Thoughts/Experiences on "What's your price"

[voldomort]

I noticed this site recently (it's been around for years). I know there's a ban on talking about SA but this site is decidedly different. I know there are lot's of wannabe SBs on the site but the fundamental model is to provide an incentive to a woman to give guy a chance (first date, no sex). At first, this seems kind of ridiculous and pathetic for the man paying to simply go on a no-sex date with a younger, better looking girl. Normally, this girl would only be dating Chads and would swipe right (no) 100% of the time. The interesting thing and the reason I'm asking the Terb community is that apparently, woman suck at choosing men. They have very unrealistic expectations and tend to have problems getting into meaningful relationships. The Chads of the world will date them and fuck them silly, but these same Chads won't stick around because they have many other chicks to fuck. Look at the following excerpt from an Atlantic article:

Link to article

The design and marketing of dating apps further encourage a cold, odds-based approach to love. While they have surely created, at this point, thousands if not millions of successful relationships, they have also aggravated, for some men, their feeling that they are unjustly invisible to women.

Men outnumber women dramatically on dating apps; this is a fact. A 2016 literature review also found that men are more active users of these apps—both in the amount of time they spend on them and the number of interactions they attempt. Their experience of not getting as many matches or messages, the numbers say, is real.

But data sets made available by the apps can themselves be wielded in unsettling ways by people who believe the numbers are working against them. A since-deleted 2017 blog post on the dating app Hinge’s official website explained an experiment conducted by a Hinge engineer, Aviv Goldgeier. Using the Gini coefficient, a common measure of income inequality within a country, and counting “likes” as income, Goldgeier determined that men had a much higher (that is, worse) Gini coefficient than women. With these results, Goldgeier compared the “female dating economy” to Western Europe and the “male dating economy” to South Africa. This is, obviously, an absurd thing to publish on a company blog, but not just because its analysis is so plainly accusatory and weakly reasoned. It’s also a bald-faced admission that the author—and possibly the company he speaks for—is thinking about people as sets of numbers.

In a since-deleted 2009 official blog post, an OkCupid employee’s data analysis showed women rating men as “worse-looking than medium” 80 percent of the time, and concluded, “Females of OkCupid, we site founders say to you: ouch! Paradoxically, it seems it’s women, not men, who have unrealistic standards for the opposite sex.” This post, more than a decade later, is referenced in men’s-rights or men’s-interest subreddits as “infamous” and “we all know it.”

Obviously, 80% of the woman cannot reject 80% of men. But it does explain the current dating scene. Basically, 80% of woman are chasing after the 20% of men who are Chads or close to. Only the Chads are happy. So enter something like "What's your price". You can get a girls attention for one night who most likely would never give you a first chance. And it's very possible you could charm her into actually liking and fucking you (assuming you aren't inviting a 10 to dinner when you are a 5). As long as you don't overreach, it's possible you could end up getting far higher quality woman than traditional dating. Now the one thing this ignores is that many woman are hesitant to use a service such as what's your price for various reasons. Therefore, the girls that actually use the site may tend to be more money oriented and less open to an actual relationship developing. However, most people would agree that chemistry is not something that can be forced or prevented - it simply happens in the right circumstances with the correct combination of two people. Therefore, no matter how resistant to relationships she might think she is, she is still very much vulnerable to chemistry developing.

Anyways, thought this was an interesting take on a fairly well known subject. Interest in thoughts/experiences from others. I realize this post is more for single guys, but for married guys, good chance your status may change anyways. Take it from me, it can happen to anyone

 

[oral.com]

I noticed this site recently (it's been around for years). I know there's a ban on talking about SA but this site is decidedly different. I know there are lot's of wannabe SBs on the site but the fundamental model is to provide an incentive to a woman to give guy a chance (first date, no sex). At first, this seems kind of ridiculous and pathetic for the man paying to simply go on a no-sex date with a younger, better looking girl. Normally, this girl would only be dating Chads and would swipe right (no) 100% of the time. The interesting thing and the reason I'm asking the Terb community is that apparently, woman suck at choosing men. They have very unrealistic expectations and tend to have problems getting into meaningful relationships. The Chads of the world will date them and fuck them silly, but these same Chads won't stick around because they have many other chicks to fuck. Look at the following excerpt from an Atlantic article:

Link to article



Obviously, 80% of the woman cannot reject 80% of men. But it does explain the current dating scene. Basically, 80% of woman are chasing after the 20% of men who are Chads or close to. Only the Chads are happy. So enter something like "What's your price". You can get a girls attention for one night who most likely would never give you a first chance. And it's very possible you could charm her into actually liking and fucking you (assuming you aren't inviting a 10 to dinner when you are a 5). As long as you don't overreach, it's possible you could end up getting far higher quality woman than traditional dating. Now the one thing this ignores is that many woman are hesitant to use a service such as what's your price for various reasons. Therefore, the girls that actually use the site may tend to be more money oriented and less open to an actual relationship developing. However, most people would agree that chemistry is not something that can be forced or prevented - it simply happens in the right circumstances with the correct combination of two people. Therefore, no matter how resistant to relationships she might think she is, she is still very much vulnerable to chemistry developing.

