I asked this in the other thread about this topic and got no answer, but just wondering..... (for those of you who know union mentality)......
For anyone who knows how police unions think, whose side does the typical union member side with in this case?
Let's face it, when a cop does something stupid against the public, they all rally and try to protect their own butts. It's never their fault, sergeant gets on a stage and protects his officer, you know the drill. One big buddy buddy system where they all keep their mouths shut and hope nobody notices and films it.
But this time, it's cop vs cop.
So is the average cop rooting for the the accused party to be guilty as they assaulted one of their own? Or are they hoping they get off scott free because it helps protect their image?
Curious.