.

 
Last edited:

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,219
9,965
113
Canada as enough problems with the Arctic patch it already has. Denmark was negotiating an independence treaty with Greenland to keep it within NATO. If The King of Kings occupies Greenland, NATO is dead. Putin will be thrilled.

I pity the suckers Trump sends to occupy Greenland.


Richy do you love polar bears, they're almost as cute as Mike Lindell.

I've seen them once on my trip north of Cochrane...they are majestic but to be feared more than Grizzlies...my only wild encounter with a bear was black bear on the side of the road on my trip to Thunder Bay...it was massive but my friend said, they're smaller than Grizzlies...lol...I do a lot of fly fishing north pickering and news was there are Bear sightings in that area like 2020...wouldn't want to encounter that for sure.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,878
20,602
113
Oh please...I work for a company that does a lot of business in the US and buy a lot of raw materials in the US...the tariffs are exagerrated... Trump is a troll and will always troll Media...he will give them something to talk about and they bite every time...it's TDS...once you got it...you can't help yourself...it removes your common sense...case in point...he basically have liberals defend Maduro, the guy 5 years ago democrats wanted to remove from office...lmao.
Again, trouble reading, I see. I specifically said steel and aluminum. CUSMA protects us for now against the other tariffs, as SuperMark has pointed out many times. You really need to get your head out of your ass so you can see reality as opposed to an alternate universe.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,649
135,440
113
The White House said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, making clear that using the US military is not off the table.

“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a Tuesday statement to CNN.

“The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal.”

The statement comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers this week that the Trump administration is considering buying Greenland as he downplayed concerns about US military intervention in the short term, according to a source familiar with the discussion.


The administration’s aspirations related to the resource-rich, self-governing territory of Denmark had not been publicly mentioned in recent months, but officials were still discussing the matter behind the scenes.

At the request of Rubio’s team, the State Department in recent months provided an analysis of the untapped resources in Greenland, including rare earths, according to a source familiar with the analysis. One conclusion was that there is no reliable study of how vast those resources may be. The assessment also said there would be tremendous cost in accessing the resources given the cold temperatures and lack of infrastructure, the source said.

Trump has been leaning into a more expansionist foreign policy — including a renewed interest in acquiring the Danish territory — in the days since the US capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

“We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday.


Senior White House aide Stephen Miller doubled down on the position Monday, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that nobody would fight the US militarily “over the future of Greenland” and questioning the right of Denmark — a fellow NATO nation — to claim the territory.

The Trump administration’s renewed interest spurred a statement of support for Denmark from European leaders, who said Tuesday the Arctic island belongs to its people. The leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark said security in the Arctic must be achieved collectively with NATO allies, including the United States.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Monday that Trump’s desires should be “taken seriously,” warning that a US military attack on Greenland could effectively end NATO.


Greenland said Tuesday it has asked for a meeting with Rubio following the Trump administration’s recent statements.


Trump has long eyed Greenland, a resource-rich island of 836,000 square miles strategically located between the US, Europe and Russia. Its rich deposits of natural resources, including oil, gas and rare earth minerals, make it even more strategically important.

Shortly after winning the 2024 election, Trump revived his first-term offer to purchase Greenland, which was again rebuffed. Nearly exactly a year ago, he held a wide-ranging news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in which he did not rule out military action to take control of Greenland.

During a speech to a joint session of Congress early last year, Trump lobbed a threat at Greenland: “I think we’re going to get it. One way or the other, we’re going to get it.”

The administration’s Greenland focus has brought criticism from Democrats and some Republicans.


Sen. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat, said he is introducing a resolution to prevent the US from invading Greenland. “Trump is telling us exactly what he wants to do. We must stop him before he invades another country on a whim,” Gallego said in a post on X.

Republican Rep. Don Bacon, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, has urged the administration to “stop the stupid ‘we want Greenland BS’” and called on other Republicans to “universally oppose” any military action toward Greenland.

