The One Spa

Study: Male circumcision helps prevent 2 STDs

jwmorrice

Gentleman by Profession
Jun 30, 2003
7,133
1
0
In the laboratory.
Study: Male circumcision helps prevent 2 STDs
By ALICIA CHANG, AP Science Writer Alicia Chang, AP Science Writer Wed Mar 25, 5:51 pm ET

LOS ANGELES –
Circumcision not only protects against HIV in heterosexual men, but it also helps prevent two other sexually transmitted infections, a large new study found. Circumcised males reduced their risk of infection with HPV, or human papillomavirus, by 35 percent and herpes by 28 percent. However, researchers found circumcision had no effect on the transmission of syphilis.

Landmark studies from three African countries including Uganda previously found circumcision lowered men's chance of catching the AIDS virus by up to 60 percent. The new study stems from the Uganda research and looked at protection against three other STDs. The findings are reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine

"Evidence now strongly suggests that circumcision offers an important prevention opportunity and should be widely available," Drs. Matthew Golden and Judith Wasserheit of the University of Washington wrote in an accompanying editorial.

Worldwide, only about 30 percent of men are circumcised. The figure is higher in the United States, where about 79 percent of men are circumcised, according to surveys by the National Center for Health Statistics.

An international team of researchers who conducted the study said circumcision, the surgical removal of the foreskin from the penis, should be an accepted method to reduce sexually transmitted infections among heterosexuals.

"It must be emphasized that protection was only partial, and it is critical to promote the practice of safe sex," they wrote.

HPV can cause cervical cancer and genital warts. Herpes greatly increases the chances of infection with HIV.

The American Academy of Pediatrics previously said there was not enough evidence to recommend routine circumcision of infants. The doctor's group is reviewing its position based on recent studies. About 2,800 herpes cases in newborns occur in the U.S. every year transmitted from mothers to infants that can lead to disability or death.

The latest research involved 3,393 HIV-negative heterosexual adolescent boys and men from Uganda who were part of the original HIV study. About half were randomly selected to undergo circumcision right away while the rest had the procedure 2 years later. All had physical exams and were offered voluntary HIV counseling and condoms.

After two years, herpes infection was detected in 114 circumcised men compared with 153 uncircumcised men. HPV was detected in 42 circumcised men compared with 80 uncircumcised men. There was no significant difference between the two groups on rate of syphilis infections. The researchers considered condom use, number of sex partners and other factors to calculate the risk reductions.

Why circumcision may reduce the risk of infection is not entirely known. But researchers think cells in the foreskin of the penis may be susceptible to HPV and the herpes virus.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation. It was conducted by the Rakai Health Sciences Program and Makerere University in Uganda, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and a division of the National Institutes of Health.

The results were similar to two recent studies from South Africa that found circumcision reduced HPV and herpes by up to a third.

Researchers plan to study whether circumcision reduces the spread of HPV to female sex partners.

___

On the Net:

New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org

Male circumcision clearinghouse: http://www.malecircumcision.org
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
I said this before and I'll say it again: "The Good Lord gave men a foreskin for a reason. Don't question the wisdom of the Good Lord and don't mess with nature!" Do we chop off the labia minora in women? (Another "cut guy" conspiracy and marketing ploy by "cut" doctors.) On the other hand, I would like to keep an open mind on this issue.:)
 

chiller_boy

New member
Apr 1, 2005
919
0
0
Madison Doll said:
This is a very interesting study. I wonder what population was included and what the use of condoms is like in that area. From what I understand HPV is transmitted condom or not-however it would seem if someone was wearing a condom it wouldn't matter if they were circ or not.

hmmmmm

I agree. Even though the report says that condom use was considered in the final numbers some of this doesnt make sense. Like you say, if condoms are used, the part of the penis that is cut is covered. How could there be a difference? Is the report saying that disease particles can filter thru the condom and infect an uncut penis ? Now THAT would be serious stuff.
 

ebhobbs

Resident foot lover
Jan 22, 2009
185
0
0
I recently got circumcised (I'm 25).. the surgery recovery was not too bad, but waiting for the scars and stuff to heal took almost 5 weeks, and sometimes it was quite painful. I'm just thankful it's over

I'm fully healed now, but I've found that I'm not quite as sensitive as I used to be when I'm having sex with my S/O.. maybe this will change as I get used to having sex more often being circumcised
 
ebhobbs said:
I recently got circumcised (I'm 25).. the surgery recovery was not too bad, but waiting for the scars and stuff to heal took almost 5 weeks, and sometimes it was quite painful. I'm just thankful it's over

I'm fully healed now, but I've found that I'm not quite as sensitive as I used to be when I'm having sex with my S/O.. maybe this will change as I get used to having sex more often being circumcised
5 weeks? Holy crap!

When I had mine done I couldn't walk for nearly a year! :D
 
Last edited:

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
75,940
85,725
113
I believe the studies have been criticized in that circumcised African men in some countries are likely to be Muslim and thus, to inhabit a culture which is less promiscuous than non-Muslim. It has been suggested that this is the real reason for the difference in infection rates.
 

ebhobbs

Resident foot lover
Jan 22, 2009
185
0
0
Cycleguy007 said:
5 weeks? Holy crap!

When I have mine done I couldn't walk for nearly a year! :D

Did you have complications after your surgery? I had almost no problems except for when the skin was forming and sometimes got stuck to the boxer-brief. Having to rip your member off of your boxers is so painful, i teared up quite a few times.
 

toughb

"The Gatekeeper"
Aug 29, 2006
6,731
0
0
Asgard
"my mom put vaseline on it so it would stick to my diaper!"

Man that is cruel...:)
 

to-guy69

New member
Mar 28, 2004
1,469
0
0
Sonic Temple
If 80% of the US is circumsized then why does the US have one of the highest rates of STDs in the industrialized world?
 

dcbogey

New member
Sep 29, 2004
3,170
0
0
Rockslinger said:
I said this before and I'll say it again: "The Good Lord gave men a foreskin for a reason. Don't question the wisdom of the Good Lord and don't mess with nature!" Do we chop off the labia minora in women? (Another "cut guy" conspiracy and marketing ploy by "cut" doctors.) On the other hand, I would like to keep an open mind on this issue.:)
The "Good Lord" also gave us an appendix, and he gave men nipples. The purpose of those are????
 
Toronto Escorts