Senate Expense Audit Released

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,961
23,565
113
Harper is probably happy on some level about this, it'll increase the outrage about the senate and help in his plan to kill it.
Duffy may get off, but that won't help Harper, making Duffy's spending legal only makes Harper look worse since he put him there and guided his actions through the PMO.

It may benefit the NDP more, who can now argue its time to throw out both corrupt parties.
 

corrie fan

Well-known member
Nov 13, 2014
970
396
63
I was amused to see Sen. Plett's name on the list of 21 senators who have had their expenses questioned. He is the redneck who said the govt. didn't want to make it safer for sex workers. Unfortunately his case is not one that was referred to the RCMP.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,065
5,181
113
Honestly all this does is create a "pox on them all" situation now. Other than as a talking point for the pundits.

During the election all the parties will very this and promise reform. So it will probably now end up a wash in the electorate's eyes.

The Duffy trial has just become a non issue in comparison to some degree of the other Senator's spending habits.

Sorry squeezer.
 
Apr 7, 2014
63
6
8
They spent $23m on this audit and this is all they found? I could have told them the senate wastes taxpayer money for much less. Seriously, wtf?
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
The "rules are vague" excuse doesn't fly with me. You (the senators) are matured adults in your 40's or older with lots of life and some legal experience. You should know the difference between right and wrong, ethical and unethical.
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,928
8
38
They spent $23m on this audit and this is all they found? I could have told them the senate wastes taxpayer money for much less. Seriously, wtf?
I've never got how government audits for things like this can cost so much.

When companies hire accounting firms to do audits on various kinds of paperwork involving expenses, costing, pricing, contracts etc....., there's teams of 10 people working on it for months going through all kinds of paper, emails, etc..... it costs a few hundred grand.

Who and how many people are they hiring to investigate stuff? Maybe if they are hiring the entire Deloitte company, it'll cost $23M! :D
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
They spent $23m on this audit and this is all they found? I could have told them the senate wastes taxpayer money for much less. Seriously, wtf?
lol

Government auditing itself. Some of the senators were probably on the payroll of the audit. lol
 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,928
8
38
Although not practical in the Senate example as the expenses can be huge, but for normal employees at companies who may have to expense things, best way for the company to save money is to NOT give out corporate cards.

Instead, you make them use their own credit cards or cash and let them expense it. That way, it must be approved before the payables clerk pays you back. If the boss takes a look at the expenses and sees some fishy shit going on, sorry, that charge isn't getting expensed. Now if the employee is broke, then fine, give them a corporate card that time to expense it. Or ask another employee to do the purchase.

Too many times I've seen corporate card guys screwing around. If there is a fishy thing, it's too late as it's already charge and then it's up to the boss to try to recoup it which I have never seen.

Paying with your own card first has it's perks too because you get to rack up the loyalty points for yourself!
 

Mr Bret

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2012
5,476
941
113
Besides all the misuse and abuse of taxpayers money, there's one thing that puzzles me about this case.
How the hell does this Wright guy, a civil servant, come up with $90k he can just hand over to Duffy to cover off expenses?

I don't know about you folks, but even though I do pretty well, I would have to bite a pretty sizeable bullet to be able to hand that kind of pocket change over to someone who doesn't really deserve it in the first place.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,256
17
38
Besides all the misuse and abuse of taxpayers money, there's one thing that puzzles me about this case.
How the hell does this Wright guy, a civil servant, come up with $90k he can just hand over to Duffy to cover off expenses?

I don't know about you folks, but even though I do pretty well, I would have to bite a pretty sizeable bullet to be able to hand that kind of pocket change over to someone who doesn't really deserve it in the first place.

Wright is is a real big cheese in the private sector..he is loaded with $$$$. That said there is nothing too abnoxious coming out about Harper.

the Star will let this story go real soon.
 

Mr Bret

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2012
5,476
941
113
Wright is is a real big cheese in the private sector..he is loaded with $$$$. That said there is nothing too abnoxious coming out about Harper.

the Star will let this story go real soon.
Thanks. I'm not up to date on my big cheese statuses.
 
Toronto Escorts