That poor man has done time.Maybe Todd isn't as dumb as everyone thinks....:clap2:
You mean, he can actually read??!!I think Todd finally finished reading the book, lol.
His job is to read aloud for Ms. Palin.You mean, he can actually read??!!
It was okay for conservatives to refer to Enquirer for John Edwards' scandal, why not this?Wow a newspaper referring to the National Enquirer as if it's a trusted source of fact, that is funny.
Don't knock the Enguirer. They've broken a lot of stories and other guys were saying "bunk"
Hubby doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who wants to hob nob around the beltway attending parties with phonies. He'd rather be out riding his snow machine, fishing and hoisting some beers with the boys. My guess - he's just plain sick of all the bullshit. He never signed on for this kind of fucked up life.
Agree with this assessment. The Keep-Your-Mouth-Shut-and-Smile-Our-Way-to-The-Bank routine has probably taken its toll on the poor boy, and they probably have an agreement to have cashed in on the facade to a certain point, and now that they have cashed in, he's free to go. Talk about a kept man.Don't knock the Enguirer. They've broken a lot of stories and other guys were saying "bunk"
Hubby doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who wants to hob nob around the beltway attending parties with phonies. He'd rather be out riding his snow machine, fishing and hoisting some beers with the boys. My guess - he's just plain sick of all the bullshit. He never signed on for this kind of fucked up life.
Most people didn't believe it at first because it was the National Enquirer that broke the story. Then again it was about the first truthful breaking story they had published in at least three decades.It was okay for conservatives to refer to Enquirer for John Edwards' scandal.
The bits have been around for a couple days. Time will tell if that's indeed the case.Wow a newspaper referring to the National Enquirer as if it's a trusted source of fact, that is funny.
Well, the teabagging Neo Con do what they do, as always.It was okay for conservatives to refer to Enquirer for John Edwards' scandal, why not this?
SHOCKINGLY they had some incredible inside information and sources, so it's fair game.
Most people didn't believe it at first because it was the National Enquirer that broke the story. Then again it was about the first truthful breaking story they had published in at least three decades.