Trump's motives for taking back the Panama Canal revealed.

Previous Thread Next Thread
C

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,712
1,448
113
Trump's motive for taking back the Panama Canal is pure vengeance. Years ago Trump had a Trump branded Hotel in Panama where he was in dispute with the legal owners of the property, there was a stand off where Trump's people barricaded themselves in the office and refused to leave. In the end, the legal system sided with the legal owners of the property. The hotel was re-branded and Trump had no legal recourse to pursue damages. Even though Trump would have no possibility of taking the Panama Canal back for the united States, he may put pressure on Panama to offer better passage fees for American ships using the canal. Failing this. Trump would still make political points with MAGA supporters. It would look like he is trying to do something for his country and Make America Great Again.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76 and Butler1000
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,935
15,545
113
Here we go! All his rightie echo chambers are jumping on board and cheering the takeovers of Panama, Canada, and Greenland.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,935
15,545
113
Shaquille Oatmeal said:
Is PBD supporting taking over Panama Canal?
Asking as I dont wanna waste 20 mins of my time listening to this twat. lmao.
Click to expand...
Yes, he is claiming Trump is 100% correct to demand more say in the canal or take it over for security reasons. All 4 twats believe Trump is right on the mark with Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal.

" In this PBD Podcast clip, the gang dives into Donald Trump's comments on retaking control of the Panama Canal, addressing its historical, economic, and geopolitical significance. They discuss U.S. trade interests, China's growing influence, and the potential global impact of reclaiming this critical asset. "
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76
Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
2,504
1,940
113
squeezer said:
Yes, he is claiming Trump is 100% correct to demand more say in the canal or take it over for security reasons. All 4 twats believe Trump is right on the mark with Greenland, Canada and the Panama Canal.

" In this PBD Podcast clip, the gang dives into Donald Trump's comments on retaking control of the Panama Canal, addressing its historical, economic, and geopolitical significance. They discuss U.S. trade interests, China's growing influence, and the potential global impact of reclaiming this critical asset. "
Click to expand...
Trump says something dumb.
And their job is to intellectualize it and make it look thoughtful.
They think other countries exist only to serve Trump lmao.
 
K

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,120
7,206
113
Shaquille Oatmeal said:
Trump says something dumb.
And their job is to intellectualize it and make it look thoughtful.
They think other countries exist only to serve Trump lmao.
Click to expand...
There has been the term "sane-washing" to describe how Maga world distorts and rationalizes the ridiculous statements to try to twist them into something borderline in touch with reality.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76, SchlongConery and Shaquille Oatmeal
C

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,712
1,448
113
Trump’s grandiose proposals, such as annexing Canada, reclaiming the Panama Canal, and purchasing Greenland, can be likened to the rhetoric of Quebec’s separatist movement. Both rely on bold, unrealistic promises designed to appeal to their base rather than achieve practical outcomes. Trump’s motives appear centered on boosting his personal image and consolidating power, with little genuine intention of realizing these ambitious goals. Similarly, past Quebec separatist leaders often used independence rhetoric as a means to gain influence rather than genuinely striving for full separation.

In Trump’s case, such dramatic posturing could serve the additional purpose of seeking a nearly unattainable third term, potentially shielding himself from legal consequences. However, the feasibility of these proposals, particularly reclaiming the Panama Canal, is nonexistent. Any attempt to do so would require formal negotiations with Panama, a nation that gained sovereignty over the canal through a treaty ratified during President Carter’s administration. Reclaiming the canal, whether through diplomacy or military force, would irreparably damage the United States’ international reputation and violate foundational principles of international law.

On the global stage, Trump’s actions and statements often fuel perceptions of him as erratic or detached from reality, reinforcing skepticism about his capacity for effective leadership.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76 and SchlongConery
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom