Long time lurker here.
Here is a topic for discussion - tattoos and photos. A number of providers have tattoos ranging from one or two very discrete and small ones to large tattoos covering most of their body. I have noticed that some providers proudly display their ink while others edit their photos to remove them.
To the hobbyists here - what are you thoughts on this? Don't care either way, feel the provider is being a bit deceptive in order to secure a session, etc. Does it change the way you perceive the provider or affect whether you will repeat?
To the providers here - what are your thoughts on this? One basis for the removal is safety - don't want to have anything that can identify you. This works if your photos are "faceless". What about those providers who show their face but still edit out their tattoos?
Here is a topic for discussion - tattoos and photos. A number of providers have tattoos ranging from one or two very discrete and small ones to large tattoos covering most of their body. I have noticed that some providers proudly display their ink while others edit their photos to remove them.
To the hobbyists here - what are you thoughts on this? Don't care either way, feel the provider is being a bit deceptive in order to secure a session, etc. Does it change the way you perceive the provider or affect whether you will repeat?
To the providers here - what are your thoughts on this? One basis for the removal is safety - don't want to have anything that can identify you. This works if your photos are "faceless". What about those providers who show their face but still edit out their tattoos?