Top polling GOP-er is overt anti-semite

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
78,293
95,863
113
http://www.newsweek.com/republican-senate-candidate-free-jews-904652


Overt anti-Semites have been slowly creeping into Republican politics in the aftermath of President Trump’s successful, populist candidacy, and now one of them has a fighting chance of representing the Republican Party in a Senate race.

The man in question is Patrick Little, an extremist with hardline anti-Semitic views who is backed by David Duke and other far-right extremists. Little will be squaring off in a top-two primary with 10 other Republicans as well as Democrats and independents on June 5 for the chance to oppose veteran Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein. According to a recent poll, released last week, he very much has a chance of winning the right to face off with the incumbent.

A poll conducted by local ABC News affiliates along with the polling company Survey USA, suggested that Little is polling at 18 percent of the vote on the Republican ticket, a full 10 points ahead of his next strongest opponent. The 84-year-old Feinstein, who first entered office way back in 1992, at the start of Bill Clinton’s first term, remains a solid favorite to win the state—polling at 39 percent.

It’s unclear how predictive the poll will prove to be, or whether many Californians are intimately familiar with Little’s views, but the notion that he has any viability at all in the state is likely to raise alarm. Little has said he believes Jews should have no say over white non-Jews and wants to see them removed from the country altogether. On Gab, a social media site with large swaths of extremist users, he argues that the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer, whose proprietors praise Adolf Hitler and have appeared to call for acts of violence against Jewish people, is too Jewish.

“I propose a government that makes counter-semitism central to all aims of the state,” he wrote on that website, referring to a white nationalist euphemism for a hatred of Jews. He argued for forbidding “all immigration except of biological kin, where no person of Jewish origin may live, vacation or t**********se.”

Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now

He also wrote that he wanted to keep Americans "free from Jews."

Matt Barreto, a Professor of Political Sciences at UCLA, told Newsweek that while the poll is concerning due to Little’s views, it isn’t a strong indicator that he will ever become Senator.

“There’s been no campaign to speak of. All the discussion has been between Feinstein and [Democratic challenger] Kevin de León,” Barreto said. “I don’t believe that this candidate has much outreach.”

He noted that many people may have no idea who Little is, and are simply responding to the fact that his name was grouped with the Republicans. He said that if his views became more widely known, it would likely sink his candidacy.

“This is the whole reason Trump won the election,” he said. “Republicans voted for a Republican even if they didn’t think they would vote for Trump.”

Barreto noted that Democrats dominate California politics and that the state Republican party is focused on issues of taxation. He described them as being more open-minded than the national party on issues like immigration, gay marriage and marijuana legalization, even if there are pockets of overtly white supremacist voters in places like Orange County.

Little did not respond to a request for comment on this story. His overtly anti-Semitic posts in the runup to an election follow the candidacy of Wisconsin-based Republican congressional candidate Paul Nehlen, who has veered so far to the right that he has been disavowed by some prominent white nationalists.

White Supremacist Richard Spencer wrote on Twitter this month that Nehlen “needs to just go away,” suggesting that he had embarrassed their cause of building a state for only whites by being too openly prejudiced. Most recently, Nehlen appeared on an extremist podcast inspired by racist mass murderer Dylann Roof. It’s unclear whether or not Little, whose political ambitions have so far received less scrutiny than Nehlen’s, will be similarly disavowed.

Little is a vocal fan of Christopher Cantwell, an anti-Semitic podcast host and one of the white nationalists who marched in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August of 2017. Cantwell is an outspoken supporter of Adolf Hitler has made a hatred of Jews the crux of his political argument when he speaks to his audience. He told Newsweek Friday that Little has a slim chance of winning, even if they share the same prejudices.

“I cannot claim to have familiarized myself with the mechanics of that race well enough to say,” Cantwell said. “However, I have my doubts that Holocaust revisionism polls well amongst Californians of any party.”


 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,252
5,377
113
Idiot can't even spell Japanese correctly.

He has a snowball's chance of winning in California anyways as it's a democratic stronghold
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,183
6,929
113
Idiot can't even spell Japanese correctly.