“This is appalling. Greenland is a NATO ally. We have a base on Greenland. We could put four or five bases on Greenland; they wouldn’t mind that,” Bacon told CNN’s Tapper on “The Lead” on Tuesday.

Referring to Denmark, Bacon added, “They are a proven ally, so the way we are treating them is really demeaning, and it has no upside.”


Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, the co-chairs of the bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group, in a statement Tuesday reaffirmed the United States’ long-standing partnership with Denmark, an ally they said has “earned our unwavering respect.” They also highlighted how Denmark is “significantly increasing its defense spending and remains a critical partner in Arctic security.”

“Any suggestion that our nation would subject a fellow NATO ally to coercion or external pressure undermines the very principles of self-determination that our Alliance exists to defend,” the senators said.

This story has been updated with additional information.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,878
20,602
113
The White House said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is “discussing a range of options” to acquire Greenland, making clear that using the US military is not off the table.

“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a Tuesday statement to CNN.

“The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief’s disposal.”

The statement comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers this week that the Trump administration is considering buying Greenland as he downplayed concerns about US military intervention in the short term, according to a source familiar with the discussion.


The administration’s aspirations related to the resource-rich, self-governing territory of Denmark had not been publicly mentioned in recent months, but officials were still discussing the matter behind the scenes.

At the request of Rubio’s team, the State Department in recent months provided an analysis of the untapped resources in Greenland, including rare earths, according to a source familiar with the analysis. One conclusion was that there is no reliable study of how vast those resources may be. The assessment also said there would be tremendous cost in accessing the resources given the cold temperatures and lack of infrastructure, the source said.

Trump has been leaning into a more expansionist foreign policy — including a renewed interest in acquiring the Danish territory — in the days since the US capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

“We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday.


Senior White House aide Stephen Miller doubled down on the position Monday, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that nobody would fight the US militarily “over the future of Greenland” and questioning the right of Denmark — a fellow NATO nation — to claim the territory.

The Trump administration’s renewed interest spurred a statement of support for Denmark from European leaders, who said Tuesday the Arctic island belongs to its people. The leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark said security in the Arctic must be achieved collectively with NATO allies, including the United States.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Monday that Trump’s desires should be “taken seriously,” warning that a US military attack on Greenland could effectively end NATO.


Greenland said Tuesday it has asked for a meeting with Rubio following the Trump administration’s recent statements.


Trump has long eyed Greenland, a resource-rich island of 836,000 square miles strategically located between the US, Europe and Russia. Its rich deposits of natural resources, including oil, gas and rare earth minerals, make it even more strategically important.

Shortly after winning the 2024 election, Trump revived his first-term offer to purchase Greenland, which was again rebuffed. Nearly exactly a year ago, he held a wide-ranging news conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in which he did not rule out military action to take control of Greenland.

During a speech to a joint session of Congress early last year, Trump lobbed a threat at Greenland: “I think we’re going to get it. One way or the other, we’re going to get it.”

The administration’s Greenland focus has brought criticism from Democrats and some Republicans.


Sen. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat, said he is introducing a resolution to prevent the US from invading Greenland. “Trump is telling us exactly what he wants to do. We must stop him before he invades another country on a whim,” Gallego said in a post on X.

Republican Rep. Don Bacon, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, has urged the administration to “stop the stupid ‘we want Greenland BS’” and called on other Republicans to “universally oppose” any military action toward Greenland.

“This is appalling. Greenland is a NATO ally. We have a base on Greenland. We could put four or five bases on Greenland; they wouldn’t mind that,” Bacon told CNN’s Tapper on “The Lead” on Tuesday.

Referring to Denmark, Bacon added, “They are a proven ally, so the way we are treating them is really demeaning, and it has no upside.”


Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, the co-chairs of the bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group, in a statement Tuesday reaffirmed the United States’ long-standing partnership with Denmark, an ally they said has “earned our unwavering respect.” They also highlighted how Denmark is “significantly increasing its defense spending and remains a critical partner in Arctic security.”