Anyways, thought this was an interesting take on a fairly well known subject. Interest in thoughts/experiences from others. I realize this post is more for single guys, but for married guys, good chance your status may change anyways. Take it from me, it can happen to anyone

Chads?

 

[xmontrealer]

Chads?

Chad = Slang term for good looking alpha male that many women find sexually attractive.

 

[LC18]

I wouldn't use it for a serious relationship, just like I wouldn't use Tinder. Of course some people have met on there and are in serious relationship but those cases are probably rare. Especially a website like WYP. I would be afraid that it would just be a bunch of people collecting date money, you'd be better using Tinder and offering money (not on the app because they will ban you).

I can make a thread on what has worked with me on Tinder, sometimes it can be good to have a woman's perspective.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Chads?

Chad is an Incel term referring to men that women find attractive. The female equivalent is referred to as a Stacey. Incels spend countless hours brooding and complaining about how unfair it is that Chads get all the sex. When Incels go on killing sprees it is typically to take revenge on all of the Chads and Staceys whom they blame for all of their problems.

 

[voldomort]

Chad is an Incel term referring to men that women find attractive. The female equivalent is referred to as a Stacey. Incels spend countless hours brooding and complaining about how unfair it is that Chads get all the sex. When Incels go on killing sprees it is typically to take revenge on all of the Chads and Staceys whom they blame for all of their problems.

Just want to note that although the incel movement is disgusting in it's hatred of woman, the way they describe Chad and Stacey does appear to be real. Whereas Incels think it's some awful thing woman are doing, the reality is that's more of a cruel trick of nature, given the way men are (have as much sex as possible), and given the way woman are (I'm going to fuck the hottest guy I can). Apologies to anyone offended by the use of these terms. The Incel community really is pathetic and should be disbanded. It's just I've seen YouTubers who aren't incels, using the Chad, Stacey example so I figured it was ok.

 

[voldomort]

I wouldn't use it for a serious relationship, just like I wouldn't use Tinder. Of course some people have met on there and are in serious relationship but those cases are probably rare. Especially a website like WYP. I would be afraid that it would just be a bunch of people collecting date money, you'd be better using Tinder and offering money (not on the app because they will ban you).

I can make a thread on what has worked with me on Tinder, sometimes it can be good to have a woman's perspective.

I would love to hear what you have to say...

 

[TeeJay]

Most of them are pros

 

[y2kmark]

Most of them are pros

and you are a rank amateur?

 

[y2kmark]

Oh, and my Price is certainly Vincent...

 

[JackBurton]

Women in the dating pool in Toronto overestimate their marketability. Once they are north of 30, they realize that men’s attention will always be on the mid 20’s something’s.

if a woman hasn’t locked down a long term partner by 29, she finds the dating pool dries up very quickly.

there is no conceivable reason to pay women to go on a sexless date. There’s so much supply in Toronto that it’s East to play them off each other.



the old adage: women choose whom to have sex with but men choose whom to marry

 

[decoy2673]

This thread is sad. Go pay and fuck some SP's so you can stop obsessing about dating. id rather be single my entire life than pay someone to spend time with me (dating, friendship, any other scenario). Have some self respect man.

 

[voldomort]

This thread is sad. Go pay and fuck some SP's so you can stop obsessing about dating. id rather be single my entire life than pay someone to spend time with me (dating, friendship, any other scenario). Have some self respect man.

Thanks for the valuable contribution! I already pay to fuck SPs. I also date and fuck civies. I'm over 40 so dating a hot 22 year old or younger student is pretty much impossible without money being involved (don't worry, I haven't given up - red pill all the way!). So firstly, sex with a SP (shower, fuck, shower, bye) has nothing to do with dating sex (spending time with the person before and after sex - normally leads to much better sex). Secondly, you are paying that someone because they would never look in your direction ever - so you either give up and fuck whatever Tinder decides you are allowed to fuck or you try something different.

I am by no means sold on the site - I think the site is actually pretty shitty and most of the girls are pretty scary. However, I posted the thread to stimulate conversation about the subject since I was bored. Seeking arrangement and what's your price exist and continue to exist because they are meeting an unmet need. Woman are not the submissive little barbies we think they are, where we big hulk like men charm them so much they immediately open their legs. Woman have much more flexibility with respect to the reasons why they date you. And hey, if it turns into a relationship you enjoy, why not? I'm not looking for someone to marry, I'm looking for someone to fuck for a while, then move on. Isn't that what we all want (in addition to SPs of course, we could never stop that).

 

[TeeJay]

and you are a rank amateur?

From a technical standpoint not even close but not for the reasons you are thinking

 

[Insidious Von]

Incels need help.