I'm calling bullshit on you.
There's zero proof in either part of your statement... We don't know that you actually know the judge OR that you know that his ruling has nothing to do with class or wealth... Is the ruling available online yet so we can see? I'm not making a judgement yet but it does seem a tad light but I don't know anything other than what was reported in the media.
I suspect that oagre is correct. I have met him and he is a straightforward guy. I know he is a lawyer so I think he is telling the truth when he says he knows the judge.
Not exactly true. The courtroom became unruly so the ruling was handed to crown and counsel and is available to the public.
Judging by how frequently he's on his knees for Ford, he was certainly on the receiving end.
This is a forum on the Internet... anyone can say anything! Even you said you suspect and think he’s telling the truth... doesn’t mean much! I can say I met his neighbour’s dog walkers cousin and know he was bribed... who to trust? Credibility can’t be proven here so it can’t be used therefore calling bullshit doesn’t mean jack didly.
Your own logic applies to you. Likely nothing you have to say is of any merit and is open to question.
The fact these rapists weren't tried as adults is the tell privilege was involved.
Depdends. The school iffers scholarships for athletes. So its possible the kids are not rich. Some are there bevause of their talent.
Judge can be great but he still got it wrong.
Sorry should have separated my posts. I didn't mean to quote all of that to you. I know you're a good guy and see it for what it should have been and what it ended up being.
