Obsession Massage

U.S. Nuclear Weapons Being “Guarded” by Israel

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Strange, one would think Americans should be handling this....:confused:
on a related note, Can you say Chertoff. This Israeli gave the Mexican border fence contract to the highest bidder - Israel...


U.S. Nuclear Weapons Being “Guarded” by Israel
Wednesday, September 26, 2007

American supporters of Israel were delighted to learn that an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems—owned in part by the government of Israel—is in charge of security for the most sensitive nuclear power and weapons storage facilities in the United States.
The largest perimeter security company in the world, Magal started out as a division of Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI)—which was owned in part by the government of Israel. In recent years, however, Magal evolved into a publicly-traded company, although IAI (and thus the government of Israel) still holds a substantial share in the highly successful firm.

What all of this means is that the government of Israel will actually have control over the security of America’s nuclear weapons.
Supporters of Israel say that this is a splendid idea, since Israel is said to be perhaps America’s closest ally on the face of the planet. However, there are some critics who question the propriety of America’s super-sensitive nuclear security being in the hands of any foreign nation, particularly Israel which, even today, officially denies that it is engaged in the production of nuclear arms.

Be that as it may, however, Magal’s global interests are quite broad-ranging. Having secured 90 percent of Israel’s borders through a wide-ranging array of super-modern “space age” technology, Magal has now branched out internationally.

Not only does Magal provide security for American nuclear facilities, but it also does likewise for most major nuclear facilities in Western Europe and Asia. In addition, the Israeli firm also provides security for Chicago’s O’Hare Airport and, for the last fifteen years, has kept watch on the Queen of England’s famed Buckingham Palace in London. What’s more, Magal provides security for 90% of the American prisons that utilize electronic systems. Magal brags that its other clients around the globe include: borders, airports, industrial sites, communication centers, military installations, correctional facilities, government agencies, VIP estates and residences, commercial buildings and storage yards.
There is hardly a major country or major enterprise that does not have Magal’s security specialists keeping a close watch on their activities.

Clearly, Magal is no small enterprise. While 27% of its total sales are in the Israeli market, its largest market is in North America, which currently accounts for 35% of its sales.

However, Magal’s American outreach is expected to increase substantially, especially now that firm has set up a Washington, D.C. office which will promote its products to federal agencies and to the members of Congress who provide funding for federally-supervised security projects across the country at all levels: local, state and national.

And with current U.S. Homeland Security Chief, Michael Chertoff, not only a strong supporter of Israel but also the son of a woman who has strong Israeli ties—even including service with El Al, the national airline of Israel—Magal, owned in party by Israeli Aircraft Industries—will be a clear-cut favorite in the eyes of the power brokers in official Washington who have the power to grant lucrative security contracts.

At the moment, Magal has four U.S.-based subsidiaries: two in California, Stellar Security Products, Inc. and Perimeter Products Inc., as well as the New York-based Smart Interactive Systems, Inc., and the Virginia-based Dominion Wireless, Inc.

All told, the Israeli company holds a 40% share in the worldwide market in perimeter intrusion detection systems and is working to expand its business in the protection of oil pipelines.

Magal is also said to be quite interested in guarding water lines around the globe, particularly in the United States. In fact, Magal may have an inside shot at getting a monopoly in guarding America’s water supplies.

On July 19, the Bush administration’s Environmental Protection Agency announced a “partnership” with the Israeli Ministry of National Infrastructures to improve what they called “water supply system security in the United States and Israel.” Since Magal is so highly respected in Israel, it’s an even bet that Magal will soon be guarding the U.S. water supply.

©2007 America's Real Patriot Act
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Sounds like they have the right experience for the job.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
Sounds like they have the right experience for the job.

OTB
?!?!?!?
Why???
Do they have more experience with nukes than the USA?.....:rolleyes:
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
WoodPeckr said:
?!?!?!?
Why???
Do they have more experience with nukes than the USA?.....:rolleyes:
They seem to be a large security firm, clearly this is a task that has been put out to bid..... should we only take bids from US firms?

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
They seem to be a large security firm, clearly this is a task that has been put out to bid..... should we only take bids from US firms?

OTB
DUH!!!!
When it comes to NUKES, most would say YES!
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
WoodPeckr said:
DUH!!!!
When it comes to NUKES, most would say YES!
So you wouldn't let a Danish or Canadian firm bid on that contract? How about airport security? Where would you draw the line.

