Shout your abortion!

[Sieggo]

Guys always have a choice to engage in sex or not, they also can choose to use a condom, or pull out as well.

I've seen this quote used so many times, and it suggests that the woman has absolutely no say in the matter. Sure, a guy has the choice to have sex with or without a condom, but the woman has the exact same choice. If he doesn't have a condom, why is the woman agreeing to have sex with him if she doesn't want to chance pregnancy?

 

[huckfinn]

Added to ignore list. I've had many of my colleagues and friends tell me they were pressured by clients or civilians to not use condoms. I think there's more pressuring coming from men than women. Why? I've always had to buy and put on the condoms. I have never dated someone who ever bothered to buy or had condoms on him. Women get most of the blame from men, yet they're the ones who are producing sperm and can choose to ejaculate or not, and where. A small minority of men have a vasectomy or are infertile. If this wasn't the case then there wouldn't be so many unwanted pregnancies and unwanted children born.

The onus is on both sexes.

Condoms and birth control are choices.

And btw I carry condoms.....and I'm fixed.

 

[Smallcock]

Men and women can chose sex and chose to use protection but only women can become pregnant and have an abortion. It's not fair, it's not right or wrong, and it's not a double standard. It is just a matter of fact. Most women accept that the stakes are higher for them when having sex and take added precautions because of it.

These are the cards we're given.

All that said, it's not very difficult to not get pregnant if basic safe sex practices are used.

 

[Aardvark154]

I like this woman's stance.

All unwanted pregancies are 100% men's fault.

Are you discussing the big wide world -- in which case although the woman should be on the pill, it is a wise move for the man to provide condoms.

OR

Are you discussing this world where is is most definitely the SP's responsibility to make sure there are condoms.

 

[basketcase]

I think you meant to say, laudable.

Well done

But that doesn't lessen the fact that you opinion is just your opinion and has no bearing on the rights of Canadian (or American) women. Hell, even the Irish just voted to legalize abortion.

 

[basketcase]

...
A judge is not free to interpret whether a law is just, he is simply applying it ...

When we are talking about higher courts, that is exactly their job.

 

[TeeJay]

When we are talking about higher courts, that is exactly their job.

BS
I challenge you to quote / link a single case

If a law is "unjust" the court will not simply snuff the law out of existence
They are only interpreting it


To the contrary we even have what is known as the "override" clause which allows a province or parliament to basically ignore the Supreme court for 5 years
That is how Quebec language law and Saskatchewan labour law are still in force despite both being declared unconstitutional

 

[Jasmine Raine]

Are you discussing the big wide world -- in which case although the woman should be on the pill, it is a wise move for the man to provide condoms.

OR

Are you discussing this world where is is most definitely the SP's responsibility to make sure there are condoms.

I just liked her post. I found some humour it in and I posted it. Take from it what you will.

Not going to get into who's responsibility it is in the SP world either. I figured that was a no-brainer since both really need protection. But hey, if you want to rely on the lady and out your life literally in her hands - all the power to Ya!

Added to ignore list.

You lasted longer then most sweetie. The force is strong with you. LOL.

 

[basketcase]

BS
I challenge you to quote / link a single case

If a law is "unjust" the court will not simply snuff the law out of existence...

The higher courts routinely have struck down laws that they see as unjust (aka violating the constitution/Charter). One prime example that comes to mind is the previous law on prostitution.

Provinces do have remedies such as the notwithstanding but when it comes to abortion, we are not talking about provincial law.

 

[Robert Mugabe]

Holy Crap, I can't believe I actually agree with YOU!

I heard this one before, but it has been defeated in argument. However, if you could guarantee the kid would grow up to be a country singer, it might be considered grounds for termination.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Great_Beethoven_fallacy

 

[Toronto_234]

https://savethestorks.com/2018/03/nurse-stunned-baby-survives-abortion-heart-beating-strongly/