“Any suggestion that our nation would subject a fellow NATO ally to coercion or external pressure undermines the very principles of self-determination that our Alliance exists to defend,” the senators said.

This story has been updated with additional information.
Is this the proper thread for me to ask @WyattEarp his opinion if Trump's action of invading Greenland is justified? :unsure:

WAIT, we can do it here too https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/trump-to-use-possible-military-force-to-acquire-greenland.913064/ :love: :love:
 
Last edited:

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,649
135,440
113
From Maduro's 'tigress' to Venezuela's interim president: Who is Delcy Rodríguez?


The swearing in of Delcy Rodríguez as Venezuela's interim president following Washington's ouster of Nicolás Maduro marks the latest twist in the country's socialist "Chavismo" movement.

But who exactly is Rodríguez, and what can be gleaned from her family background and political ties?


The 56-year-old lawyer has risen rapidly through the ranks of power in Miraflores Palace over the past decade. Yet her political ascent is inseparable from her family history —above all from the legacy of her father, José Antonio Rodríguez.


José Antonio Rodríguez, the patriarch of a family that would later come to shape the trajectory of Venezuela’s socialist journey, was an active student leader and militant within several left-wing armed movements.

He later co-founded the Socialist League, a marginal political party that rejected electoral politics and actively promoted abstention and the null vote.

In February 1976, José Antonio Rodríguez allegedly coordinated the abduction of William Niehous, a US executive who headed the Venezuelan operations of the glassmaker Owens-Illinois and whom the guerrilla movement accused of being a CIA agent.


Related video: Venezuela's interim president gives public comments on crisis in country (The Canadian Press)

6 de enero, luego de la terrible agresión militar, ayer

Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:57


The Canadian Press
Venezuela's interim president gives public comments on crisis in country
0

View on WatchView on Watch

Five months later, José Antonio Rodríguez was arrested by officers of the Directorate of Intelligence and Prevention Services (DISIP). He died in police custody after what his family alleges was torture. His youngest daughter, Delcy, was seven at the time.

Both Delcy and her brother Jorge — also a child when their father was killed — have spoken publicly about the impact of these events, describing their father's death as a defining personal and political trauma.


FILE: Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez in Caracas, Venezuela, March 15, 2023. Matias Delacroix/Copyright 2023 The AP. All rights reserved

FILE: Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez in Caracas, Venezuela, March 15, 2023. Matias Delacroix/Copyright 2023 The AP. All rights reserved
The Rodríguez siblings completed their secondary education at a public high school in Caracas affiliated with the Central University of Venezuela (UCV), an institution that served as an incubator for generations of Marxist activists, including their father.

Both later enrolled at UCV in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Delcy Rodríguez graduated in law, while Jorge Rodríguez trained as a psychiatrist. Despite their different academic paths, both would eventually enter national politics following the rise of Chavismo.


According to official government biographies, Delcy Rodríguez later pursued postgraduate studies abroad, completing degrees in labour law at Paris Nanterre University and in social policy at Birkbeck, University of London.

However, there is no publicly available documentation from either institution confirming these qualifications.

From Chávez to Maduro
The Rodríguez siblings entered public life during Hugo Chávez’s first presidential term, which began in 1999.

Delcy Rodríguez initially occupied technical and bureaucratic roles rather than overtly political ones.

From 2003 onwards, she worked in positions such as the General Coordination Office of the Vice Presidency and the Directorate of International Affairs at the Ministry of Energy and Mines.


Her career took a decisive turn a decade later, following Chávez’s death in 2013 and Maduro’s consolidation of power.

From that point on, Delcy Rodríguez moved into explicitly political roles and became one of the most influential figures within the executive.


FILE: Vice President Delcy Rodriguez speaks in Caracas, Venezuela, Friday, Aug. 23, 2024. Ariana Cubillos/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved

FILE: Vice President Delcy Rodriguez speaks in Caracas, Venezuela, Friday, Aug. 23, 2024. Ariana Cubillos/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved
She served as Minister of Communication and Information between 2013 and 2014, then as Minister of Foreign Affairs from 2014 to 2017, before becoming president of the National Constituent Assembly in 2017.

