Sharon Stone Says She Was Duped Into Going Commando In 'Basic Instinct'
She decided to allow the scene because it was "correct for the film and for the character; and because, after all, I did it," she writes in her upcoming book.
She was an A list actress through the early 90's after BI. She made Sliver, pretty much BI 2.0. Then she won an Oscar for Casino, where she played De Niro's coke slut wife. Then she made some poor choices for vehicles and some of the lustre rubbed off.Didn't really get a good look on the clip or in the theater. However. She was a really nice looking girl, with a high IQ I read. She just never seemed to get the cred she wanted. Don't know why. Just an also ran. I quite like her though. I would do her, which is a compliment from me seeing as she isn't Chinese.
I think she was duped. I think he was pissed. THEN I think she used it. Which is what she appears to admit.Duped?!.... She milked that scene for most of her career!
I haven't read the bio, but exactly how do you dupe a 30 year old into not wearing panties and spreading her legs?I think she was duped. I think he was pissed. THEN I think she used it. Which is what she appears to admit.
Just because it started as a manipulative move by the producer doesn’t mean she can’t claim it at the end of it all.
I say Good for her. She owed the scene for herself instead of giving it to director.
She is not complaining. She is telling the facts of the story and owning it for herself in the end.
I don’t see where she is “complaining” or lying about being tricked in the beginning. Can you point that out?
She is just telling the story as it happened.
No argument here, Sharon Stone is marginally talented, Casino is a mediocre film. I'm just not into the hissy (Tom Boy Cruise) style of acting, it's exhausting and not fun to watch. There's a difference between histrionic and operatic - that's what makes Nicolas Cage so special.And to be honest, outside of her commando BI scene, Casino was the pinnacle of her career. She would have been completely forgettable otherwise.
I think she was duped. I think he was pissed. THEN I think she used it. Which is what she appears to admit.
Just because it started as a manipulative move by the producer doesn’t mean she can’t claim it at the end of it all.
I say Good for her. She owed the scene for herself instead of giving it to director.
She is not complaining. She is telling the facts of the story and owning it for herself in the end.
I don’t see where she is “complaining” or lying about being tricked in the beginning. Can you point that out?
She is just telling the story as it happened.
He's got you there Jen. Put yourself in her shoes back then. You have Newman (Wayne Knight) in front of you licking his lips every time you spread your legs and you would actually fall for this?? I believe the goal is to sell her books. How many ladies today would gladly jump at a scene like this if it would make them lots and lots of dollars. I would if I can wiggle my willy at the camera and make 100,000s of dollars too. (stop laughing and get my willy wiggle out of your mind before responding please)I haven't read the bio, but exactly how do you dupe a 30 year old into not wearing panties and spreading her legs?
How do men get duped into EMT scams on LL?I haven't read the bio, but exactly how do you dupe a 30 year old into not wearing panties and spreading her legs?
Personally, I wouldn’t do it if I felt a certain way about showing my vagina because I am not gullible. But clearly I don’t have issue since I shoot my own porn and sell it for a monthly fee. LOLHe's got you there Jen. Put yourself in her shoes back then.
Luckily they didn't fool her into full penetration. One moment you think you're shooting the remake of Sound of Music, the next thing you know you're sitting on a cock.They fooled her into not wearing panties and uncrossing her legs directly in front of a camera. Legit.