OTB
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,978
5,588
113
onthebottom said:
So you wouldn't let a Danish or Canadian firm bid on that contract? How about airport security? Where would you draw the line.

OTB
Denmark and Canada are part of Nato.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
danmand said:
Denmark and Canada are part of Nato.
So companies from NATO countries should be given preferential treatment over non-NATO allied domiciled firms?

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
So you wouldn't let a Danish or Canadian firm bid on that contract? How about airport security? Where would you draw the line.

OTB
Lets get even sillier bot.
What about a low bid from China or Russia!!!!:eek:
These are NUKES, most Americans feel we should be doing this.

PS: as for 'bids', you must have over looked this tidbit:
Can you say Chertoff. This Israeli gave the Mexican border fence contract to the highest bidder - Israel...
....what happened to low bidder wins???......
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,978
5,588
113
onthebottom said:
So companies from NATO countries should be given preferential treatment over non-NATO allied domiciled firms?

OTB
That is part of the US security policy, I believe.
 

jwmorrice

Gentleman by Profession
Jun 30, 2003
7,133
2
0
In the laboratory.
Just a question

Shouldn't guarding its own nuclear weapons be a job for the US military? If they aren't capable of that...well wtf is the world coming to?

jwm
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
jwmorrice said:
Shouldn't guarding its own nuclear weapons be a job for the US military? If they aren't capable of that...well wtf is the world coming to?

jwm
That was EXACTLY MY POINT!.....;)
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
WoodPeckr said:
Lets get even sillier bot.
What about a low bid from China or Russia!!!!:eek:
These are NUKES, most Americans feel we should be doing this.
Who's we? If a Publicly traded company with an HQ in New York get's the bid you're happy even if most of the shares are owned by a Saudi prince? Companies are not like people, they don't have passports.

You could argue that the US government should be doing this work instead of a private contractor, but to raise the issue just because the firm is Israeli is just your anti-Semitic paranoia rearing it's ugly head. Somehow I don't think you'd have this same attitude if it was a UK firm doing the job.

WoodPeckr said:
PS: as for 'bids', you must have over looked this tidbit:
Can you say Chertoff. This Israeli gave the Mexican border fence contract to the highest bidder - Israel...
....what happened to low bidder wins???......
If it was highest bid I did miss that because I don't remember reading it.... the Israelis do have some experience building security walls, unfortunately.

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
jwmorrice said:
Shouldn't guarding its own nuclear weapons be a job for the US military? If they aren't capable of that...well wtf is the world coming to?

jwm
That's a better question. Unfortunately there was no news of value on the real issue because it was obsessed on an Israeli connection.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
bottie,
You miss the whole point and just OBFUSCATE AWAY!!!!!!

The point as raised by me and jwmorrice:

Posted by jwmorrice
Shouldn't guarding its own nuclear weapons be a job for the US military? If they aren't capable of that...well wtf is the world coming to?
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
WoodPeckr said:
bottie,
You miss the whole point and just OBFUSCATE AWAY!!!!!!

The point as raised by me and jwmorrice:

Posted by jwmorrice
Shouldn't guarding its own nuclear weapons be a job for the US military? If they aren't capable of that...well wtf is the world coming to?
If that were your issue with this contract you would have found an article that questioned the wisdom of outsourcing this task, now the national roots of the firm that won the bid.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
If that were your issue with this contract you would have found an article that questioned the wisdom of outsourcing this task, now the national roots of the firm that won the bid.

OTB
I questioned the WHOLE fishy process!
You are bobbing weaving & obfuscating away......:D
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,757
113
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
So, to be clear and fair.

I think it's perfectly valid to question the privatization of this function.

I don't think it is valid to question the national heritage of the firm that won the bid, especially if that heritage is a VERY close ally of the US.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
onthebottom said:
So, to be clear and fair.

I think it's perfectly valid to question the privatization of this function.

I don't think it is valid to question the national heritage of the firm that won the bid, especially if that heritage is a VERY close ally of the US.

OTB
BS!!!
If you put 'limits' on your questioning, then it becomes a sham!......:rolleyes:
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
DonQuixote said:
This should be a government function.

I'm becoming very concerned about the privatization
of governmental functions. The issues in Iraq including
Blackwater raises the possibility of long-term problems.

This issue never seems to be debated.
That's because it is all part of the growing corruption Team 'w' sponsors through privatization.

The military always handled this in the past and should continue to handle this.
Turning it over to civies only leads to more problems.
 
Toronto Escorts