http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/10/05/prostitution-law005.html#socialcomments
PS: If it was posted somewhere, my apologies. Please move it into the thread
PS1: I found some comments are really funny. My favorite is "canadaawakening" because of his handle and the content he is writing
canadaawakening wrote:
Posted 2009/10/07
at 2:26 PM ETThe domatrix really turns me off when she is asked how she screens her clients, and then she brings out her whip, and says, "With this."
Where is the dignity for the freewill of another human person if she think she has the right to use the whip to force and coerce others to do her will and her bidding? Where is the equality between partners? Where is the respect for the dignity and the freewill of the other?
Even in her interview, she reads out her statement without giving the interviewer a chance to get a word in edge-wise to ask questions or to engage with her. It is either "her way" or the "highway."
She cannot be engaged with or questioned by another equal partner to develop a real and a meaningful relationship. She uses the whip to impose herself on others. Who gave her this right unless it is some immature child?
PS: If it was posted somewhere, my apologies. Please move it into the thread
PS1: I found some comments are really funny. My favorite is "canadaawakening" because of his handle and the content he is writing
canadaawakening wrote:
Posted 2009/10/07
at 2:26 PM ETThe domatrix really turns me off when she is asked how she screens her clients, and then she brings out her whip, and says, "With this."
Where is the dignity for the freewill of another human person if she think she has the right to use the whip to force and coerce others to do her will and her bidding? Where is the equality between partners? Where is the respect for the dignity and the freewill of the other?
Even in her interview, she reads out her statement without giving the interviewer a chance to get a word in edge-wise to ask questions or to engage with her. It is either "her way" or the "highway."
She cannot be engaged with or questioned by another equal partner to develop a real and a meaningful relationship. She uses the whip to impose herself on others. Who gave her this right unless it is some immature child?
