This Sex Offender’s Jail Sentence Is Being Postponed So He Doesn’t Miss School

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Former junior hockey player Connor Neurauter pleaded guilty to sexual interference of a 13-year-old girl.

Manisha Krishnan

Jan 8 2018, 1:28pm

Connor Neurauter pleaded guilty to sexual interference of a 13-year-old girl. Photo via Facebook

A former junior hockey player convicted of sexual interference of a 13-year-old girl will not start his three-month jail sentence until May so that he doesn’t have to miss any school.

Connor Neurauter, 21, pleaded guilty to sexual interference for soliciting nude photos of the teenage girl and later using them to threaten her to keep their relationship a secret, Kamloops This Week reports. He was sentenced to 90 days in jail last week but that sentence is being pushed off until May so it doesn’t cut into his current semester at the University of Calgary.

Neurauter was originally facing an additional charge of child pornography. According to Kamloops This Week, he had a 2016 court date adjourned because he was at camp with his hockey team.

Over the course of Neurauter’s relationship with the girl, she told police he once choked her with his hands and later asked her for naked photographs in texts and on Snapchat. Eventually she told a girlfriend who is 14; the friend sent Neurauter nude photos of herself in an attempt to get him to leave the victim alone. Neurauter was arrested after the friend told her mother what was going on and she called police.

The girl read aloud a victim impact statement in court saying she was paranoid that she would run into Neurauter when out in public.

“I was very scared because he knew where I lived and knew where my room was,” she said.

The victim’s mother told the Calgary Sun she’s frustrated by how many concessions the court has made to accommodate Neurauter’s schedule.

“‘Sorry, he’s unavailable for court because he has a hockey tournament. He’s unavailable for court because he has exams. He’s unavailable to come do his plea on his own because he’s in the middle of studying’,” she said.

“Let’s postpone his jail sentence until May so he can finish his year of university. Nobody has stood up and said no, during the whole thing—there was not one time where the judge or even the Crown said ‘please, this is not right.’ The victims are the ones who have been paying over and over, every time we went to court.”

The case seems to be part of a trend through which the courts accommodate young men guilty of violence against women.

Last month, VICE reported on a case out of Newfoundland in which a 21-year-old man was given an absolute discharge after pleading guilty to assaulting his ex-girlfriend. Judge Lori Marshall said the abuser, Lancelot Saunders, will be “very successful in life.”

“You’re a young person with your whole life ahead of you and the implications of a criminal conviction, a permanent criminal record, could have longstanding repercussions for you,” she said, noting a conviction would prevent him from getting into university.

Hockey player and Queen’s University student, Chance Macdonald, who assaulted a teenage girl at a party, was not sentenced until last September so that his internship at Deloitte would remain in tact.

Barb Macquarrie, community director at Western University's Centre for Research and Education on Violence against Women and Children, told VICE the justice system is sending the message that these crimes aren’t serious enough to be dealt with immediately.

“I’m sure it took a lot for her to come forward, a lot,” she said of Neurauter’s 13-year-old victim. “She got very minimal validation from the system. It’s almost as if the system is apologizing to the offender.”

Macquarrie said she would like to see more straight talk in courtrooms so that offenders like Neurauter understand the gravity of their actions. The alleged choking is a very high risk behaviour that doesn’t appear to have been addressed by the court, she said.

“We’re potentially missing some warning signs of somebody who could become a much more dangerous offender,” she said.

In sentencing, judges factor in mitigation and rehabilitation, though Macquarrie was skeptical that non-athletes and men of colour would be treated with the same leniency as offenders like Neurauter and Macdonald. While Macquarrie said there’s no problem with allowing an offender to continue their education, “unless they really, really come to terms with how problematic this behaviour is, they don’t have much a future anyway.”

Neurauter's sentence, which includes two years of probation, will commence May 4. He will also have to register as a sex offender and his DNA will be included in the national database.

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/d344zv/this-sex-offenders-jail-sentence-is-being-postponed-so-he-doesnt-miss-school?utm_campaign=Global&utm_source=vicefbca
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,046
48
48
And people wonder why women don't bother with using the system when assaulted.

They live with pain, emotional scars, sometimes physical scars for life but hey - let's make sure the assailant is able to finish school so we don't fuck up his life time-line.

What a fucking joke.
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
I suppose I could have some sympathy when it comes to allowing him finish his studies, although even that would be a stretch.
But to postpone something because of a hockey tournament? Come on!
 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,756
519
113
Victims should start turning to the civil courts and filing lawsuits in these cases. Unfortunately the Liberals and NDP are notoriously soft on crime and punishment so don’t expect things to change anytime soon.
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,142
2,471
113
Unfortunately the Liberals and NDP are notoriously soft on crime and punishment so don’t expect things to change anytime soon.
What a sad warped biased view and typical of right wing bullshit rhetoric. Why not specifically give an example of the change the federal law on sexual assault from the same laws under Harper ?

I don't agree with the sentence and I wonder if it is because the crime is committed over the internet that judges have little to guide them on sentencing. A convicted criminal has a means to appeal a conviction, is there a similar avenue for victim/victim's family to appeal a sentence or plea deal ? (I would have been first in line if a public appeal could reverse the Karla Homoka 'deal with the devil'.)
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,043
100
48
Victims should start turning to the civil courts and filing lawsuits in these cases. Unfortunately the Liberals and NDP are notoriously soft on crime and punishment so don’t expect things to change anytime soon.
The unfortunate thing with civil court is that the 'victim' has to pay up for their own lawyer... and if things go south for them and they happen to lose, they can be compelled to pay part of the court costs for the 'guilty party'.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts