Asia Studios Massage

update - Judge orders Trump admin to reinstate illegally fired CEO of IAF

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
An 'obscure' law keeps blowing up in Trump's face: analysis


President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk's efforts to unilaterally overhaul the federal bureaucracy have faced a number of legal setbacks and NBC News Supreme Court reporter Lawrence Hurley has identified what he believes is the exact reason why.

In his latest piece, Hurley pinpoints the Administrative Procedure Act, which was adopted all the way back in 1946, as a consistent roadblock to all of Trump's schemes.


Hurley describes this particular law as "obscure" and "wonky," but he notes that it has been cited repeatedly and successfully by plaintiffs seeking to block Trump's executive orders.

"Known in abbreviated form as the APA, the law allows judges to throw out federal agency actions that are 'arbitrary and capricious' on various grounds, including failing to articulate why the agencies are changing policy," he explains.

Hurley then lists multiple examples of the APA being used to thwart the Trump administration.

"One example of plaintiffs’ citing the law is a case about Trump’s effort to reduce biomedical research funding, which a coalition of states said 'violates the Administrative Procedure Act in multiple ways,'" he writes. "It fails to 'articulate the basis' for the change and shows 'disregard for the factual findings' that set the current rate.. A judge blocked the policy Monday. On Tuesday, a judge cited the APA in finding that the administration most likely violated the law in removing webpages featuring medical data that health care professionals rely on."


Jonathan Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, tells Hurley that Trump's team has been "sloppy" so far, although he adds that there's still time for the administration to correct its mistakes before cases inevitably head toward the United States Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
Expert flags curious timing of Trump purge as 'crypto scheme' investors lose billions


President Donald Trump's dismantling of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is almost certainly illegal under the separation of powers — but, wrote former Labor Secretary Robert Reich in a lengthy post to Facebook, even beyond that, the timing of the move raises suspicions.


The bureau is the only federal agency solely tasked with policing financial misconduct against banks and other monetary institutions against small-time consumers.

And there might be a reason Trump doesn't want that kind of oversight, wrote Reich.

"Thousands of investors in Trump’s crypto scheme lost $2 billion in just weeks while the Trump Organization racked up $100 million in trading fees," wrote Reich. "Just so happens that the CFPB, which Trump is trying to kill, recently announced new regulations for the crypto industry."

Right around the time of Trump's inauguration, a series of Trump-themed crypto coins became available, which were snatched up by supporters and generated large amounts of value. After the hype faded, many of those same supporters raged that they were taken for a ride.


Reich is not the only one to suspect ulterior motives in the crippling of CFPB.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the brainchild behind the agency in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, suggested this week that tech billionaire Elon Musk, who publicly celebrated as his unelected software engineer allies summarily shut down the bureau, doesn't want the agency around to police his plans to add a financial transactions feature to his X platform, formerly Twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113

NEW: The First Circuit Court of Appeals, led by Chief Judge David Barron, has denied Donald Trump's motion to block a circuit court order forcing the Administration to lift their federal spending freeze.

RETWEET to thank Judge Barron for standing up for the Constitution!
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113

NEW: Federal Judge Angel Kelley has blocked the Trump Administration from cutting National Institute of Health grants to hospitals, universities, and non-profit organizations for medical research.

RETWEET to thank Judge Kelley!
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113

BREAKING: President Trump has fired USAID’s inspector general Paul Martin via an email, just one day after the office released a report critical of the administration’s efforts to weaken the agency.

Removing an IG immediately after a critical report undermines that independence and sends a chilling message to other oversight officials: challenge the administration, and you may lose your job. Actions like this erode trust in government institutions and set a dangerous precedent for retaliatory firings against those tasked with holding power accountable.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,912
67,082
113
In which case, it plays into the mid terms and adds to the controversy that Trump has to deal with.

Assuming that the mid terms happen?
I expect there will be midterms.
It is very possible they are impossible for the GOP to lose, though.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: mandrill

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,912
67,082
113
The sheer goofiness about a fundamental constitutional battle over this half-assed shit boggles the mind. I can understand a battle over a weighty moral issue like slavery vs the fact that slavery was the underpinning of the seceding states' economy. But this is goofus about a senile old fuck doing an inept, unscheduled audit and randomly striking out funding and then being too egotistical to accept the constitutional norm of taking guidance from the court.
It makes more sense to me that it would be about something goofy.
The point here is the power struggle.

