Rolling Stone rape hoaxer doesn't want to answer questions anymore

[canada-man]

The woman known as Jackie who shocked the world with her lurid tale of being gang-raped at a University of Virginia fraternity party doesn't want to answer any more questions as part of a lawsuit.

Filed by U.Va.'s associate dean of students, Nicole Eramo, the lawsuit alleges Rolling Stone Magazine, which published the false rape story, defamed her when it accused her of being cruel to sexual assault accusers. In late January, a judge ordered Jackie to turn over any and all communications between her and Eramo, as well as between her and the author of the article, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, that related to her accusation.

A judge has given Eramo's attorneys seven hours to depose Jackie, but because of the sheer volume of communications between her and Erdely, and the fact that Eramo would have to share the time with Rolling Stone's attorneys, the U.Va. dean is asking for another three hours. Naturally, Jackie and her attorney don't want to talk anymore, and Jackie especially doesn't want to talk about her rape claims.


Jackie wants mention of her sexual assault claims excluded from the deposition. Eramo's lawyers have said that would be fine — if Jackie admits she lied about the gang rape. Evidence uncovered after the Rolling Stone article was published, as well as a statement from local police, proved that the accusation described in the article could not have happened.

Jackie's lawyer maintains in a motion to quash the deposition subpoena that the woman who was proven to have lied to Rolling Stone and the world is, in fact, a "sexual assault victim," and therefore entitled to compassion. They say each of Eramo's requests are a "negative attack" on Jackie, which demonstrate "a complete lack of compassion for" her.

The attorney also claims Eramo wants to "use the deposition as a weapon to inflict as much harm on [Jackie] as possible, with utter disregard for the significant and undeniable psychological harm that will result and without regard to the actual asserted claims in the case." Jackie and her attorney also claimed that she will "suffer if forced to answer questions about the trauma she suffered and the aftermath" of her accusation.

Sorry, but Jackie's feelings don't matter any more. She made false accusations and created a false narrative that seriously harmed many innocent people. Also, as K.C. Johnson (author of the book on the Duke Lacrosse rape hoax) noted on Twitter: "Can 'trauma' result from an assault that never occurred?"



http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/r...t-to-answer-questions-anymore/article/2586739

 

[SkyRider]

"Jackie" is the poster girl/woman for the "We Believe Survivers" mob.

 

[SkyRider]

"Can 'trauma' result from an assault that never occurred?"

Yes, assault, real or imagined, can cause trauma. However, we don't accuse, arrest or criticize real people or put them in jail for imagined assaults that they never committed.

 

[Celticman]

Her trauma is the result of lying and now being caught in the aftermath. In fact lies that could have ruined the lives of some young men. I think her real trauma should come from being criminally charged, convicted and her ass thrown in jail. Women like this need to think about the damage they do to the real cause of women that actually suffer rape and the innocent men that could go to jail and have their lives ruined with a conviction like this. If rape carries, say, a 1-10 year possible jail term, then that is exactly what a demonstrably false accusation should carry. Note, I am not including a he said she said that is inconclusive.

 

[Smallcock]

When are they going to put her in jail?

 

[canada-man]

'Jackie' must testify in lawsuit over Rolling Stone rape story

A Virginia judge has ruled that the woman at the center of Rolling Stone's discredited story about an alleged frat house gang rape must testify as part of a lawsuit against the magazine.

The woman identified only as "Jackie" will be deposed on Thursday by attorneys representing Rolling Stone and Nicole Eramo, the University of Virginia administrator who is suing the magazine and the author of the now-retracted article, Sabrina Rubin Erdely.

Erdely's 2014 piece, "A Rape On Campus," featured Jackie's graphic claim to have been raped by a group of fraternity members during her freshman year at UVA.

Eramo, an associate dean of students at UVA, is suing Rolling Stone and Erdely for defamation over what she says was an unfair portrayal of her as an insensitive campus bureaucrat in the story. She is seeking $7.85 million in damages.

The story unraveled after doubts about Jackie's allegation surfaced. Police eventually said they found no evidence that the rape occurred, and an independent review conducted by Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism found sweeping editorial failures on the part of Rolling Stone.



Attorneys for Jackie had resisted the deposition, arguing that she would be re-victimized if forced to recount the incident under oath and it could bring her "extreme psychological" and "irreparable harm."

At a hearing held Monday in a Charlottesville, Virginia, Judge Glen E. Conrad denied a motion filed by Jackie's attorneys to quash the deposition subpoena.
Conrad ruled that all records and transcripts of the deposition will be sealed, and that it will be held at a "mutually convenient location, with priority given to the convenience of and comfort" of Jackie.

The judge said that the plaintiff's attorneys may depose Jackie for five hours over a two-day period, or may petition for additional time.

Libby Locke, an attorney for Eramo, said Rolling Stone's negligence led to her client's unflattering portrayal.

"Jackie was Rolling Stone's sole source for the false tale of rape that it recklessly published. There were numerous red flags in Jackie's account, which should have put Rolling Stone on notice that she was not a credible source for information," Locke said. "Nevertheless, Rolling Stone was dead set on portraying Dean Eramo as a callous administrator who discouraged Jackie from reporting an assault to police — when in fact, it appears that Jackie knew that her tale of rape would not have stood up under real scrutiny and investigation. Had Rolling Stone done the fact-checking and digging that they were legally and ethically required to do as journalists, Dean Eramo would not have been so wrongfully targeted."

Attorneys for Rolling Stone and Jackie did not respond to a request for comment.

Rolling Stone also faces a $25 million suit from the UVA fraternity, Phi Kappa Psi, that was named in the article.
Three former frat members have also filed a suit against Rolling Stone, but have not specified an amount.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/05/media/jackie-rolling-stone-rape-story/index.html

 

[Aardvark154]

As mentioned ^ this is just the begining. Rolling Stone is also being sued by Phi Kappa Psi and three alumni of the fraternity who were named in the article.

 

[canada-man]

Why Is A Major DC Law Firm That Represented Monica Lewinsky Repping #FakeRape Artist #JackieCoakley For Free?

http://gotnews.com/major-law-firm-representing-fakerape-artist-jackiecoakley-free/



A major DC law firm with deep Clinton and Democratic ties has been representing Jackie Coakley for free, GotNews.com has learned.

The revelation confirms that the efforts to push the Jackie Coakley was raped narrative by Rolling Stone were part of a wider push to push a denial of male student due process rights.

What has been most unusual has been the presence of Jonathan Missner, a managing partner at Stein Mitchell Cipollone Beato & Missner LLP.

One of its other founding partners — Jacob A Stein — represented Monica Lewinsky and Nixon campaign attorney Kenneth Parkinson of Watergate fame, according to the Washington Post.

 

[mandrill]

Assuming that what you quoted from that rag you linked is true, I would guess that the law firm in question has a few thousand lawyers and represents half the litigants in Washington DC.

And I'd like to know what the "deep Clinton and Democratic ties" actually are? That one of the partners once went to a Bill fundraiser?!