UN seeks to help children battling climate change in court

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,386
2,032
113
Ghawar
Aug 28, 2023

A United Nations body on Monday updated a key treaty designed to protect children's rights to strengthen their hand in fighting climate change, as they emerge at the forefront of the battle to protect the planet.

From wildfires in Portugal to fossil fuel projects in the U.S. state of Montana, young plaintiffs have been taking the lead in a burgeoning number of lawsuits seeking more government action on climate change.

In the document, the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child calls environmental degradation, including the climate crisis, "a form of structural violence against children".

It says that states should provide access to justice for children, including through "removing barriers for children to initiate proceedings themselves".

"This could definitely strengthen their hand because now there's a fully articulated set of guidance that pulls everything together in one place," said Ann Skelton, chair of the committee and a South African lawyer, adding that she also hoped businesses and policy makers would draw on the document.

Some 16,000 children across more than 100 countries were consulted as part of a broader dialogue during the two-year drafting period for the guidelines. Tânia dos Santos Maia, a 14-year-old from Brazil, said she expected the U.N. document to make children and adolescents more aware of their rights.

The guidance was broadly welcomed, however, some say it does not go far enough. Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg asked the committee "to be more vigorous and somewhat bolder" during consultations, U.N. committee member Philip Jaffé told Reuters. Thunberg was not immediately available for comment via a spokesperson.

Lawyers representing six young people from Portugal, who are taking 32 countries before the European Court of Human Rights for what they see as government inaction over climate change, said they think it will reinforce their case.

All U.N. countries, barring the United States, have ratified the 1989 child rights convention, which addresses environmental matters but needed updating, given the pace of climate change. The committee's guidance on the convention is often cited by lawyers, and sometimes by courts in rulings.

Thunberg's delegation was not alone in calling for more ambition.

"I think this was such a missed opportunity – it's an exercise in incrementalism instead of taking quantum leap forward," said Kelly Matheson, deputy director of Global Climate Litigation at Our Children's Trust which represented youths in a case where a state judge found against the U.S. state of Montana this month.

She said the U.N. body's guidance limits itself to the 2015 Paris warming target of 1.5 degrees Celsius -- a rise she says is already dangerous for children.

Skelton said the U.N. had to balance its actions as some states were already saying it went too far.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
They should start in China, which produces more emissions than the US and EU combined. Let’s see how Xi deals with them.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,386
2,032
113
Ghawar
The one right youth climate activists and children crying climate
change are entitled to is the right to free vasectomy for boys and free
tubal ligation for girls. That way they can rest assured that they won't
commit the sin of their parents of bringing them into the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazokajoe

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,386
2,032
113
Ghawar
They should start in China, which produces more emissions than the US and EU combined. Let’s see how Xi deals with them.
Climate activism is western world's phenomenon. Greta Thunberg's idea of
climate justice is applicable only in the western world like chastity is fine only
for women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,016
21,955
113
Aug 28, 2023

A United Nations body on Monday updated a key treaty designed to protect children's rights to strengthen their hand in fighting climate change, as they emerge at the forefront of the battle to protect the planet.

From wildfires in Portugal to fossil fuel projects in the U.S. state of Montana, young plaintiffs have been taking the lead in a burgeoning number of lawsuits seeking more government action on climate change.

In the document, the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child calls environmental degradation, including the climate crisis, "a form of structural violence against children".

It says that states should provide access to justice for children, including through "removing barriers for children to initiate proceedings themselves".

"This could definitely strengthen their hand because now there's a fully articulated set of guidance that pulls everything together in one place," said Ann Skelton, chair of the committee and a South African lawyer, adding that she also hoped businesses and policy makers would draw on the document.

Some 16,000 children across more than 100 countries were consulted as part of a broader dialogue during the two-year drafting period for the guidelines. Tânia dos Santos Maia, a 14-year-old from Brazil, said she expected the U.N. document to make children and adolescents more aware of their rights.

