I think sp's should be able to post reviews under an anoymous name about the clients, without mentioning the clients name either. These reviews are to one sided, there should be more input from the sp's. I know there the one's taking the money but the clients gladly pay it. The sp's should be able to say if the guy was great or if his breath stunk or was butt ugly. Alot of clients think they look like George Clooney when they look more like George Wendt (Norm from Cheers). I wonder how many guys out of 10 clients the girl is actually attracted to, 2 maybe, the other 8 she can't wait to be done, it's only human nature. I'd like to know when they're walking up to that hotel room door or opening up their incall door, do they say 'an hour with him-gag' or are they pleasantly surprised. Both sides enter into these arrangements willingly so I'd like to hear from both sides, although i don't think it will ever happen. The sp's have to remain anonymous so it doesn't hurt their business, I just would like to hear their experiences.
sp's should also post reviews
- Thread starter BallzDeep
- Start date
why the hell would we want to seeing as your privacy is our main concern
i have been asked by a few clients to do this, and really i'm not interested in the least. i have no need to tell them on a public board how good they are i do it in person
i have been asked by a few clients to do this, and really i'm not interested in the least. i have no need to tell them on a public board how good they are i do it in person
....................calloway said:
ok lets put it this way they get reviewed in private forums is that better Mr C
guy if you want to hear their experiences just read the reviews the guys write
You're far too serious again Luv... go have another Tim Horton's coffee.
The guy just comes on with a suggestion that is actually supporting SP's and some of the challenges they may face.
The guy just comes on with a suggestion that is actually supporting SP's and some of the challenges they may face.
your right i am cranky so sue me. i just think that it isn't a good idea, and the topic has been posted before. i my self wouldn't!!!
i posted my view
enough said i'll shut up now k
i posted my view
enough said i'll shut up now k
client thread
all I'm saying is that I would like to see client review thread that is completely anonymous, an sp could say that she saw this guy a month or so ago and was simply not attracted to him or was so turned off by him and couldn't get into the session, general stuff. This might offset some bad reviews, most sp's by nature won't tell a client to their face if they weren't attracted to them. I guess the sp's wouldn't want their thread name getting out, they could change it regularily. No names or dates would be given, if you saw the guy two nights ago, say it was a month ago or recently. Lady4lust, if you read this, please read it thoroughly before you respond.
all I'm saying is that I would like to see client review thread that is completely anonymous, an sp could say that she saw this guy a month or so ago and was simply not attracted to him or was so turned off by him and couldn't get into the session, general stuff. This might offset some bad reviews, most sp's by nature won't tell a client to their face if they weren't attracted to them. I guess the sp's wouldn't want their thread name getting out, they could change it regularily. No names or dates would be given, if you saw the guy two nights ago, say it was a month ago or recently. Lady4lust, if you read this, please read it thoroughly before you respond.
It's not a bad idea. Maybe if the SP were so inclined, she could set up a blog to share her reviews.
i'm talking a regular thread on their homepage, client reviews, completely anomymous, stuff like why some clients get certain services and others don't for the same price, i know ymmv, be more detailed on the reasons. i just think it would be a popular thread, guys might find out more ways to improve thier session. i'm new, but i found reading reviews from one point of view isn't subjective enough, i've also noticed there aren't many sp's who contribute because they have to reveal their identity possibly. if they didn't, more sp's might contribute. what is the sense in having 800 clients and 10 sp's contributing?
In case you werent aware, the "ER" in TERB stands for "Escort Review". If you'd like to start a Client Review board, I'm sure Fred would be happy to help you set up TCRB.guy27 said:
This topic has been discussed to death over the years, and the fact that it hasnt happened yet might tell you something.
This topic pops up every six months or so.
Guy27 I expect you to start a thread on dating dancers once this thread runs its course.
I will answer like I have so many times before -
Once an SP starts paying me for my services, then she can review me.
Guy27 I expect you to start a thread on dating dancers once this thread runs its course.
I will answer like I have so many times before -
Once an SP starts paying me for my services, then she can review me.
too much sausage
I guess i understand now but there's just too many guys on these threads, it's like a sausage party,when i log on i don't want to read about some guy suing future shop, who the fuck cares. why doesn't he open a sfsrb (suing future shop review board). at least i'm on topic, i'll watch the news to find out about global warming and gas shortages. i thought there would be more input from the sp's.
I guess i understand now but there's just too many guys on these threads, it's like a sausage party,when i log on i don't want to read about some guy suing future shop, who the fuck cares. why doesn't he open a sfsrb (suing future shop review board). at least i'm on topic, i'll watch the news to find out about global warming and gas shortages. i thought there would be more input from the sp's.
So you want to hear about how a guys cock tastes? About how it feels to get rammed in the butt by a big one. You want to hear about how it feels to have someone cum all over your face?guy27 said:
I'd rather hear about future shop, global warming and gas shortages.