That final role proved particularly consequential. Under her leadership, the Assembly granted itself sweeping, plenipotentiary powers over the other branches of government, ostensibly to draft a new constitution — a process that was never completed.


In 2018, the presidency of the Constituent Assembly passed to Diosdado Cabello, Venezuela’s interior minister and the other central figure — alongside Rodríguez — in the country’s current de facto executive structure.

Maduro once praised her international role, saying she defended Venezuela’s sovereignty and his socialist government "like a tigress". Announcing her as vice president in 2018, he described her as "brave … revolutionary and tested in a thousand battles".
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,649
135,440
113
White House blatantly rewrites Jan 6 history on official site


The White House used the fifth anniversary of the Capitol riots on Jan. 6, 2021, to publish an alternate history of the events, which insisted that President Donald Trump did not attempt to overthrow the 2020 presidential election by inciting violence.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung promised "all the facts" as he announced the new White House website on Tuesday. But instead, the site presented a distorted view of history.


"The Democrats masterfully reversed reality after January 6, branding peaceful patriotic protesters as 'insurrectionists' and framing the event as a violent coup attempt orchestrated by Trump—despite no evidence of armed rebellion or intent to overthrow the government," the website claimed. "In truth, it was the Democrats who staged the real insurrection by certifying a fraud-ridden election."

The website also paints former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as personally responsible for allowing a riot to break out at the Capitol. A rioter who was killed while trying to breach the House chamber was "murdered in cold blood," the site claimed.


"Zero law enforcement officers lost their lives," it said, downplaying the violence against Capitol Police officers.



"Vice President Mike Pence, who had the opportunity to return disputed electoral slates to state legislatures for review and decertification under the United States Constitution, chooses not to exercise that power in an act of cowardice and sabotage," Trump's White House complained. "Instead, Pence presides over the certification of contested electors, undermining President Trump's efforts to address documented fraud and ending any chance to correct the election steal."

The history ended with Trump's "triumph over tyranny."

"Despite relentless Deep State efforts to imprison, bankrupt, and assassinate him—all designed to sabotage his political comeback through fabricated indictments, invasive raids, and rigged show trials—President Trump emerges triumphant," the fairytale conclusion said. "Fueled by unbreakable resolve, the fierce loyalty of his courageous family, team, and Patriotic Americans, and God's unmistakable grace, he delivers a landslide 2024 victory and reclaims the White House in the greatest comeback in American History."
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,649
135,440
113
Unlawfully appointed Trump prosecutor gets one-week ultimatum from judge


A federal judge has ordered Trump loyalist Lindsey Halligan to explain herself — and fast.

Judge David J. Novak in Richmond, Virginia, gave the controversial prosecutor just a week to justify why she continues signing official court documents as the U.S. attorney for Eastern Virginia, despite being ruled unlawfully appointed, The New York Times reported Tuesday.


The order comes after another judge, Cameron McGowan Currie, determined the Justice Department violated the Constitution when it installed Halligan in the post. Novak's order marks the "most robust" pushback yet against Halligan's refusal to step aside.

Novak warned that Halligan's repeated signing of court papers could constitute "false or misleading statements," hinting at potential disciplinary action.


Currie previously found that Trump's back-to-back temporary appointments were unlawful and tossed two high-profile cases Halligan filed against Trump enemies: ex-FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The original prosecutor, Erik Siebert, was fired after refusing to prosecute Comey and James. Trump then tapped Halligan temporarily, a move legal experts have said violates federal law.

Novak, himself a Trump appointee, made it clear he believed Currie's ruling was "binding" despite the Justice Department's appeal.