If you don't have an issue to believe in, then it is just about whether or not you have the ability to seize power and reset the balance.
If you are challenging the constitutional order for a moral principle then the moral principle might get resolved, defusing the challenge.
Why would you confuse the issue by making it about some kind of higher principle that might hamstring you that way?
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
It makes more sense to me that it would be about something goofy.
The point here is the power struggle.

If you don't have an issue to believe in, then it is just about whether or not you have the ability to seize power and reset the balance.
If you are challenging the constitutional order for a moral principle then the moral principle might get resolved, defusing the challenge.
Why would you confuse the issue by making it about some kind of higher principle that might hamstring you that way?
But it's nuts.

Madison v Marshall is bedrock US constitution, as is the principle that the judiciary interprets the law and the executive accedes to that interpretation.

You can't go anywhere challenging that. You simply end up with a stars-and-stripes version of Russia or Hungary.

Trump doesn't have the popular support to take it anywhere. There will be backlash and his balance of support in Congress and in popular voting support is small. If he does overturn the republic and make himself King Trump, how long does that shit last before the backlash overwhelms him????

If you have a crisis - i.e. the economic collapse of Germany in the 1930's - you can present yourself as a necessary saviour. But you need the crisis and an ideology to focus and rally support.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,912
67,082
113

NEW: The First Circuit Court of Appeals, led by Chief Judge David Barron, has denied Donald Trump's motion to block a circuit court order forcing the Administration to lift their federal spending freeze.

RETWEET to thank Judge Barron for standing up for the Constitution!
Trying to figure out if that Charlie Kirk tweet is a misrepresentation of this order or not.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
34,912
67,082
113

BREAKING: President Trump has fired USAID’s inspector general Paul Martin via an email, just one day after the office released a report critical of the administration’s efforts to weaken the agency.

Removing an IG immediately after a critical report undermines that independence and sends a chilling message to other oversight officials: challenge the administration, and you may lose your job. Actions like this erode trust in government institutions and set a dangerous precedent for retaliatory firings against those tasked with holding power accountable.
It does look like this lawsuit (https://legacy.www.documentcloud.org/documents/25521965-250212-ig-suit/) is pointing out that Trump fired the Inspector Generals who had uncovered ~200 billion in fraud over the last several years.
So it seems Trump and Musk are getting rid of the people who can actually do the job DOGE is pretending to do, because that might get in the way of the lies they want to tell about what DOGE is doing in order to cover up what DOGE is doing.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
Yes, but Brian Krassenstein is a Dem shill!!

I'm pro Leafs. But if I re post the actual score of a Leafs game like Leafs 5 - Oilers 3, then that actually took place even though I prefer the Leafs to the Oilers.

You seem be challenged by the concept of real life events.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
It does look like this lawsuit (https://legacy.www.documentcloud.org/documents/25521965-250212-ig-suit/) is pointing out that Trump fired the Inspector Generals who had uncovered ~200 billion in fraud over the last several years.
So it seems Trump and Musk are getting rid of the people who can actually do the job DOGE is pretending to do, because that might get in the way of the lies they want to tell about what DOGE is doing in order to cover up what DOGE is doing.
Or maybe just Musk is doing that because Trump is too senile and lazy to follow the play?
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
It's what he promised and what a large portion of his voting base wants.
Let's play with this.

Isn't the apex of what he can achieve just a few years of Huey Long style corrupt parody-democracy that reverts back to a more complete - albeit damaged - democratic state when the "Great Leader" dies or is somehow unseated???
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113
NEW: Federal Judge James Boasberg has blocked the Department of Justice from removing January 6th videos from a public database.

RETWEET to thank Judge Boasberg for standing up for our democracy!

 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,132
100,282
113

NEW: Veterans Affairs Inspector General Michael Missal and 7 other federal watchdogs are suing the Trump Administration for being illegally fired and violating federal laws.

RETWEET if you stand with Missal against Trump!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts