I think I end up agreeing with you about half the time dodger lol. And I guess I half agree with ya now. It's a service thats real new, not many people have got to have a peek at these girls yet. I'm not exactly a noob round here. I'll have a second date with em in a couple days,.. we'll see whats what then. Maby a few other regular posters should try em out.
Review - Morgan and Michelle in Whitby
- Thread starter nitrogman
- Start date
One of the girls is "Ginger Lane" on their website.
I have used this agency recently to see another lady in the roster and found them to be to my satisfaction.
Sorry, I am another limited post member to appear in this thread with no proven credibility on this board.
One day I might gather the testicular fortitude to contribute more to you all, until then I will just lurk and read the wonderful reviews, like by the high count member of this thread with his perpetual glowing reviews of another Durham agency.
But thats not shilling/endorsing or advertizing....is it?
Hmmmmmmm.......
I have used this agency recently to see another lady in the roster and found them to be to my satisfaction.
Sorry, I am another limited post member to appear in this thread with no proven credibility on this board.
One day I might gather the testicular fortitude to contribute more to you all, until then I will just lurk and read the wonderful reviews, like by the high count member of this thread with his perpetual glowing reviews of another Durham agency.
But thats not shilling/endorsing or advertizing....is it?
Hmmmmmmm.......
Not according to what the agency said. I inquired about this offer and, apparently, there are no photos posted of either girl. I was given access to a picture of Morgan but not of Michelle. Can anyone clarify what Michelle looks like?dajodo2 said:
I don't think he was referring to the review being a shill. I think he was referring to Kristine's comments {which were removed} about the girls and comments about contact and photos etc. Since she is not in "blue" it would be up to the reviewer to provide the information or for AGA to renew advertising. I do know they were blue before.dajodo2 said:
I feel a little bad here because I was the one who put up a fight with the free advertising going on in the Durham section. I am the only paid agency advertiser and they are only a couple of other Indy ladies that pay for advertising and recently there was a thread where I came out and publicly made a complaint.
When I was not an advertiser, I had my signature and link removed. I thought I was doing the same as Kristine, which was answering the questions asked in threads about SSE. I was told this was still consider advertising and so I had to make my payments like everyone else. I did and all has been fine, but doing so I wanted to make sure that if I was being made to pay for advertising, then the rule should be made for everyone to do the same. So I feel bad that I may have been responsible for this new "must be an advertiser" tone for Durham.
Now Kris and I know each other and we are actually pretty good friends, so I don't want people to think this is an AGA/SSE thing. It is just a TERB advertising policy thing.
Hope that clears things up.
Healthy Competition!
As for AGA/SSE.... we are friends and healthy competitors. We speak regularly to each other and have a good laugh doing it... also unfortunately we occasionally have to share information on the very few "JERKS" and I am being polite that make the agencies draw hard lines. It is with this open dialogue that Angela and I have and will continue to have that will keeps us flurishing in Durham.
Regards...
Kristine
First off I did NOT mean to offend anyone as I did not realize the rules had changed in regards to even answering posts... so please accept my apology.Angela@SinfullySweets said:I don't think he was referring to the review being a shill. I think he was referring to Kristine's comments {which were removed} about the girls and comments about contact and photos etc. Since she is not in "blue" it would be up to the reviewer to provide the information or for AGA to renew advertising. I do know they were blue before.
I feel a little bad here because I was the one who put up a fight with the free advertising going on in the Durham section. I am the only paid agency advertiser and they are only a couple of other Indy ladies that pay for advertising and recently there was a thread where I came out and publicly made a complaint.
When I was not an advertiser, I had my signature and link removed. I thought I was doing the same as Kristine, which was answering the questions asked in threads about SSE. I was told this was still consider advertising and so I had to make my payments like everyone else So I did and all has been fine, but doing so I wanted to make sure that if I was being made to pay for advertising, then the rule should be made for everyone to do the same. So I feel bad that I may have been responsible for this new "must be an advertiser" tone for Durham.
Now Kris and I know each other and we are actually pretty good friends, so I don't want people to think this is an AGA/SSE thing. It is just a TERB advertising policy thing.
Hope that clears things up.
As for AGA/SSE.... we are friends and healthy competitors. We speak regularly to each other and have a good laugh doing it... also unfortunately we occasionally have to share information on the very few "JERKS" and I am being polite that make the agencies draw hard lines. It is with this open dialogue that Angela and I have and will continue to have that will keeps us flurishing in Durham.
Regards...
Kristine
