Lol!! This has been so from the very beginning, only it was not permitted to voice it in the polite company. It goes without saying that the mortality numbers suffer from the same bias.a told ya so moment
Assuming we can gauge “care” from who’s choosing to cover this story, and its relative importance compared to other daily stories, it appears to be the top story on The Associated Press, New York Times, Reuters, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, Mail & Guardian (South Africa), ABC News (Australia), The Korea Herald, The Japan Times and The Times of India.No. The world has moved on. Only Canada cares about this mild strain.
There’s been a debate on this reporting since it started to be reported.I think that has always been a component - it might just be that it is such a high proportion right now.
What do you mean "next one"? People have been trying to make that a thing since the beginning.So the next one will be........
Of the counted deaths. How many died with Covid and how many died because of Covid?
Its a really valid data point that needs to be shown.What do you mean "next one"? People have been trying to make that a thing since the beginning.
At his cottage. Where do you want to him to be.Where is Doug Ford!
No, they are not. Stop it with the fearmongeringThings are going to get very bad in Ontario soon
What bad, the fake numbers or the fear-factor mongers?Things are going to get very bad in Ontario soon.
You're right, but the "evolving science " about the covid mortality must be released in small doses else the plebs will be demanding the high priests of science to be defrocked and tossed into the closest body of water.So the next one will be........
Of the counted deaths. How many died with Covid and how many died because of Covid?