“Consequently,” he wrote, “it remains the binding precedent in this district and is not subject to being ignored.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,649
135,440
113
1767788122052.png


Trump’s Pledging Big Investment in Venezuelan Oil. The U.S. Oil Industry Has Been Silent.
Industry experts called plans to get oil companies to spend billions and potentially provide subsidies “preposterous” and “kind of absurd.”


Alex Brandon/AP

By Anna Kramer



The United States’ oil industry appears wary of President Donald Trump’s repeated pledges that companies are going to spend billions of dollars upgrading decrepit Venezuelan oil infrastructure following the capture of Nicolás Maduro.

The companies themselves have stayed largely silent since Saturday, when Trump promised that the American oil industry would “go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country.”

None has provided on-the-record statements about their plans beyond Chevron, which said it was focused on protecting its assets in the country. And the American Petroleum Institute, the leading industry association for American oil and gas companies, has not met with the Trump administration about this issue.

Rather, oil analysts have made clear that American and multinational oil giants don’t have an economic incentive to pony up investments in Venezuela, despite it being home to the largest oil reserves in the world.

Unless the Trump administration can address the serious safety issues, fear of regime instability, and longstanding legal concerns, the president’s pledge to “take the oil” remains a giant question mark.
“I really don’t know, who are the players that win from this?” said Ed Hirs, an energy markets analyst and professor at the University of Houston. “It’s not obvious, that’s for sure.”

One Democratic House staffer who works on oil and gas issues described the entire conversation about Venezuelan oil as “kind of absurd.”

The global price of oil has dropped so low that companies have been laying off staff and slowing production, creating an environment that would make it difficult to justify billions of dollars in new production in a country with a notoriously unstable business environment.

Oil companies are reporting declines in activity and continued pessimism about future outlooks, according to the two most recent quarterly energy surveys from the Dallas Federal Reserve.
“Decreasing oil prices are making many of our firm’s wells noneconomic,” one firm wrote in the most recent survey.

In that context, asking companies to invest billions to increase production in a different country and eventually drive global prices down further makes little sense, the House staffer said.

“The price, the economics of it, do not work out right now. Again, if they’re going to make any sort of significant investments, it’ll be years and years away,” this staffer said.

Trump suggested that the United States would subsidize investment in Venezuelan energy infrastructure during a Monday interview with NBC News.

A senior White House official said that outreach to oil companies has already begun and will continue, led by Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

On the record, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said that oil companies are “ready and willing to make big investments in Venezuela” and that “American oil companies will do an incredible job for the people of Venezuela and will represent the United States well.”

The only American oil company currently operating in Venezuela is Chevron, and it is the company best positioned to make some early investments that could boost production. Though Chevron has permission to operate in the country, it has not been allowed to invest, and changes on those restrictions could lead to upgrades that would increase oil output by a few hundred thousand barrels (a relatively small amount), Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analysis at data analytics firm Kpler said during an industry analysts’ briefing Tuesday.

Oil refineries on the Gulf Coast, which are designed to process the heavy crude specific to Venezuela, and not the light crude produced in the U.S. Permian Basin, would also benefit from an increased flow of Venezuelan crude oil.

But an industry source told NOTUS that those refineries view Venezuelan crude as a nice-to-have, not something they need or have been hoping for.

Ultimately, oil companies need stability, safety and a good legal framework to operate — and they also will need a clear financial incentive, according to a Tuesday report from Wood Mackenzie, a leading energy research and consulting firm.

The investment options in Venezuela offer none of those things — especially given the country’s history of nationalizing refineries, and the lack of clarity about the country’s leadership going forward.

“Venezuela is a long term play. Post-2030 the Permian may have peaked, other big sources may have depleted, so a giant resource is valuable. But it also means that none of this big, new production is happening anytime soon,” said David Goldwyn, chairman of the Atlantic Council Global Energy Center’s Energy Advisory Group and a former State Department envoy for international energy affairs.
The reality that Trump even suggested subsidies indicates the administration is aware of the complications of this venture.

“No company will build a business based on government subsidy,” Goldwyn said.

 
Toronto Escorts