He has a snowball's chance of winning in California anyways as it's a democratic stronghold
And is that supposed to justify the GOP voter support he's getting? Would you be quiet if the Dems ran a supporter of Pol Pot in Wyoming?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,992
23,584
113
Idiot can't even spell Japanese correctly.

He has a snowball's chance of winning in California anyways as it's a democratic stronghold
Trump is still attracting the alt-right, nationalists, white supremacists and anti-semites.
Its your new party.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,252
5,377
113
And is that supposed to justify the GOP voter support he's getting? Would you be quiet if the Dems ran a supporter of Pol Pot in Wyoming?
Unfortunately in a democracy you have accept that even the worst human beings still have a right to vote

Trump is still attracting the alt-right, nationalists, white supremacists and anti-semites.
Its your new party
There's one thing the far Left and far Right have in common, and thats anti-semitism.

Eh Frankie??!! :eyebrows:
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,992
23,584
113
There's one thing the far Left and far Right have in common, and thats anti-semitism.

Eh Frankie??!! :eyebrows:
Nope.

Anti-semitism is a far right thing.
Us left wingers are against racism and argue for equal rights, not apartheid.

Apartheid is a right wing thing, isn't it Phil?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
27,252
5,377
113
Nope.

Anti-semitism is a far right thing.
Us left wingers are against racism and argue for equal rights, not apartheid.

Apartheid is a right wing thing, isn't it Phil?
The more you try to argue the fact, the more guilty you look, and the more it looks like I got under your skin
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,068
0
0
A nothing story about a perennial issue - bad candidates often end up running for seats that their party knows are unwinnable.

Sloppy journalism, nevertheless. Spencer denies that he is a "white supremacist". He describes himself as a white nationalist. I've never seen a quote from him contradicting his own characterization. Spencer says that "Naylen should go away". Not something you would say of someone who you are politically aligned with. Cantwell used the term "holocaust revisionism". That's a term that's not often used by holocaust deniers or anti-semites. He also acknowledges the unacceptability of holocaust revisionism with the public, including supporters of both parties. Even the Southern Poverty Law Centre describes Cantwell as a white nationalist (rather than a white supremacist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cantwell_(white_supremacist).

This article is just another example of how supposedly professional news media such as Newsweek plays with inaccurate labels to make a story play better, rather than just laying out the facts for its readers.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
78,293
95,863
113
A nothing story about a perennial issue - bad candidates often end up running for seats that their party knows are unwinnable.

Sloppy journalism, nevertheless. Spencer denies that he is a "white supremacist". He describes himself as a white nationalist. I've never seen a quote from him contradicting his own characterization. Spencer says that "Naylen should go away". Not something you would say of someone who you are politically aligned with. Cantwell used the term "holocaust revisionism". That's a term that's not often used by holocaust deniers or anti-semites. He also acknowledges the unacceptability of holocaust revisionism with the public, including supporters of both parties. Even the Southern Poverty Law Centre describes Cantwell as a white nationalist (rather than a white supremacist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cantwell_(white_supremacist).

This article is just another example of how supposedly professional news media such as Newsweek plays with inaccurate labels to make a story play better, rather than just laying out the facts for its readers.
Nothing like a white supremacist anti semite to bring out the WHITE knight in Bud.

Gotta defend those "Free Speech Values"......

The issues in the article are the grossly - and weirdly - anti Semitic statements of the candidate, Patrick Little and why the hell the GOP doesn't enact a mechanism to eject wackos from their party. Bud - otoh - is going to argue for pages that Newsweek is "fake news" because it called racist, neo nazi asshole Richard Spencer a "white supremacist" instead of the alt right preferred euphemism of "white nationalist". Get set for 2 or 3 pages of Bud arguing this point.
 

managee

Banned
Jun 19, 2013
1,731
4
0
A nothing story about a perennial issue - bad candidates often end up running for seats that their party knows are unwinnable.

