The 2024 US Presidential election

[Frankfooter]

I know nothing about THIS particular lawsuit except for the information contained in the two links from post #1,391. The 1989 newpaper ad is mentioned in both links.

Unlike many readers, however, I don't draw conclusions from headlines, and I don't immediately believe something is true, just because it's posted on the Internet. I analyze what I read, with skepticism, as opposed to reacting emotionally to the gist.

Unbiased journalism is a thing of the past, and sorely missed. Whenever a reporter writes news from the perspective of their own beliefs, rather than from the facts, I'm less inclined to believe what they have to say.

For me, politics is more of a source for amusement than a raison d'être, and that especially applies to 'identity politics'.

trump is on record on this one as being on the wrong side, that after they were fully exhonerated he still wanted them prison.
Totally in character with his routine today.

 

[Valcazar]

I know nothing about THIS particular lawsuit except for the information contained in the two links from post #1,391. The 1989 newpaper ad is mentioned in both links.

Then why are you commenting on something you admit you know nothing about?

Unlike many readers, however, I don't draw conclusions from headlines, and I don't immediately believe something is true, just because it's posted on the Internet. I analyze what I read, with skepticism, as opposed to reacting emotionally to the gist.

This appears not to be true, since you have spent numerous posts now arguing about something that is beside the point to the defamation lawsuit, which you would know if you read the articles.

Unbiased journalism is a thing of the past, and sorely missed. Whenever a reporter writes news from the perspective of their own beliefs, rather than from the facts, I'm less inclined to believe what they have to say.

There has never been unbiased journalism and no one who actually reads journalism and analyzes it knows that.
It's not "a thing of the past", it's "a thing that never existed".

For me, politics is more of a source for amusement than a raison d'être, and that especially applies to 'identity politics'.

Your flaws do not particularly interest me.

 

[onomatopoeia]

Then why are you commenting on something you admit you know nothing about?



This appears not to be true, since you have spent numerous posts now arguing about something that is beside the point to the defamation lawsuit, which you would know if you read the articles.



There has never been unbiased journalism and no one who actually reads journalism and analyzes it knows that.
It's not "a thing of the past", it's "a thing that never existed".



Your flaws do not particularly interest me.

I don't have time for this shit. I posted my opinions. If you don't agree with them, it's no skin off my nose.