drrogers said:This wannabe doesn't do it for me. An offspring from hippy parents born in the "Shwa" is worth a ton of coin but - too skinny and way too much hair - what ever happened to neatly trimmed?
Maybe because "neatly trimmed" is more the domain of conservative white vulgarians these days. Hairless is to pubes what McMansions are to houses.drrogers said:This wannabe doesn't do it for me. An offspring from hippy parents born in the "Shwa" is worth a ton of coin but - too skinny and way too much hair - what ever happened to neatly trimmed?
gibsomstreet said:Perhaps Shalom Harlow can be excused "generationally" (i.e. she's old enough to be part of an era where unshaven was still the rule rather than the exception). But considering we're talking about nude "art photography" of a supermodel here, that should be enough to validate pubes from a style POV, hardly a sign of gross, unkempt sloth.
Real life doesn't imitate porn stars and SPs, you know. What you're witnessing here is the silent majority among intimate grooming.
james t kirk said:Her bush IS neatly trimmed. That is not full bush. I very much like a nice bush comme ca on a woman.
But she needs a few cheese burgers.