Sloppy journalism, nevertheless. Spencer denies that he is a "white supremacist". He describes himself as a white nationalist. I've never seen a quote from him contradicting his own characterization. Spencer says that "Naylen should go away". Not something you would say of someone who you are politically aligned with. Cantwell used the term "holocaust revisionism". That's a term that's not often used by holocaust deniers or anti-semites. He also acknowledges the unacceptability of holocaust revisionism with the public, including supporters of both parties. Even the Southern Poverty Law Centre describes Cantwell as a white nationalist (rather than a white supremacist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cantwell_(white_supremacist).

This article is just another example of how supposedly professional news media such as Newsweek plays with inaccurate labels to make a story play better, rather than just laying out the facts for its readers.
National Socialists would appreciate your efforts, but your actions are abhorrent at-least to some of the rest of us.

I’m sure to true Nazis there’s a big difference between white nationalists and white supremacists, but to the non-Nazis among us, it’s shades of whatever the most racist colour is.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/06/his-kampf/524505/
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,068
0
0
Nothing like a white supremacist anti semite to bring out the WHITE knight in Bud.

Gotta defend those "Free Speech Values"......

The issues in the article are the grossly - and weirdly - anti Semitic statements of the candidate, Patrick Little and why the hell the GOP doesn't enact a mechanism to eject wackos from their party. Bud - otoh - is going to argue for pages that Newsweek is "fake news" because it called racist, neo nazi asshole Richard Spencer a "white supremacist" instead of the alt right preferred euphemism of "white nationalist". Get set for 2 or 3 pages of Bud arguing this point.
Wrong. There's no point in arguing with you. You accept my corrections, but you simply don't care that there were statements in the article that were inaccurate. I can't be bothered to try to persuade someone why they should care about accuracy. The benefits of accuracy in public discourse seem self evident to me.
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,068
0
0
National Socialists would appreciate your efforts, but your actions are abhorrent at-least to some of the rest of us.

I’m sure to true Nazis there’s a big difference between white nationalists and white supremacists, but to the non-Nazis among us, it’s shades of whatever the most racist colour is.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/06/his-kampf/524505/
I'm sorry that you see my effort to present facts more accurately as abhorrent. I'm not sure how the cause of fighting racism is assisted by inaccuracy. I'm certainly not correcting this reporting for the benefit of National Socialists (whoever they may be in today's world).

Until those opposed to white nationalism (which is what Spencer espouses) meet those arguments as they are actually laid out, as opposed to just writing them off as indistinguishable from white supremacy, people who find succor in those views will be able to tune out the counter protests.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,183
6,929
113
Unfortunately in a democracy you have accept that even the worst human beings still have a right to vote

...
And the point is that obviously the largest number of republican voters there aren't bothered by overt racism. If that doesn't make you uncomfortable, it should.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,183
6,929
113
A nothing story about a perennial issue - bad candidates often end up running for seats that their party knows are unwinnable.....
And they get a big chunk of votes from republicans.

But go on explaining to us why this guy isn't really a racist and split the fine hair between white nationalist and white supremacist. You might not understand but those of us not in your club don't see much difference.

And thanks for admitting you are a fan of Richard Spencer.
 

Bud Plug

Sexual Appliance
Aug 17, 2001
5,068
0
0
And they get a big chunk of votes from republicans.

But go on explaining to us why this guy isn't really a racist and split the fine hair between white nationalist and white supremacist. You might not understand but those of us not in your club don't see much difference.

And thanks for admitting you are a fan of Richard Spencer.
Here's a challenge for you. Try to get just one aspect of my position on these issues correct before the end of the year. If you do, there will be something for me to respond to.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,173
2,700
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
And the point is that obviously the largest number of republican voters there aren't bothered by overt racism. If that doesn't make you uncomfortable, it should.
does that include wealthy whites in manhattan's upper west side that doesn't want black kids to attend schools in their area?
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Disgusting.

- - - - -

California has a very strange electoral system. Since 2001 there have in effect been no party primaries there is basically a general election in which every announced candidate of every party participates. Then when everyone else has a general election in November with the candidates of the various political parties participating, in California there is instead a runoff election between the two candidates who got the most votes in June regardless of party. A system like this virtually guarantees that those running in November will have received but a small fraction of the vote in June.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts