Ryene - Whitebay

[kyle_lee]

Fairly disappointing session with Ryene although not at all her fault.

Upon entering I could tell she was just NMCOT and she was late thirties at best, likely mid to late forties. I think some may find her attractive, more likely if you're not Asian yourself. I think if this are a $2xx parlour where you expect an auntie you'd be ecstatic, but I wish they priced it at $3xx so I could have avoided or had lower expectations going in.

Pros were she had an above average massage and good bbbj. Think her service level is quite high, greeting included DFK, but I personally just wasn't interested and spent most of main event in doggy to avoid facial contact.

 

[insanett]

I wonder if the disappointment was more about the expectations going in than anything Ryene actually did. By your own account, she gave an above-average massage, provided a high level of service, and greeted you warmly. It sounds like the experience itself was solid—it just didn’t quite match what you had pictured beforehand.

To me, she looked early 30s, definitely not 40s lol. And pics were matched with her real appearance.

I’ve seen her twice already, and both times were among the best experiences I’ve had. She was very clean, very tight, with no unpleasant smells, never rushed anything, and made every interaction feel exciting.

 

[ym7921]

I wonder if the disappointment was more about the expectations going in than anything Ryene actually did. By your own account, she gave an above-average massage, provided a high level of service, and greeted you warmly. It sounds like the experience itself was solid—it just didn’t quite match what you had pictured beforehand.

To me, she looked early 30s, definitely not 40s lol. And pics were matched with her real appearance.

I’ve seen her twice already, and both times were among the best experiences I’ve had. She was very clean, very tight, with no unpleasant smells, never rushed anything, and made every interaction feel exciting.

No offense but when the age is wrong by several decades and the photos are heavily photshopped people will obviosuly have different expectations going in but thats on the agency to make sure the age and photos are reasonably closely.

And yes I know photos and age are always smudged a bit but when someone is charging a high rate they should be reasonably close. A lot of people choose provides based of their preferences.

This is all on the agency. Stop misleading people.

It's funny because they have also hoa and her pics are very accurate and the age is not that off from the posted one but for Ryene both things are very off

 

[kingkong321]

No offense but when the age is wrong by several decades and the photos are heavily photshopped people will obviosuly have different expectations going in but thats on the agency to make sure the age and photos are reasonably closely.

And yes I know photos and age are always smudged a bit but when someone is charging a high rate they should be reasonably close. A lot of people choose provides based of their preferences.

This is all on the agency. Stop misleading people.

It's funny because they have also hoa and her pics are very accurate and the age is not that off from the posted one but for Ryene both things are very off

I think you’re combining two different issues.


If the agency is intentionally misleading people, that’s a fair criticism. But saying the age is wrong by decades or that the agency is misleading people should be backed by evidence, not assumptions.


You also mentioned another provider from the same agency whose photos and age are accurate. That suggests this may be an issue with one profile rather than proof that the agency as a whole is misleading customers.


It’s fair to ask for more accurate profiles, but it’s important to separate facts from speculation.

 

[ym7921]

I think you’re combining two different issues.


If the agency is intentionally misleading people, that’s a fair criticism. But saying the age is wrong by decades or that the agency is misleading people should be backed by evidence, not assumptions.


You also mentioned another provider from the same agency whose photos and age are accurate. That suggests this may be an issue with one profile rather than proof that the agency as a whole is misleading customers.


It’s fair to ask for more accurate profiles, but it’s important to separate facts from speculation.

What evidence can someone provide? Its not like I can take photos off her during a session. That's fine if you don't believe me but it's pretty clear if you go see her, her age is very exaggerated. They list her as 19 while she looks easily late 30's. That's a difference of 2 decades. Her pics are heavily photoshopped. Why would the agency do this unless they are hoping to mislead people?

There is no speculation going on here and it's not the first time whitebay has done something like this. It's a gamble which sucks and is frustrating when you get burned but at the same time you get gems like Hoa.

 

[shembasha1234]

What evidence can someone provide? Its not like I can take photos off her during a session. That's fine if you don't believe me but it's pretty clear if you go see her, her age is very exaggerated. They list her as 19 while she looks easily late 30's. That's a difference of 2 decades. Her pics are heavily photoshopped. Why would the agency do this unless they are hoping to mislead people?

There is no speculation going on here and it's not the first time whitebay has done something like this. It's a gamble which sucks and is frustrating when you get burned but at the same time you get gems like Hoa.

Personally id rather see more critical reviews like ym's vs. Reading another "best experience this year" crap. It's good. We need the harsh critical sometimes.