The guidance was broadly welcomed, however, some say it does not go far enough. Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg asked the committee "to be more vigorous and somewhat bolder" during consultations, U.N. committee member Philip Jaffé told Reuters. Thunberg was not immediately available for comment via a spokesperson.

Lawyers representing six young people from Portugal, who are taking 32 countries before the European Court of Human Rights for what they see as government inaction over climate change, said they think it will reinforce their case.

All U.N. countries, barring the United States, have ratified the 1989 child rights convention, which addresses environmental matters but needed updating, given the pace of climate change. The committee's guidance on the convention is often cited by lawyers, and sometimes by courts in rulings.

Thunberg's delegation was not alone in calling for more ambition.

"I think this was such a missed opportunity – it's an exercise in incrementalism instead of taking quantum leap forward," said Kelly Matheson, deputy director of Global Climate Litigation at Our Children's Trust which represented youths in a case where a state judge found against the U.S. state of Montana this month.

She said the U.N. body's guidance limits itself to the 2015 Paris warming target of 1.5 degrees Celsius -- a rise she says is already dangerous for children.

Skelton said the U.N. had to balance its actions as some states were already saying it went too far.

Good.

They need all the help they can.

Global Subsidies for Fossil Fuels Skyrocket to $7 trillion per Year, as 2023 Promises to be Hottest on Record
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,009
2,748
113
Climate activism is western world's phenomenon. Greta Thunberg's idea of
climate justice is applicable only in the western world like chastity is fine only
for women.

And when the climate hysteria subsides, the same children (having grown up) can then sue the UN for all the phycological scars and terrorizing caused by the UNs deliberate climate misinformation campaign targeted at children..
yes judge, ANTÓNIO GUTERRES told us we were 'broiling' back in 2023...... that messed me up. School, work, even relationships seemed unimportant

this set of kids will be useless , but the lucky ones who sue will have cashed out
some may cash out twice, sue the govt as a child, then sue the UN as a worthless broken adult
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,016
21,955
113
And when the climate hysteria subsides, the same children (having grown up) can then sue the UN for all the phycological scars and terrorizing caused by the UNs deliberate climate misinformation campaign targeted at children..
yes judge, ANTÓNIO GUTERRES told us we were 'broiling' back in 2023...... that messed me up. School, work, even relationships seemed unimportant

this set of kids will be useless , but the lucky ones who sue will have cashed out
some may cash out twice, sue the govt as a child, then sue the UN as a worthless broken adult
There will be a time when the climate change deniers will wake up and realize they've been actively aiding making the world for their kids much worse.

 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,991
2,475
113
This is one of the reasons why we should stop financially supporting the UN. It's just another way to waste our money.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
That is because they manufacture everything for the US and EU. The US is only 5% of the world and yet consumes 25% of the world's resources. Manufacture everything here and see our emissions go up too.
They are too reliant on Coal. US grid is much cleaner.
 

Attachments

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
People in the developing world who are poor, cannot afford to be worried about these things. They are trying to eat and keep a roof over their heads in many cases. A lot of them are also trying to earn money and move up the ladder and they cannot be told that they need to cut back on something at the risk of staying poor.
I’m not sure China can afford that.

 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
But there are restrictions in sharing nuclear technology or even clean energy technologies, with those countries because it is an opportunity to make money. Don't forget though that 80% of energy in the US still comes from fossil fuels. So it is not as clean as you may think it is.
Not all fossil fuels are equal, We pivoted away from Coal to natural gas and it’s had a huge effect on our emissions. The US emits less than half as much as China with a larger economy.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I wouldn't attribute every climate related catastrophe to climate change. But, if you want China to reduce emissions, then you need to move manufacturing back to the US and watch our emissions go up. Or share technology for free so countries like China and India can both reduce emissions and ensure their population has enough energy to fuel their growth. Both are not happening right now.
Manufacturing will be near/reshored, Mexico is a cheaper place to manufacture than China.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts